TSK
Nippon Cable System, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73038660 |
| Registration Number | 1031988 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Barclay Damon, LLP |
| Attorney Name | Jason S. Nardiello |
| Attorney Docket Number | 3036421 TSK |
Timeline
| 1953-11-30 | Date of First Use |
| 1974-12-04 | Application Filed |
| 1976-02-03 | Trademark Registered |
| 2016-02-03 | Renewal Date |
| 2016-03-28 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2016-03-28 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  NIPPON CABLE SYSTEM, INC. |
| Address | 12-28, 1-CHOME, SAKAE-MACHI TAKARAZUKA-SHI, HY JP |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | JP |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 6 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,012,013,014,023,025,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0061 | FLEXIBLE CONTROL CABLE BEING THE PARTS OF VEHICLES AND APPARATUS FOR LOCOMOTION BY LAND, AIR AND WATER |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1982-03-22 | 1 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | 1996-02-01 | 2 9.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 1996-04-25 | 3 RNL1 Q: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-08-07 | 4 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2006-08-07 | 5 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2006-11-08 | 6 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2006-11-17 | 7 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2006-11-17 | 8 RNL2 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-10-04 | 9 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2016-01-20 | 10 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2016-03-28 | 11 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2016-03-28 | 12 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2016-03-28 | 13 RNL3 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2016-03-28 | 14 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2021-12-08 | 15 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2021-12-08 | 16 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2021-12-08 | 17 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | 2021-12-08 | 18 EWAF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | 2021-12-08 | 19 ECDR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2021-12-08 | 20 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2021-12-08 | 21 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 