Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 72409134 |
Registration Number | 1126482 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Law Office Assigned | 560 |
Employee Name | FEELEY, ROBERT M |
1867-00-00 | Date of First Use |
1971-12-01 | Application Filed |
1979-10-30 | Trademark Registered |
1999-10-30 | Renewal Date |
2013-10-02 | Cancelled |
2013-10-02 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
2013-10-02 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | 45 BROAD ST. ATLANTA DE |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
OR0001 | Whereas, Registration No. 1,126,482 has been involved in Concurrent Use Proceeding No. 422, Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. B. Rich's Sons, Inc; and Whereas it has been determined that registrant's rights in the mark shown in said registration for the goods specified therein are superior only in that area of the United States excluding the District of Columbia, the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and that portion of the state of Virginia which comprises the counties of Albemarle, Arlington, Caroline, Clarke, Culpeper, Essex, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Greene, King George, Loudoun, Madison, Orange, Page, Prince William, Rappahannock, Richmond, Rockingham, Shenandoah, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Warren, and Westmoreland all municipalities located within said counties; and Now, therefore, it is ordered that said registration be, and the same hereby is, restricted by excluding therefrom the District of Columbia, the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and that portion of the state of Virginia which comprises the counties of Albemarle, Arlington, Caroline, Clarke, Culpeper, Essex, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Greene, King George, Loudoun, Madison, Orange, Page, Prince William, Rappahannock, Richmond, Rockingham, Shenandoah, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Warren, and Westmoreland and all municipalities located within said counties in accordance with the provisions of Section 18 of the Trademark Act of 1946. |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1972-11-17 | 1 CNRT F:First Action |
COURT ORDER AMENDMENT OR RESTRICTION | 1981-09-01 | 2 OROR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1985-10-29 | 3 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1986-01-15 | 4 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 1999-10-07 | 5 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | 2000-01-13 | 6 9G8P O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2000-01-13 | 7 RNL1 Q: |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-01-03 | 8 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | 2013-10-02 | 9 C8.T O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.