U.S. patent number RE43,441 [Application Number 13/107,688] was granted by the patent office on 2012-06-05 for flexible material.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Stirling Mouldings Limited. Invention is credited to David Stirling Taylor.
United States Patent |
RE43,441 |
Taylor |
June 5, 2012 |
Flexible material
Abstract
A flexible material includes a plurality of separate resilient
elements joined to a flexible, resiliently stretchable substrate.
Such a material is suitable for providing protective war for human
and animal bodies. Preferably, the elements includes a foam
material such as a closed cell polyethylene foam and the substrate
includes a knitted fabric. In an advantageous embodiment, a second
flexible substrate is bonded over the elements to sandwich them
between the two layers of substrate.
Inventors: |
Taylor; David Stirling
(Accrington, GB) |
Assignee: |
Stirling Mouldings Limited
(GB)
|
Family
ID: |
26315759 |
Appl.
No.: |
13/107,688 |
Filed: |
July 13, 2000 |
PCT
Filed: |
July 13, 2000 |
PCT No.: |
PCT/GB00/02687 |
371(c)(1),(2),(4) Date: |
April 23, 2002 |
PCT
Pub. No.: |
WO01/03530 |
PCT
Pub. Date: |
January 18, 2001 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
12642522 |
Dec 18, 2009 |
Re. 42689 |
|
|
|
11269919 |
Nov 8, 2005 |
Re. 41346 |
|
|
Reissue of: |
10030782 |
Apr 23, 2002 |
6743325 |
Jun 1, 2004 |
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13, 1999 [GB] |
|
|
9916291 |
Sep 16, 1999 [GB] |
|
|
9921804 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
156/265; 156/560;
156/299; 156/259; 2/456; 2/22; 2/16; 156/301; 156/512; 156/308.2;
428/141; 428/304.4; 156/300; 156/271 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A41D
13/05 (20130101); B32B 7/12 (20130101); A41D
13/0156 (20130101); B32B 5/18 (20130101); B63C
9/093 (20130101); B32B 5/026 (20130101); B32B
3/16 (20130101); B32B 3/18 (20130101); B32B
5/245 (20130101); A41D 31/285 (20190201); A61G
7/05707 (20130101); Y10T 156/1095 (20150115); Y10T
428/249953 (20150401); Y10T 156/1087 (20150115); B32B
2266/08 (20130101); Y10T 156/1093 (20150115); B32B
2571/02 (20130101); Y10T 428/24355 (20150115); Y10T
156/13 (20150115); B32B 2266/025 (20130101); Y10T
156/1067 (20150115); Y10T 156/1077 (20150115); Y10T
156/1754 (20150115); Y10T 156/1092 (20150115); B32B
2437/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B32B
38/04 (20060101) |
Field of
Search: |
;2/2.15,2.16,16,20,22,23,24,455,456
;156/251,256,259,264,265,271,299,300,301 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3641609 |
|
Feb 1988 |
|
DE |
|
9102039 |
|
May 1991 |
|
DE |
|
4341722 |
|
Jun 1994 |
|
DE |
|
19640263 |
|
Apr 1998 |
|
DE |
|
202006013732 |
|
Feb 2007 |
|
DE |
|
1 369 149 |
|
Dec 2003 |
|
EP |
|
2581348 |
|
Nov 1986 |
|
FR |
|
2635650 |
|
Mar 1990 |
|
FR |
|
800474 |
|
Aug 1958 |
|
GB |
|
832101 |
|
Apr 1960 |
|
GB |
|
2 304 539 |
|
Mar 1997 |
|
GB |
|
1-316235 |
|
Dec 1989 |
|
JP |
|
2508289 |
|
Aug 1996 |
|
JP |
|
9300510 |
|
Nov 1997 |
|
JP |
|
10043007 |
|
Feb 1998 |
|
JP |
|
10337797 |
|
Dec 1998 |
|
JP |
|
97/33493 |
|
Sep 1997 |
|
WO |
|
97/36740 |
|
Oct 1997 |
|
WO |
|
01/03530 |
|
Jan 2001 |
|
WO |
|
01/15892 |
|
Mar 2001 |
|
WO |
|
02/16124 |
|
Feb 2002 |
|
WO |
|
02/081202 |
|
Oct 2002 |
|
WO |
|
2006/036072 |
|
Apr 2006 |
|
WO |
|
2006/088734 |
|
Aug 2006 |
|
WO |
|
Other References
"ESC Steel Rule Dies," available at
http://escutters.co.uk/#/laser-flat-bed/4525904364 (last visited
Mar. 30, 2010), 1 page. cited by other. cited by other .
"Hot Melt Adhesives Technology Review," Pacific Northwest Pollution
Prevention Resource Center (Sep. 1988), available at
http://pprc.org/pubs/techreviews/hotmelt.hmintro.html (last visited
Mar. 30, 2010), 2 psges. cited by other. cited by other .
"Protecting Your Assets," World Sports Activewear, vol. 2, Issue 3
(Autumn 1996), pp. 24-28. cited by other. cited by other .
Bender, Rene J., "Handbook of Foamed Plastics" (1965), pp. 285-293.
cited by other. cited by other .
Corrected Version of Exhibit 2, Part 1 to the Memorandum in Support
of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed Jun. 5,
2009 (Doc. No. 62). cited by other. cited by other .
Declaration of Alyson G. Barker in support of Nike USA's Responsive
Claim Construction, filed Jul. 13, 2009, and Exhibit A thereto
(Doc. No. 96). cited by other. cited by other .
Hoffman, Edward G., "Jig and Fixture Design" (1980), pp. 205-219.
cited by other. cited by other .
Jeff Hopkins, "Advances, Advantages, and Techniques of Hot Melt
Adhesives", Journal of Industrial Textiles, (1993), pp. 5-13. cited
by other. cited by other .
John Halbmaier, "Overview of Hot Melt Adhesives Application
Equipment for Coating and Laminating Full-Width Fabrics", Journal
of Industrial Textiles, (1992), pp. 301-310. cited by other. cited
by other .
Joint Claim Construction Chart and Status Report, filed Sep. 1,
2009 (Doc. No. 135). cited by other. cited by other .
Lascoe, O.D., "Handbook of Fabrication Processes" (1988), p. 215.
cited by other. cited by other .
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary
Injunction, filed May 28, 2009, and Exhibits 1-10 thereto (Public
(Redacted) Version) (Doc. No. 54). cited by other. cited by other
.
Memorandum Opinion and Order Construing Disputed Claim Terms,
entered Sep. 17, 2009, Honorable James F. Holderman (Doc. No. 137).
cited by other. cited by other .
Petrie, Edward M., "Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants" (2000), p.
308. cited by other. cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Claim Construction Memorandum, filed Jun. 15, 2009, and
Exhibits 1-6 thereto (Doc. No. 67). cited by other. cited by other
.
Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Memorandum on Claim Construction, filed Jul.
13, 2009, and Exhibits 1-5 thereto (Doc. No. 97). cited by other.
cited by other .
Responsive Claim Construction Brief of Defendant Nike USA, Inc.,
filed Jul. 13, 2009 (Redacted) (Doc. No. 95). cited by other. cited
by other .
Roff, W.J., et al., "Handbook of Common Polymers--Fibres, Films,
Plastics and Rubbers" (1971), p. 456. cited by other. cited by
other .
SAE Specification AMS 3698A, (Jul. 1, 1987), 13 pages. cited by
other. cited by other .
SAE Specification AMS 3698B, (Jan. 1, 1993), 1 page. cited by
other. cited by other .
Sarna Xiro GmbH, EC Safety Data Sheet, Jan. 16, 2001, 5 pages.
cited by other. cited by other .
Walker, John R., "Machining Fundamentals--From Basic to Applied
Techniques" (1993), pp. 502-503. cited by other. cited by other
.
Walter Fung, "Coated And Laminated Textiles", (2002), pp. 114-133.
cited by other. cited by other .
Watson, Chris, "Hot Melt Coating Methods: The More They Change the
More They Stay the Same," 1996 Hot Melt Symposium TAPPI Proceedings
(1996),pp. 1-5. cited by other. cited by other .
Memorandum Opinion And Order, case No. 1:08-cv-06584, filed Aug.
17, 2011, 32 pages (Doc. No. 345). cited by other .
Minute Order dated Nov. 15, 2011 regarding Nike's Motion for
Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. No.
363)--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 380). cited by other .
Third Amended Complaint dated Sep. 16, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard,
Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 355). cited
by other .
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's
Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the
'346 Patent Under The Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 19,
2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 356). cited by other .
Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to
Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment dated
Sep. 23, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for
Reconsideration of Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary
Judgment of Non-Infringement of Claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under
the Doctrine of Equivalents dated Sep. 30, 2011--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No.
361). cited by other .
Nike USA, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third
Amended Complaint dated Oct. 7, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 363). cited by
other .
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Nike's Motion for Partial
Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Oct. 27,
2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 367). cited by other .
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of
Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9,
2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 371). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1
in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of
Infringement of U.S. Patent Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Nov. 9,
2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 375). cited by other .
Nike USA Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Partial
Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint dated Nov. 10,
2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 379). cited by other .
Defendant Nike USA Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to
Reconsider Order Granting Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment: dated
Sep. 23, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 358). cited by other .
Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2011 regarding Motion For Reconsideration of
Order Granting Nikes Motion for Summary judgment of
Non-infringement of claim 1 of the '346 Patent Under the Doctrine
of Equivalents--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
No. 08-CV-6584. (Doc. No. 366). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Construction Memorandum dated Nov. 5,
2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 307). cited by other .
Declaration of Alyson G. Barker in Support of Defendant Nike USA
Inc 's Responsive Claim Construction Brief re Reissue Patent dated
Nov. 19, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. V. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 311). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Nike's Opening Claim Construction
Brief dated Nov. 19, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA,
Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 318). cited by other .
Reply by Plaintiffs McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. Stirling Mouldings
Limited to Nike's Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Dec.
10, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 324). cited by other .
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying motion for preliminary
injunction signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on Jan. 14,
2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No 171). cited by other .
Mandate of USCA Federal Circuit dated Dec. 9, 2010 regarding Notice
of Appeal related to denial of motion for preliminary injunction on
Dec. 15, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 325). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Brief Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of
the Court's Claim Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S.
Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard,
Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 389). cited
by other .
Defendants Memorandum Regarding Prosecution History of U.S. Patent
RE42,689 dated Dec. 12, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA,
Inc, Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 390). cited by other .
Response by Defendant Nike USA, Inc. regarding Plaintiffs' Brief
Regarding the Patent Office's Consideration of the Court's Claim
Construction in the Prosecution History of U.S. Reissue Patent
RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA,
Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 391). cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Response to Nike's Memorandum Regarding the Prosecution
History of U.S.Reissue Patent RE42,689 dated Dec. 19, 2011--McDavid
Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-DV-6584 (Doc. No.
392). cited by other .
Transcript of Proceedings held on Nov. 15, 2011--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 388).
cited by other .
Transcript of Proceedings held on Dec. 20, 2011--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 393).
cited by other .
Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant Nike USA, Inc.'s Opposition to
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement dated Dec.
10, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard. Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 323). cited by other .
Defendant-Appellee Appeal Brief in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 11,
2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. cited by other .
Plaintiff-Appellant Appeal Brief in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated Mar.
29, 2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. cited by other .
Plaintiff's Reply Brief in the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit 2010-1171 (from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Illinois) dated May 28,
2010--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584. cited by other .
Defendant's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement
of U.S. Reissue Patent RE42,689 Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 dated
Feb. 3, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 409). cited by other .
Nike's Response to Plaintiff's Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 415). cited by other .
Declaration of Turner regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiffs
Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 416). cited by other
.
Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's
Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 417). cited by other
.
Declaration of Brookstein regarding Nike's Response to Plaintiff's
Statements of Fact dated Feb. 3, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc No. 429). cited by other
.
Memorandum Opinion And Order dated Mar. 5, 2012--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 450),
11 pages. cited by other .
Motion by Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and
Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.4 dated Feb.
24, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 437). cited by other .
Response by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. in Opposition to Motion by
Nike USA, Inc. to amend/correct Non-Infringement and Invalidity
Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3A dated Feb. 29,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 439). cited by other .
Reply by McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited to
response in opposition to motion Reply in Support of Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent
RE42,689 dated Feb. 29, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA,
Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 440). cited by other
.
Response to Defendants Additional Statement of Facts by McDavid
Knee Guard, Inc., Stirling Mouldings Limited dated Feb. 29,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 443). cited by other .
Reply by Nike USA, Inc. In Support of its Motion to Amend
Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions dated Feb. 29,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 444). cited by other .
Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 1, 2012
authorizing supplementation of invalidity contentions--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc.
No. 446). cited by other .
Minute Entry before Honorable James F. Holderman on Mar. 5, 2012
denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment--McDavid Knee Guard,
Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 449).
cited by other .
Nike's Invalidity Contention Charts 1-21 (non-confidential
attachments to confidential Supplemental Invalidity
Contentions)--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
Action No. 08-CV-6584. cited by other .
McDavid's Reply to Defendant's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions
regarding U.S. Reissue Patent 42,689 dated Apr. 5, 2012--McDavid
Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584.
cited by other .
Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Apr. 19,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 454). cited by other .
Nike's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of
Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike
USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 458). cited by
other .
Nike's Statements of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local
Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of
Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike
USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 459). cited by
other .
Nike's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Apr.
19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 462). cited by other .
Nike's Memorandum and Points of Authorities in Support of
Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement dated
Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 465). cited by other .
Nike's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local
Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of
Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 466). cited
by other .
McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of no. Invalidity of US
Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc.
v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 470).
cited by other .
McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of
No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 471). cited by other .
McDavid's Rule 56(a) Statement regarding Motion for Summary
Judgment of No Invalidity US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 472). cited by other .
McDavid's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent
No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc.
No. 477). cited by other .
McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of
No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr.
19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 478). cited by other .
McDavid's Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1
in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No
Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr.
19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 479). cited by other .
Declaration of Glenn L. Beall regarding Motion for Summary Judgment
in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of No
Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 Usc 112 dated Apr.
19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action
No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 480). cited by other .
McDavid's Motion for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689
dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.,
Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 483). cited by other .
McDavid's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
for Claim Construction of US Patent No. RE42,689 dated Apr. 19,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 484). cited by other .
Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of
Invalidity dated Apr. 19, 2012 dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc.
No. 460). cited by other .
Declaration of Schletzbaum regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of
Non-Infringement dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v.
Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 467). cited
by other .
Nike's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Reply to Nike's
Non-Infringement Contentions dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee
Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc.
No. 473). cited by other .
Declaration of Jaren E. Hedman regarding Motion for Summary
Judgment of No Invalidity of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC
251 dated Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA,
Inc., Civil Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 474). cited by other
.
Declaration of Henkelmann regarding Motion for Summary Judgment in
Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity
of US Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated Apr. 19,
2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil Action No.
08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 481). cited by other .
Corrected Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local
Rule 56.1 in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of
No Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. RE42,689 Under 35 USC 112 dated
Apr. 19, 2012--McDavid Knee Guard, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Civil
Action No. 08-CV-6584 (Doc. No. 486). cited by other.
|
Primary Examiner: Osele; Mark A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery,
LLP
Parent Case Text
RELATED U.S. APPLICATIONS
.[.Not applicable..].
.Iadd.Notice: multiple reissue applications have been filed for the
reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,325. This application is a
continuation reissue application of reissue application Ser. No.
12/642,522, filed on Dec. 18, 2009, which is a continuation reissue
application of Ser. No. 11/269,919, filed on Nov. 8, 2005, now U.S.
Pat. No. Re. 41,346, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat.
No. 6,743,325, filed as application Ser. No. 10/030,782 on Apr. 23,
2002, which claims priority to PCT/GB00/02687 filed Jul. 13, 2000;
GB99/16291 filed Jul. 13, 1999; and GB 99/21804 filed Sep. 16,
1999; all of which are hereby fully incorporated by reference as if
fully set forth herein..Iaddend.
Claims
I claim:
.[.1. A method of manufacturing a flexible material comprising the
steps of providing a sheet of a resilient material; cutting the
sheet into a plurality of spaced separate elements using a cutter
which is pressed into the sheet to cut therethrough; making one
side of the plurality of spaced separate elements to stand proud of
a surface of a jig provided to hold the elements in place; and
bonding a flexible resiliently stretchable substrate to one side of
the separate elements by heating the substrate either to activate
an adhesive applied between said one side of the separate elements
and the substrate or to weld the separate elements to the
substrate..].
.[.2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sheet is cut
into a plurality of separate elements using a cutter which acts as
the jig after cutting through the resilient material to hold the
elements in place while the substrate is applied thereto..].
.[.3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the cutter is
adapted so that said one side of each of the cut elements is made
to stand proud of a surface of the cutter after cutting through
said sheet of resilient material..].
.[.4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein any excess
resilient material located between the plurality of spaced separate
elements is retained in the cutter..].
.[.5. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein any excess
resilient material is removed from between the plurality of spaced
separate elements prior to the elements being bonded to the
substrate..].
.[.6. The method as claimed in any of claim 1, wherein the
plurality of spaced separate elements comprise a foam
material..].
.[.7. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: bonding
a second flexible substrate to an opposite side of the plurality of
spaced separate elements to said one side..].
.[.8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least said one
side of the sheet is coated with a hot-melt adhesive prior to being
cut into the plurality of spaced separate elements..].
.[.9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the side of the
substrate adjacent said one side of the plurality of spaced
separate elements is coated with a hot-melt adhesive..].
.[.10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a sheet of
hot-melt film is interposed between said one side of the plurality
of spaced separate elements and the substrate so as to provide said
adhesive..].
.[.11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sheet of
resilient material is cut into strips in a first direction using a
plurality of rolling cutters and then cut in a second direction at
an angle to the first direction to form the plurality of spaced
separate elements..].
.[.12. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the rolling
cutters are moved sideways after each cut to cut narrow strips of
material in both directions to space the elements apart, the narrow
strips of material being removed to leave the plurality of spaced
separate elements spaced from one another..].
.[.13. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the substrate is
heated by a heated platen which either activates the adhesive or
melts the surface and thereby bonds the substrate and the plurality
of spaced separate elements together..].
.[.14. The method as claimed claim 10, wherein the substrate is
heated by passing the substrate and the adjacent plurality of
spaced separate elements between heated nip rollers..].
.Iadd.15. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently
compressible material, the method comprising: providing a first
resiliently stretchable fabric substrate; cutting a sheet of
resiliently compressible foam with a cutter that goes completely
through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual
resiliently compressible elements in a spaced apart relationship,
the separate elements having a top surface and bottom surface;
providing a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
contacting the top surfaces and the bottom surfaces of the
plurality of resiliently compressible elements with the first and
second resiliently stretchable fabric substrates; bonding the top
surfaces of the plurality of separate individual compressible
elements to the first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate
while adjacent elements are held so that a distance between the
adjacent elements is about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the
group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and bonding the
bottom surfaces of the plurality of separate individual
compressible elements to the second resiliently stretchable fabric
substrate while adjacent elements are at the distance of about 2
mm, the bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively
bonding and welding, to provide the flexible resiliently
compressible material with the plurality of separate resiliently
compressible elements being distributed between the substrates at a
density of from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m.sup.2, and the
first and second substrates not bonded to each other between the
adjacent elements..Iaddend.
.Iadd.16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the elements are
distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000
to about 8000 elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.17. The method according to claim 15 wherein the top and
bottom surfaces of the elements are flat..Iaddend.
.Iadd.18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the elements are
distributed between the substrates at a density of from about 4000
to about 6000 elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.19. The method according to claim 15 wherein the elements are
comprised of layers of foam having different
densities..Iaddend.
.Iadd.20. The method according to claims 15 wherein the elements
are comprised of polyethylene foam..Iaddend.
.Iadd.21. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently
compressible material, the method comprising: cutting a sheet of
resiliently compressible foam with a cutter that goes completely
through the foam to provide a plurality of separate individual
resiliently compressible elements with side walls of adjacent
elements being spaced apart at a distance of about 2 mm, the
separate individual elements having a top surface and bottom
surface; holding the separate individual elements; bonding the top
surfaces of the separate individual compressible elements to a
first resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent
elements are held so that the distance of about 2 mm is between the
side walls of the adjacent elements, the bonding selected from the
group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and bonding the
bottom surfaces of the separate resiliently compressible elements
to a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate to provide the
resiliently compressible material with the fabric substrates not
bonded to each other between the separate elements while walls of
adjacent elements are held about 2 mm apart and the separate
elements being distributed between the substrates at a density of
from about 250 to about 8000 elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.22. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate
elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of
from about 4000 to about 6000 elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.23. The method according to claim 22 wherein the top and
bottom surfaces of the separate elements are flat..Iaddend.
.Iadd.24. The method according to claim 23 wherein the separate
elements are comprised of layers of foam having different
densities..Iaddend.
.Iadd.25. The method according to claim 21 wherein the top and
bottom surfaces of the separate elements are flat..Iaddend.
.Iadd.26. The method according to claim 25 wherein the separate
elements are comprised of layers of foam having different
densities..Iaddend.
.Iadd.27. The method according to claim 26 wherein the separate
elements are distributed between the substrates at a density of
from about 4000 to about 6000 elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.28. The method of claim 26 wherein the layers of foam having
different densities are closed cell foam..Iaddend.
.Iadd.29. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate
elements are comprised of layers of foam having different
densities..Iaddend.
.Iadd.30. The method according to claim 21 wherein the separate
elements are comprised of closed cell foam..Iaddend.
.Iadd.31. The method according to claims 21 wherein the separate
elements are comprised of polyethylene foam..Iaddend.
.Iadd.32. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently
compressible material, the method comprising: providing a first
resiliently stretchable fabric substrate; cutting a sheet of
resiliently compressible foam with a cutting grid that goes
completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate
individual resiliently compressible elements in a spaced apart
relationship, separate individual elements of the plurality of
resiliently compressible elements having top surfaces and bottom
surface which are flat; providing a second resiliently stretchable
fabric substrate; contacting top surfaces and bottom surfaces of
the plurality of resiliently compressible elements with the first
and second resiliently stretchable fabric substrates; holding the
separate individual resiliently compressible elements in spaced
apart relation after the cutting grid cuts the resiliently
compressible foam; bonding the top surfaces of the resiliently
compressible elements to the first resiliently stretchable fabric
substrate while adjacent elements are held so that a distance
between the elements is about 2 mm, the bonding selected from the
group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding; and bonding the
bottom surfaces of the resiliently compressible elements to the
second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate while adjacent
elements are at a distance of about 2 mm, the bonding selected from
the group consisting of adhesively bonding and welding, to provide
the resiliently compressible material with the fabric substrates
not bonded to each other between adjacent individual elements and
to provide the flexible resiliently compressible material with the
individual resiliently compressible elements being distributed
between the substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000
elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
.Iadd.33. A method of manufacturing a flexible resiliently
compressible material, the method comprising: providing a first
resiliently stretchable fabric substrate; cutting a sheet of
resiliently compressible foam with a cutting grid that goes
completely through the foam to provide a plurality of separate
individual resiliently compressible elements, the separate
individual elements having a top surface and a bottom surface;
providing a second resiliently stretchable fabric substrate;
holding the plurality of separate individual resiliently
compressible elements so that adjacent separate elements are at a
distance of about 2 mm after cutting the resiliently compressible
foam; bonding the top surfaces of the separate compressible
elements to one of the first and second resiliently stretchable
fabric substrates while the plurality of separate individual
resiliently compressible elements are at a distance of about 2 mm
between adjacent separate elements to provide a fabric/element
combination; and bonding one of the first and second fabric
substrates to the surface of the elements of the fabric/element
combination to provide the resiliently compressible material, the
bonding selected from the group consisting of adhesively bonding
and welding, the fabric substrates of the resiliently compressible
material not bonded to each other between the adjacent separate
elements and the separate elements being distributed between the
substrates at a density of from about 250 to about 8000
elements/m.sup.2..Iaddend.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Not applicable.
REFERENCE TO MICROFICHE APPENDIX
Not applicable.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a
flexible material suitable, primarily, for use as a flexible
protective material to protect for human and animal bodies.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Protective material and protective wear is currently used by
persons to protect themselves from knocks, abrasions and other
injury. Protective wear is used during sport, rugby for example and
equestrian sports and other activities where a person runs a risk
of injury, for example building and other trades.
Conventional protective wear may form an integral part of an item
of clothing, for example a shoulder pad, or be provided separately,
for example a shin pad.
One existing arrangement comprises a moulded foam article shaped to
fit a particular part of the body. There are, however, a number of
problems with this arrangement. The article must be produced in
different sizes to fit different people. Provision of different
sizes can be expensive or inconvenient. Also, closely fitting
articles can restrict movement of the wearer, especially when worn
on or near joints.
In DE 43 41 722 is disclosed a cushioning material for the
treatment of lymphostatic fibroses in which a plurality of foam
elements with an enlarged base are disposed side-by-side with their
bases touching on a foundation layer to which they are affixed. The
troughs defined between the side walls of the elements enable the
material to be flexed to form a pressure bandage. However, the
foram elements of the bandage touch one another at their base,
which restricts the stretchability of the material as a whole and
is also designed to be worn with the elements in contact with the
skin, which would restrict movement.
A moulded foam article can only correctly fit a joint when in one
position. When the joint moves, the article will no longer fit
correctly. This may reduce the protection it affords.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,285,768 is disclosed a fabric coated with a
surface deformed foam which is manufactured either by grooving or
slashing a sheet of foam to a portion of its depth and then
laminating it to the fabric or by laminating a foam sheet to a
fabric and then grooving or slashing the form layer. However,
neither of these methods enables the foam to be cut to define a
plurality of spaced, separate elements, which is preferred if the
fabric is to be used in protective wear for ,sports persons when
considerable freedom of movement by the wearer is required in
addition to comfort.
Another existing arrangement comprises a quilted material including
lengths of foam sewn into pockets formed between two layers of
fabric. Such materials are time consuming to produce. Also, such
materials can generally only easily be flexed in a direction
perpendicular to that of the strips of foam. Flexing the material
in a direction along the length of the strips involves flexing the
strips themselves which, depending on the type of foam used, can be
difficult. A similar type of garment is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
5,551,082 which describes an athletic garment in which
strategically placed rib-shaped gel, air or foam padding is
contained in envelopes that are individually affixed to an
elasticized fabric shell.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to overcome, or at least
reduce, the problems associated with the manufacture of
conventional protective material and with protective wear made
therefrom.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is
provided a method of manufacturing a flexible material comprising
the steps of providing a sheet of a resilient material; cutting the
sheet into a plurality of spaced, separate elements using a cutter
which is pressed into the sheet to cut therethrough; making one
side of the spaced elements to stand proud of the surface of a jig
provided to hold the elements in place; and bonding a flexible,
resiliently stretchable substrate to one side of the separate
elements by heating the substrate either to active an adhesive
applied between said one side of the separate elements and the
substrate or to weld the elements to the substrate.
The separate elements are preferably bonded to the substrate with a
hot melt adhesive, although they can be welded thereto using heat
to fuse the elements to the substrate.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is
provided a flexible material comprising a layer of separate
resilient elements joined to a flexible, resiliently stretchable
substrate and manufactured according to the method of the first
aspect of the present invention.
Such a flexible material can confirm more easily to the body of the
wearer than conventional materials, as it is flexible in all three
dimensions. It is therefore more comfortable to wear and can
accommodate movement better than conventional materials. When used
as a protective material or to form protective wear a single size,
or a reduced number of sizes, can fit many different sized
bodies.
As the elements are separate and spaced apart; this facilitates
flexing of the substrate to form a curved surface and enables the
material to flex in all directions without "locking up" or
preventing movement in a particular direction. This is a particular
advantage the flexible material of the present invention has over
prior art arrangements which tend not to exhibit universal
flexibility.
The elements preferably comprise a resilient foam material, for
example a closed cell polyethylene, and could comprise a number of
different types of foam or other materials to give desired
properties, for example layers of foam of different densities.
The elements may be substantially identical, alternatively they can
be of different size and shape, for example to fit comfortably part
of a wearer's body, or some other article.
The elements preferably take the form of blocks. They can be of
regular or irregular shape, for example hexagonal or octagonal in
cross-section. The elements are preferably evenly distributed on
the substrate with a density of between 100 and 8000
elements/m.sup.2, more preferably between 250 and 8000
elements/m.sup.2, and still more preferably between 4000 and 6000
elements/m.sup.2. In one embodiment, the elements comprise cubes of
side 12 mm spaced apart by 2 mm. This gives a density of about 5000
cubes/m.sup.2. This allows the material to flex easily along all
directions, an improvement over known quilted protective materials.
Also, one type of material can be cut to many different sizes, for
example to form protective wear of different sizes, without
significantly affecting its ability to flex. This is in contrast to
known quilted protective materials wherein due to the size of the
foam strips, the size of each strip must be changed to form an
article of different size without reducing flexibility.
The substrate is resiliently stretchable or elastic and preferably
comprises a fabric, although a resiliently stretchable film or
sheet could be used. This enables the material to adopt a greater
range of configurations. Suitable fabrics include knitted nylon and
polyester fabrics and more particularly those materials comprising
elastane.
A second layer of a flexible substrate material is preferably
bonded over the elements so that they are sandwiched between two
layers. In this case, as the first substrate layer is resiliently
stretchable or elastic, this helps to prevent puckering of one side
of the material when it is flexed. Advantageously, both substrate
layers are resiliently stretchable. However, in cases where only a
single stretchable substrate layer is provided and the material is
to be used in a curved configuration the material is preferably
arranged so that the stretchable layer lies on the outside surface
of the curve.
The material may be comprised in clothing or other wear. It is
particularly suitable for incorporation into protective clothing
and wear, for example shoulder pads, knee pads, shin pads, arm
bands, head-guards, vests and gauntlets for both humans and
animals. It will be appreciated that in these garments the blocks
are provided where required and omitted from certain areas of the
garment. For example, in a headguard no blocks need be positioned
in the ear-flaps of the guard.
The material could also be comprised in furniture or upholstery and
can be particularly useful when used with wheelchairs and hospital
beds. Spaced part elements can help to reduce the incidence of bed
sores. As the material is resilient, it comprises a cushioning
medium, for,; example for saddles. Where the material comprises a
foam layer, this provides it with good thermally insulating
properties and it can be usefully incorporated into, or used to
form wet suits. A foam layer can also render the material buoyant
in water, in which case it can be usefully used in or to form
buoyancy vests, life jackets and swimming aids. When used as a
swimming aid, for example, the material can be incorporated in
swimming costumes as an aid to the buoyancy of the wearer. It is
possible in this case to arrange for the foam blocks to be
progressively removable from the costume as the confidence and
skill or the trainee swimmer increases.
The material may also be used for packaging and cladding.
As indicated above, the elements may not be distributed all over
the surface of the substrate. In particular, there may be a border
of substrate having no element thereon. The border may include a
fastening means, for example VELCRO(.TM.) to enable it to be
affixed to itself or to another article, say a garment.
In one embodiment, the elements could comprise a series of
spaced-apart strips. Such a material would have different
properties when flexed in different directions.
Preferably, at least said one side of the elements are coated with
the hot-melt adhesive prior to being cut into the separate
elements. Alternatively or in addition, the side of the substrate
adjacent said one side of the elements is coated with the hot-melt
adhesive. A sheet of hot-melt film may also be interposed between
said one side of the elements and the substrate to provide said
adhesive layer.
Advantageously, the resilient sheet is cut into a plurality of
separate elements using a cutter which acts as the jig after
cutting through the resilient material to hold the elements in
place while the substrate layer is applied thereto. Preferably, the
cutter is adapted so that said one side of each, now cut, element
are made to stand proud of the surface of the cutter grid. The
sheet material may spring back slightly after cutting to accomplish
this. Alternatively, means, such as ejectors, are provided to
achieve this effect.
In one embodiment of the method, a sheet of a resilient material is
provided and at least one side of the sheet is coated with a hot
melt adhesive. The sheet is placed, adhesive side up, over a cutter
grid arranged to cut the sheet into a plurality of elements, for
example squares. The sheet is pressed down onto the cutter to cut
through the sheet. Excess material from between the elements is
then removed. A resiliently stretchable substrate is placed over
the, now cut, sheet and heated to activate the adhesive to join the
elements to the substrate. The substrate is then lifted away from
the cutter, taking the elements with it.
It will be appreciated that in this embodiment, the cutter grid
acts as a jig, holding the elements in placed while the substrate
layer is applied. If the flexible material is to be cut into large
pieces, in particular large irregularly shaped pieces, then these
pieces may be assembled into a specially constructed jig to hold
them into place before application of the substrate. Conveniently,
as before the sheet of resilient material from which the elements
are cut has an adhesive layer applied to one or both surfaces prior
to the cutting process.
Alternatively, the sheet of resilient material is cut into strips
in a first direction using a plurality of rolling cutters and then
cut in a second direction at an angle to the first direction to the
separate elements. Preferably, the rolling cutters are moved
sideways after each cut to cut narrow strips of material in both
directions to space the elements apart, the narrow strips of
material being removed to leave the separate elements spaced apart
from one another.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the various aspects of the invention will now be
described by way of example with reference to the accompanying
drawings.
FIG. 1 is an enlarged perspective view of part piece of flexible
material according to the invention.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of a protective arm band formed from
the type of material of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a plan view of a cutter grid.
FIGS. 4 to 6 are vertical cross-sectional views of apparatus used
in the manufacture of material as shown in FIG. 1 at various stages
respectively throughout the manufacturing process.
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view through another embodiment of a
flexible material according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Referring to FIG. 1, a flexible material comprises a plurality of
cubes 1 of a resilient closed-cell polyethylene foam, of side
approximately 12 mm and with corners of radius approximately 2.5
mm, joined with a hot melt adhesive to a fabric substrate 2. The
cubes 1 are evenly arranged, each cube being spaced from adjacent
cubes by approximately 2 mm. The fabric 2 is a resiliently
stretchable knitted fabric, preferably one comprising polyester or
elastane fibers.
A margin of fabric 2 is provided around the periphery of the cubes
1. Along the edges of the fabric at opposite ends respectively
there are strips 3 of VELCRO(.TM.), only one of which is shown.
Referring to FIG. 2, a protective armband 4 is shown being worn on
part of an arm 5. The armband 4 is formed from a generally
rectangular piece of material of the type shown in FIG. 1 but which
in this case comprises a fabric substrate 6 bonded to both sides
thereof with a plurality of foam cubes 7 sandwiched therebetween.
Margins are provided at opposite ends respectively of the substrate
6 and a strip of VELCRO(.TM.) 8 is fastened on this margin to
enable opposite ends of the material to be fastened in an
overlaying relationship to form a tube. By varying the degree of
overlap of the ends, the tube can be closely fitted around arms of
different sizes. The provision of a substrate layer 6 on both sides
of the cubes 7 prevents the latter from separating too much as the
material is curved around to form a tube. Rather, the substrate 6
on the outside of the armband is forced to stretch and the edges of
the cubes 7 at the inner side of the armband are compressed. The
provision of a substrate layer on both sides of the material
therefore enables the material to continue to provide good
protection, even when tightly flexed.
FIG. 3 shows a plan view of a cutter used for manufacturing the
material of FIG. 1. The cutter comprises blades defining a
plurality of squares of 12 mm side with corners of radius 2.5
mm.
FIGS. 4 to 6 are vertical cross-sectional views of apparatus at
various stages respectively throughout the manufacture of the
flexible material shown in FIG. 1. Referring to these figures, one
side of a 12 mm thick layer of closed cell polyethylene foam 10 is
coated with a hot melt adhesive 11. The foam 10 is then placed onto
a cutter 12, of the type shown in FIG. 3, and pressed down with a
press 13 so that the cutter 12 cuts through the foam 10 to form a
plurality of separate cubes. The press is then removed, whereupon
owing to its resilient nature, the foam will tend to spring back
slightly so that the exposed surface of each cube stands proud to
lie above the surface of the cutter. Excess material from between
the elements is then removed.
Next, as shown in FIG. 5, a layer of fabric is placed over the foam
and cutter 12 and a heated platen 15 is brought into contact with
the fabric 14. Heat is conducted through the fabric 14 to the foam
and activates the adhesive, bonding the fabric 14 to the foam 10.
In this arrangement, the cutter grid acts as a jig, holding the
foam cubes in position whilst the fabric substrate 14 is applied
thereto.
Then, as shown in FIG. 6, the fabric can be lifted away from the
cutter taking the foam cubes 10 with it.
In an alternative method, ejectors are disposed in the cutter grid
to eject the elements, leaving any waste material behind in the
cutters.
If the foam 10 is to be cut into large pieces, in particular large
irregularly shaped pieces such as may be suitable for use in an
equestrian jacket, then these pieces may be assembled into a
specially constructed jig to hold them into place before
application of the fabric substrate 14. As described above, the
sheet of resilient foam from which the elements are cut will have
hot-melt adhesive applied to one or both surfaces prior to the
cutting process.
In a further variation, the sheet of resilient material is cut into
strips in a first direction using a plurality of rolling cutters.
The sheet is cut in a second direction perpendicular to the first
to form cubes. The cutters are then moved sideways to cut narrow
strips of foam in both directions to space the cubes apart, the
narrow strips of foam being stripped away to leave the cubes.
FIG. 7 shows another embodiment of flexible material similar to
that shown in FIG. 1, but with a layer of fabric 16 bonded to each
of opposite sides of tho elements 17. This embodiment may be
produced in a similar way to that shown in FIG. 1 except that
opposite sides of the foam layer are coated with adhesive and,
after the foam cubes bonded to a first layer of fabric have been
removed from the cutter, a second layer of fabric is placed over
the exposed surface of the elements and pressed with a heated
platen to effect a bond.
In other variations to the above methods, the hot-melt adhesive may
be applied to the surface the substrate rather or in addition to
the sides of the flexible material. Alternatively or in addition, a
hot-melt film can be interposed between the elements and the
substrate.
Also, heated nip-rollers can be used in place of a heated platen to
bond the elements to the substrate, particularly when substrate is
bonded to both sides of the elements, which are thereby sandwiched
therebetween. This facilitates passage of the material between the
rollers prior to activation of the adhesive.
Flexible materials according to the invention are more convenient
to produce and more flexible and versatile that known protective
materials. They may also be used in a variety of applications
including protective wear and clothing.
* * * * *
References