Ultrabarrier substrates Patent Grant Graff , et al. October 7, 2 [Battelle Memorial Institute]

Ultrabarrier substrates

Graff , et al. October 7, 2

Patent Grant RE40531

U.S. patent number RE40,531 [Application Number 10/890,437] was granted by the patent office on 2008-10-07 for ultrabarrier substrates. This patent grant is currently assigned to Battelle Memorial Institute. Invention is credited to Gordon Lee Graff, Mark Edward Gross, Michael Gene Hall, Peter Maclyn Martin, Eric Sidney Mast, Ming Kun Shi.

United States Patent	RE40,531
Graff , et al.	October 7, 2008

Ultrabarrier substrates

Abstract

A barrier assembly. The barrier assembly includes at least one barrier stack having at least one barrier layer and at least one polymer layer. The barrier stack has an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 23.degree. C. and 0% relative humidity, and an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 90% relative humidity. The barrier stack also has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 0.005 g/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 100% relative humidity. A method for making a barrier assembly is also disclosed.

Inventors:	Graff; Gordon Lee (West Richland, WA), Gross; Mark Edward (Pasco, WA), Shi; Ming Kun (Pleasanton, CA), Hall; Michael Gene (West Richland, WA), Martin; Peter Maclyn (Kennewick, WA), Mast; Eric Sidney (Richland, WA)
Assignee:	Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus, OH)
Family ID:	24208461
Appl. No.:	10/890,437
Filed:	July 12, 2004

Related U.S. Patent Documents


	Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
	09427138	Feb 18, 2003	6522067
Reissue of:	09553188	Apr 20, 2000	06413645	Jul 2, 2002

Current U.S. Class:	428/446; 426/126; 428/411.1; 428/457; 428/469; 428/500; 428/688; 428/690
Current CPC Class:	B32B 27/00 (20130101); C23C 14/08 (20130101); H01L 51/5256 (20130101); G02F 2201/50 (20130101); Y10T 428/31504 (20150401); Y10T 428/31678 (20150401); Y10T 428/31855 (20150401)
Current International Class:	B32B 15/04 (20060101)
Field of Search:	;428/446,457,469,688,500,690,411.1 ;426/126

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


2382432	August 1945	McManus et al.
2384500	September 1945	Stoll
3475307	October 1969	Teumer et al.
3607365	September 1971	Lindlof
3941630	March 1976	Larrabee
4061835	December 1977	Poppe et al.
4098965	July 1978	Kinsman
4266223	May 1981	Frame
4283482	August 1981	Hattori et al.
4313254	February 1982	Feldman et al.
4426275	January 1984	Meckel et al.
4521458	June 1985	Nelson
4537814	August 1985	Itoh et al.
4555274	November 1985	Kitajima et al.
4557978	December 1985	Mason
4572842	February 1986	Dietrich et al.
4581337	April 1986	Frey et al.
4624867	November 1986	Iijima et al.
4695618	September 1987	Mowrer
4710426	December 1987	Stephens
4722515	February 1988	Ham
4768666	September 1988	Kessler
4842893	June 1989	Yializis et al.
4843036	June 1989	Schmidt et al.
4855186	August 1989	Grolig et al.
4889609	December 1989	Cannella
4913090	April 1990	Harada et al.
4931158	June 1990	Bunshah et al.
4934315	June 1990	Linnebach et al.
4954371	September 1990	Yializis
4977013	December 1990	Ritchie et al.
5032461	July 1991	Shaw et al.
5036249	July 1991	Pike-Biegunski et al.
5047131	September 1991	Wolfe et al.
5059861	October 1991	Littman et al.
5124204	June 1992	Yamashita et al.
5189405	February 1993	Yamashita et al.
5203898	April 1993	Carpenter et al.
5204314	April 1993	Kirlin et al.
5237439	August 1993	Misono et al.
5260095	November 1993	Affinito
5336324	August 1994	Stall et al.
5354497	October 1994	Fukuchi et al.
5356947	October 1994	Ali et al.
5393607	February 1995	Kawasaki et al.
5395644	March 1995	Affinito
5402314	March 1995	Amago et al.
5427638	June 1995	Goetz et al.
5440446	August 1995	Shaw et al.
5451449	September 1995	Shetty et al.
5461545	October 1995	Leroy et al.
5464667	November 1995	Kohler et al.
5510173	April 1996	Pass et al.
5512320	April 1996	Turner et al.
5536323	July 1996	Kirlin et al.
5547508	August 1996	Affinito
5554220	September 1996	Forrest et al.
5576101	November 1996	Saitoh et al.
5578141	November 1996	Mori et al.
5607789	March 1997	Treger et al.
5620524	April 1997	Fan et al.
5629389	May 1997	Roitman et al.
5652192	July 1997	Matson et al.
5654084	August 1997	Egert
5660961	August 1997	Yu
5665280	September 1997	Tropsha
5681615	October 1997	Affinito et al.
5681666	October 1997	Treger et al.
5684084	November 1997	Lewin et al.
5686360	November 1997	Harvey et al.
5693956	December 1997	Shi et al.
5695564	December 1997	Imahashi
5711816	January 1998	Kirlin et al.
5725909	March 1998	Shaw et al.
5731661	March 1998	So et al.
5736207	April 1998	Walther et al.
5747182	May 1998	Friend et al.
5757126	May 1998	Harvey et al.
5759329	June 1998	Krause et al.
5771177	June 1998	Tada et al.
5771562	June 1998	Harvey, III et al.
5782355	July 1998	Katagiri et al.
5792550	August 1998	Phillips et al.
5795399	August 1998	Hasegawa et al.
5811177	September 1998	Shi et al.
5811183	September 1998	Shaw et al.
5821692	October 1998	Rogers et al.
5844363	December 1998	Gu et al.
5869791	February 1999	Young
5872355	February 1999	Hueschen
5891554	April 1999	Hosokawa et al.
5895228	April 1999	Biebuyck et al.
5902641	May 1999	Affinito et al.
5902688	May 1999	Antoniadis et al.
5904958	May 1999	Dick et al.
5912069	June 1999	Yializis et al.
5919328	July 1999	Tropsha et al.
5920080	July 1999	Jones
5922161	July 1999	Wu et al.
5929562	July 1999	Pichler
5934856	August 1999	Asakawa et al.
5945174	August 1999	Shaw et al.
5948552	September 1999	Antoniadis et al.
5952778	September 1999	Haskal et al.
5955161	September 1999	Tropsha
5965907	October 1999	Huang et al.
5968620	October 1999	Harvey et al.
5994174	November 1999	Carey et al.
5996498	December 1999	Lewis
6013337	January 2000	Knors
6040017	March 2000	Mikhael et al.
6045864	April 2000	Lyons et al.
6066826	May 2000	Yializis
6083313	July 2000	Venkatraman et al.
6083628	July 2000	Yializis
6084702	July 2000	Byker et al.
6087007	July 2000	Fujii et al.
6092269	July 2000	Yializis et al.
6106627	August 2000	Yializis et al.
6117266	September 2000	Horzel et al.
6118218	September 2000	Yializis et al.
6137221	October 2000	Roitman et al.
6146225	November 2000	Sheets et al.
6146462	November 2000	Yializis et al.
6150187	November 2000	Zyung et al.
6165566	December 2000	Tropsha
6178082	January 2001	Farooq et al.
6195142	February 2001	Gyotoku et al.
6198217	March 2001	Suzuki et al.
6198220	March 2001	Jones et al.
6203898	March 2001	Kohler et al.
6207238	March 2001	Affinito
6207239	March 2001	Affinito
6214422	April 2001	Yializis
6217947	April 2001	Affinito
6224948	May 2001	Affinito
6228434	May 2001	Affinito
6228436	May 2001	Affinito
6231939	May 2001	Shaw et al.
6264747	July 2001	Shaw et al.
6268695	July 2001	Affinito
6274204	August 2001	Affinito
6322860	November 2001	Stein et al.
6333065	December 2001	Arai et al.
6348237	February 2002	Kohler et al.
6350034	February 2002	Fleming et al.
6352777	March 2002	Bulovic et al.
6358570	March 2002	Affinito
6361885	March 2002	Chou
6387732	May 2002	Akram
6397776	June 2002	Yang et al.
6413645	July 2002	Graff et al.
6416872	July 2002	Maschwitz
6420003	July 2002	Shaw et al.
6436544	August 2002	Veyrat et al.
6460369	October 2002	Hosokawa
6465953	October 2002	Duggal
6468595	October 2002	Mikhael et al.
6469437	October 2002	Parthasarathy et al.
6492026	December 2002	Graff et al.
6497598	December 2002	Affinito
6497924	December 2002	Affinito et al.
6509065	January 2003	Affinito
6512561	January 2003	Terashita et al.
6522067	February 2003	Graff et al.
6537688	March 2003	Silvernail et al.
6544600	April 2003	Affinito et al.
6548912	April 2003	Graff et al.
6569515	May 2003	Hebrink et al.
6570325	May 2003	Graff et al.
6573652	June 2003	Graff et al.
6576351	June 2003	Silvernail
6592969	July 2003	Burroughes et al.
6597111	July 2003	Silvernail et al.
6613395	September 2003	Affinito et al.
6614057	September 2003	Silvernail et al.
6624568	September 2003	Silvernail
6627267	September 2003	Affinito
6628071	September 2003	Su
6653780	November 2003	Sugimoto et al.
6656537	December 2003	Affinito et al.
6664137	December 2003	Weaver
6681716	January 2004	Schaepkens
6720203	April 2004	Carcia et al.
6734625	May 2004	Vong et al.
6743524	June 2004	Schaepkens
6749940	June 2004	Terasaki et al.
6765351	July 2004	Forrest et al.
6811829	November 2004	Affinito et al.
6815887	November 2004	Lee et al.
6818291	November 2004	Funkenbusch et al.
6835950	December 2004	Brown et al.
6836070	December 2004	Chung et al.
6837950	January 2005	Berard
6864629	March 2005	Miyaguchi et al.
6866901	March 2005	Burrows et al.
6867539	March 2005	McCormick et al.
6872114	March 2005	Chung et al.
6872248	March 2005	Mizutani et al.
6872428	March 2005	Yang et al.
6878467	April 2005	Chung et al.
6888305	May 2005	Weaver
6888307	May 2005	Silvernail et al.
6891330	May 2005	Duggal et al.
6897474	May 2005	Brown et al.
6897607	May 2005	Sugimoto et al.
6905769	June 2005	Komada
6923702	August 2005	Graff et al.
6936131	August 2005	McCormick et al.
6975067	December 2005	McCormick et al.
6994933	February 2006	Bates
6998648	February 2006	Silvernail
7002294	February 2006	Forrest et al.
7012363	March 2006	Weaver et al.
7015640	March 2006	Schaepkens et al.
7018713	March 2006	Padiyath et al.
7029765	April 2006	Kwong et al.
7033850	April 2006	Tyan et al.
7056584	June 2006	Iacovangelo
7086918	August 2006	Hsiao et al.
7156942	January 2007	McCormick et al.
7183197	February 2007	Won et al.
2001/0015074	August 2001	Hosokawa
2001/0015620	August 2001	Affinito
2002/0022156	February 2002	Bright
2002/0025444	February 2002	Hebgrink et al.
2002/0068143	June 2002	Silvernail
2002/0069826	June 2002	Hunt et al.
2002/0102363	August 2002	Affinitio et al.
2002/0102818	August 2002	Sandhu et al.
2002/0125822	September 2002	Graff et al.
2002/0139303	October 2002	Yamazaki et al.
2002/0140347	October 2002	Weaver
2003/0038590	February 2003	Silvernail et al.
2003/0085652	May 2003	Weaver
2003/0098647	May 2003	Silvernail et al.
2003/0124392	July 2003	Bright
2003/0127973	July 2003	Weaver et al.
2003/0184222	October 2003	Nilsson
2003/0197197	October 2003	Brown et al.
2003/0218422	November 2003	Park et al.
2003/0235648	December 2003	Affinito et al.
2004/0029334	February 2004	Bijker et al.
2004/0046497	March 2004	Schaepkens et al.
2004/0071971	April 2004	Lacovangelo
2004/0113542	June 2004	Hsiao et al.
2004/0115402	June 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0115859	June 2004	Murayama et al.
2004/0119028	June 2004	McCormick et al.
2004/0175512	September 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0175580	September 2004	Schaepkens
2004/0209090	October 2004	Iwanaga
2004/0219380	November 2004	Naruse et al.
2004/0229051	November 2004	Schaepkens et al.
2004/0241454	December 2004	Shaw et al.
2004/0263038	December 2004	Ribolzi et al.
2005/0003098	January 2005	Kohler et al.
2005/0006786	January 2005	Sawada
2005/0051094	March 2005	Schaepkens et al.
2005/0079295	April 2005	Schaepkens
2005/0079380	April 2005	Iwanaga
2005/0093001	May 2005	Liu et al.
2005/0093437	May 2005	Ouyang
2005/0094394	May 2005	Padiyath et al.
2005/0095736	May 2005	Padiyath et al.
2005/0112378	May 2005	Naruse et al.
2005/0122039	June 2005	Satani
2005/0129841	June 2005	McCormick et al.
2005/0133781	June 2005	Yan et al.
2005/0140291	June 2005	Hirakata et al.
2005/0146267	July 2005	Lee et al.
2005/0174045	August 2005	Lee et al.
2005/0212419	September 2005	Vazan et al.
2005/0238846	October 2005	Arakatsu et al.
2006/0003474	January 2006	Tyan et al.
2006/0028128	February 2006	Ohkubo
2006/0061272	March 2006	McCormick et al.
2006/0062937	March 2006	Padiyath et al.
2006/0063015	March 2006	McCormick et al.
2006/0246811	November 2006	Winters et al.
2006/0250084	November 2006	Cok et al.
2007/0009674	January 2007	Okubo et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


704297	Feb 1968	BE
704 297	Feb 1968	BE
2353506	May 2000	CA
196 03 746	Apr 1997	DE
19603746	Apr 1997	DE
696 15 510	May 2002	DE
0 147 696	Jul 1985	EP
0 299 753	Jan 1989	EP
0 299 753	Jan 1989	EP
0 340 935	Nov 1989	EP
0 340 935	Nov 1989	EP
0 390 540	Mar 1990	EP
0 390 540	Oct 1990	EP
0 468 440	Jan 1992	EP
0 547 550	Jun 1993	EP
0 547 550	Jun 1993	EP
0 590 467	Apr 1994	EP
0 590 467	Apr 1994	EP
0 722 787	Jul 1996	EP
0 722 787	Jul 1996	EP
0 777 280	Jun 1997	EP
0 777 280	Jun 1997	EP
0 777 281	Jun 1997	EP
0 787 824	Aug 1997	EP
0 787 826	Aug 1997	EP
0 787 826	Aug 1997	EP
0 915 105	May 1999	EP
0 916 394	May 1999	EP
0 916 394	May 1999	EP
0 931 850	Jul 1999	EP
0 931 850	Jul 1999	EP
0 977 469	Feb 2000	EP
0 977 469	Feb 2000	EP
1 021 070	Jul 2000	EP
1127 381	Aug 2001	EP
1 130 420	Sep 2001	EP
1 278 244	Jan 2003	EP
1 514 317	Mar 2005	EP
S63-96895	Apr 1988	JP
63136316	Jun 1988	JP
63136316	Aug 1988	JP
64-18441	Jan 1989	JP
S64-41192	Feb 1989	JP
2-183230	Jul 1990	JP
3-290375	Dec 1991	JP
4-48515	Feb 1992	JP
4-14440	Apr 1992	JP
H4-267097	Sep 1992	JP
H5-182759	Jul 1993	JP
06-136159	May 1994	JP
06158305	Jun 1994	JP
61-79644	Jun 1994	JP
6-234186	Aug 1994	JP
07-074378	Mar 1995	JP
H07-147189	Jun 1995	JP
H7-192866	Jul 1995	JP
8-72188	Mar 1996	JP
H8-171988	Jul 1996	JP
8-179292	Jul 1996	JP
08325713	Oct 1996	JP
08325713	Dec 1996	JP
09059763	Apr 1997	JP
H9-132774	May 1997	JP
09-161967	Jun 1997	JP
09-232553	Sep 1997	JP
10-013083	Jan 1998	JP
H10-41067	Feb 1998	JP
11-017106	Jan 1999	JP
11-040344	Feb 1999	JP
11-255928	Sep 1999	JP
2000-058258	Feb 2000	JP
2002/505969	Feb 2002	JP
10312883	Mar 2002	JP
3579556	Oct 2004	JP
2006-294780	Oct 2006	JP
WO 87/07848	Dec 1987	WO
WO 98/00337	Jan 1989	WO
WO 95/10117	Apr 1995	WO
WO 96/23217	Aug 1996	WO
WO 97/04885	Feb 1997	WO
WO 97/16053	May 1997	WO
WO 97/22631	Jun 1997	WO
WO 98/10116	Mar 1998	WO
WO 98/18852	May 1998	WO
WO 99/16557	Apr 1999	WO
WO 99/16931	Apr 1999	WO
WO 99/46120	Sep 1999	WO
WO 00/26973	May 2000	WO
WO 00/35603	Jun 2000	WO
WO 00/35604	Jun 2000	WO
WO 00/35993	Jun 2000	WO
WO 00/36661	Jun 2000	WO
WO 00/36665	Jun 2000	WO
WO 01/68360	Sep 2001	WO
WO 01/81649	Nov 2001	WO
WO 01/82336	Nov 2001	WO
WO 01/82389	Nov 2001	WO
WO 01/87825	Nov 2001	WO
WO 01/89006	Nov 2001	WO
WO 02/26978	Apr 2002	WO
WO 03/016589	Feb 2003	WO
WO 03/098716	Nov 2003	WO
WO 2004/006199	Jan 2004	WO
WO 2004/016992	Feb 2004	WO
WO 2004/070840	Aug 2004	WO
WO 2004/089620	Oct 2004	WO
WO 2005/015655	Feb 2005	WO
WO 2005/045947	May 2005	WO
WO 2005/048368	May 2005	WO
WO 2006/036492	Apr 2006	WO

Other References

Inoue et al., Proc. Jpn. Congr. Mater. Res., vol. 33, p. 177-9, 1990. cited by examiner .
Affinito, J.F., et al., "Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes On Flexible Substrates", "Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating", Nov. 1995 ed R. Bakish, Bakish Press 1995, pp. 20-36. cited by examiner .
Penning, F.M., Electrical Discharges in Gasses, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1965, Chapters 5-6, pp. 19-35, and Chapter 8, pp. 41-50. cited by examiner .
Akedo et al., "LP-5: Lake-News Poster: Plasma-CVD SiNx/Plasma-Polymerized CNx:H Multi-layer Passivation Films for Organic Light Emmitting Diods", SID 03 Digest. cited by other .
Chwang et al., "Thin Film encapsulated flexible organic electroluminescent displays", American Institute of Physics, 2003. cited by other .
Wong, C.P., "Recent Advances in IC Passivation and Encapsulation: Process Techniques and Materials," Polymers for Electronic and Photonic Applications, AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1993, pp. 167-209. cited by other .
De Gryse, R. et al., "Sputtered Transparent Barrier Layers," Tenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, Nov. 1996, pp. 190-198. cited by other .
Shi, M.K., et al., Plasma treatment of PET and acrylic coating surfaces-I, In situ XPS measurements, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, Mar. 2000, 14(12), pp. 1-28. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., "Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes on Flexible Susbtrates" The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, 1995, pp. 0-16. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D., Vacuum Deposited Conductive Polymer Films; The Eleventh International Conference on Vacuum Web Coatings, Nov. 9-11, 1997, pp. 1-13. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al, Ultra High Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Solid Monomer Precursors; 45.sup.th International Symposium of the American Vacuum Society; Nov. 2-6, 1998, pp. 0-26. cited by other .
Norenberg, H. et al., Comparative Study of Oxygen Permeation Through Polymers and Gas Barrier Films, Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000; pp. 347-351; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Yializis, A. et al., Ultra High Barrier Films; Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000, pp. 404-407; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al., Microstructural and Gas Barrier Properties of Transparent Aluminum Oxide and Indium Tin Oxide Films; Denver, Apr. 15-20, 2000; pp. 373-378; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Tropsha et al., Combinatorial Barrier Effect of the Multilayer SiOx Coatings on Polymer Substrates; 1997 Society of Vacuum Coaters, 40.sup.th Annual Technical Conferences Proceedings; Apr. 12-17, 1997; pp. 64-69. cited by other .
Tropsha et al., Activated Rate Theory Treatment of Oxygen and Water Transport through Silicon Oxide/Poly(ethylene terphthalate) Composite Barrier Structures; J. Phys. Chem B Mar. 1997; pp. 2259-2266. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., PML/Oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Differences Arising From Use Of UV Or Electron Beam Polymerization Of The PML Layers, SVC 40.sup.th Annual Technical Conference, Apr. 12-17, 1997, 4 pages only. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., Vacuum Deposited Polymer/metal Multilayer Films for Optical Applications; Paper No. C1.13; International Conference on Metallurgical Coatings; Apr. 15-21, 1995, pp. 1-14. cited by other .
Felts, J.T., Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates; Society of Vacuum Coaters; 36.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 25-30, 1993; pp. 324-331. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., Molecularly Doped Polymer Composite Films for Light Emitting Polymer Application Fabricated by the PML Process; 41.sup.st Technical Conference of the Society of Vacuum Coaters; Apr. 1998; pp. 220-225. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al., Polymer/polymer, Polymer/Oxide, and Polymer/Metal Vacuum Deposited Interference Filters; Tenth International Vacuum Web Coating Conference; Nov. 1996; pp. 0-14. cited by other .
Mahon, J.K. et al, Requirements of Flexible Substrates for Organic Light Emitting Devices in Flat Panel Display Applications, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 42.sup.nd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, Apr. 1999, pp. 456-459. cited by other .
Kukla, R. et al., Transparent Barrier Coatings with EB-Evaporation, an Update; Section Five; Transparent Barrier Coating Papers; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999 pp. 222-233. cited by other .
Hibino, N. et al., Transparent Barrier Al.sub.20.sub.3 Coating By Activated Reactive Evaporation; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 234-246. cited by other .
Bright, Clark I., Transparent Barrier Coatings Based on ITO for Flexible Plastic Displays; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 247-255. cited by other .
Henry, B.M. et al., Microstructural Studies of Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings on Polymer Substrates; Thirteenth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; Oct. 17-19, 1999; pp. 265-273. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultra High Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Liquid/Solid Suspension Monomer Precursors; MRS Conference; Nov. 29-Dec. 3, 1998; Paper No. Y12.1. cited by other .
Affinito, J. D. et al., "Vacuum Deposited Conductive Polymer Films" The Eleventh International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating, no earlier than Feb. 1998, pp. 200-212. cited by other .
Affinito, J. D. et al., "Molecularly Doped Polymer Composite Films for Light Emitting Polymer Applications Fabricated by the PML Process" 41st Technical Conference of Society of Vacuum Coaters, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-6. cited by other .
Bunshah, R. F. et al., "Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings" Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1982, p. 339. cited by other .
Affinito, J. D., Energy Res. Abstr. 18(6), #17171, 1993. cited by other .
Graupner, W. et al.; "High Resolution Color Organic Light Emitting Diode Microdisplay Fabrication Method", SPIE Proceedings; Nov. 6, 2000; pp. 1-9. cited by other .
Czeremuszkin, G. et al.; Permeation Through Defects in Transparent Barrier Coated Plastic Films; 43rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; Apr. 15, 2000; pp. 408-413. cited by other .
Vossen, J.L. et al.; Thin Film Processes; Academic Press, 1978, Part II, Chapter II-1, Glow Discharge Sputter Deposition, pp. 12-63; Part IV, Chapter IV-1 Plasma Deposition of Inorganic Compounds and Chapter IV-2 Glow Discharge Polymerization, pp. 335-397. cited by other .
G. Gustafason, et al.; Flexible light-emitting diodes made from soluble conducting polymers; Letters to Nature; vol. 357; Jun. 11, 1992; pp. 477-479. cited by other .
F.M. Penning; Electrical Discharges in Gases; 1965; pp. 1-51; Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, New York-London-Paris. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D., et al.; High Rate Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes: Journal Vacuum Science Technology A 14(3), May/Jun. 1996. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposition of Polymer Electrolytes On Flexible Substrates, The Ninth International Conference on Vacuum Web Coating; pp. 20-37. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Ultrahigh Rate, Wide Area, Plasma Polymerized Films from High Molecular Weight/Low Vapor Pressure Liquid or Solid Monomer Precursors; Journal Vacuum Science Technology A 17(4); Jul./Aug. 1999; pp. 1974-1981; American Vacuum Society. cited by other .
Shi, M.K. et al.; In situ and real-time monitoring of plasma-induced etching PET and acrylic films, Plasmas and Polymers; Dec. 1999, 494); pp. 1-25. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Molecularly Doped Polymer Composit Films for Light Emitting Polymer Application Fabricated by the PML Process; 41st Technical Conference of the Society of Vacuum Coaters; 1998; pp. 220-225. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Vacuum Deposited Polymer/Metal Multilayer Films for Optical Application; Thin Solid Films 270, 1995; pp. 43-48. cited by other .
Felts, J.T.; Transparent Barrier Coatings Update: Flexible Substrates; pp. 324-331. cited by other .
Phillips, R.W.; Evaporated Dielectric Colorless Films on PET and Opp Exhibiting High Barriers Toward Moisture and Oxygen; Society of Vacuum Coaters; 36th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings; 1993; pp. 293-300. cited by other .
Yamada, Y. et al.; The Properties of a New Transparent and Colorless Barrier Film; 1995; pp. 28-31; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Chahroudi, D.; Transparent Glass Barrier Coatings for Flexible Film Packaging; 1991; pp. 130-133; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Krug, T. et al.; New Developments in Transparent Barrier Coatings; 1993; pp. 302-305; Society Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; PML/Oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Differences Arising From Use Of UV or Electron Beam Polymerization of the PML Layers; Thin Solid Films; Elsevier Science S.A.; vol. 308-309; Oct. 31, 1997; pp. 19-25. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; A new method for fabricating transparent barrier layers, Thin Solid Films 290-291; 1996; pp. 63-67. cited by other .
Affinito, J.D. et al.; Polymer-Oxide Transparent Barrier Layers; SVC 39th Annual Technical Conference; Vacuum Web Coating Session; 1996; pp. 392-397. cited by other .
Hoffmann, G. et al.; Transparent Barrier Coatings by Reactive Evaporation; 1994; pp. 155-160; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E. et al.; Transparent Gas Barrier Coatings Produced by Dual-Frequency PECVD; 1993; pp. 445-449; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Finson, E. et al.; Transparent SiO2 Barrier Coatings: Conversion and Production Status; 1994; pp. 139-143; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Yializis, A. et al.; High Oxygen Barrier Polypropylene Films Using Transparent Acrylate-A2O3 and Opaque Al-Acrylate Coatings; 1995; pp. 95-102; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Shaw, D.G. et al.; Use of Vapor Deposited Acrylate Coatings to Improve the Barrier Properties of Metallized Film; 1994; pp. 240-244; Society of Vacuum Coaters. cited by other .
Clark I. Bright, et al., Transparent Barrier Coatings Based on ITO for Flexible Plastic Displays, Oct. 17-19, 1999, pp. 247-264, Tucson, Arizona. cited by other .
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report Or The Declaration, Mar. 3, 2000, PCT/US99/29853. cited by examiner.

Primary Examiner: Peng; Kuo-Liang
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Parent Case Text

.Iadd.This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/427,138, filed Oct. 25, 1999, entitled "Environmental Barrier Material For Organic Light Emitting Device and Method Of Making," now U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,067, issued Feb. 18, 2003. .Iaddend.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A barrier assembly comprising: at least one barrier stack comprising at least one barrier layer and at least one polymer layer, wherein the at least one barrier stack has an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 23.degree. C. and 0% relative humidity.

2. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein the at least one barrier stack has an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 90% relative humidity.

3. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein the at least one barrier stack has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 0.005 g/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 100% relative humidity.

4. The barrier assembly of claim 1 further comprising a substrate adjacent to the at least one barrier stack.

5. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein the at least one barrier layer is substantially transparent.

6. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of the at least one barrier layer comprises a material selected from metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, metal oxynitrides, metal oxyborides, and combinations thereof.

7. The barrier assembly of claim 6 wherein the metal oxides are selected from silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, indium oxide, tin oxide, indium tin oxide, tantalum oxide, zirconium oxide, niobium oxide, and combinations thereof.

8. The barrier assembly of claim 6 wherein the metal nitrides are selected from aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, boron nitride, and combinations thereof.

9. The barrier assembly of claim 6 wherein the metal oxynitrides are selected from aluminum oxynitride, silicon oxynitride, boron oxynitride, and combinations thereof.

10. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein the at least one barrier layer is substantially opaque.

11. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of the at least one barrier layers is selected from opaque metals, opaque polymers, opaque ceramics, and opaque cermets.

12. The barrier assembly of claim 4 wherein the substrate comprises a flexible substrate material.

13. The barrier assembly of claim 12 wherein the flexible substrate material is selected from polymers, metals, paper, fabric, and combinations thereof.

14. The barrier assembly of claim 4 wherein the substrate comprises a rigid substrate material.

15. The barrier assembly of claim 14 wherein the rigid substrate material is selected from ceramics, metals, and semiconductors.

16. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of the at least one polymer layers comprises an acrylate-containing polymer.

17. The barrier assembly of claim 4 further comprising a polymer smoothing layer adjacent to the substrate.

18. The barrier assembly of claim 4 further comprising a scratch resistant layer adjacent to the substrate.

19. The barrier assembly of claim 4 further comprising an anti-reflective coating adjacent to the substrate.

20. The barrier assembly of claim 4 further comprising an anti-fingerprint coating adjacent to the substrate.

21. The barrier assembly of claim 4 further comprising an anti-static coating adjacent to the substrate.

22. The barrier assembly of claim 1 wherein the at least one barrier layer comprises two barrier layers.

23. The barrier assembly of claim 22 wherein the two barrier layers are made of the same barrier material.

24. The barrier assembly of claim 22 wherein the two barrier layers are made of different barrier materials.

25. The barrier assembly of claim 11 wherein at least one of the at least one barrier layers is opaque cermet selected from zirconium nitride, titanium nitride, hafnium nitride, tantalum nitride, niobium nitride, tungsten disilicide, titanium diboride, and zirconium diboride.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to barrier coatings, and more particularly to barrier coatings having improved barrier properties.

Many different types of products are sensitive to gas and liquids, which can cause deterioration of the product or render it useless, including electronics, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals. Barrier coatings have been included in the packaging for these environmentally sensitive products to protect them from gas and liquid transmission. As used herein, the term environmentally sensitive means products which are subject to degradation caused by permeation of environmental gases or liquids, such as oxygen and water vapor in the atmosphere or chemicals used in the processing, handling, storage, and use of the product.

Plastics are often used in product packaging. However, the gas and liquid permeation resistance of plastics is poor, often several orders of magnitude below what is required for product performance. For example, the oxygen transmission rates for materials such polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are as high as 1550 cc/m.sup.2/day/micron of thickness (or 8.7 cc/m.sup.2/day for 7 mil thickness PET), and the water vapor transmission rates are also in this range. Certain display applications using environmentally sensitive display devices, such as organic light emitting devices, require encapsulation that has a maximum oxygen transmission rate of 10.sup.-4 to 10.sup.-2 cc/m.sup.2/day, and a maximum water vapor transmission rate of 10.sup.-5 to 10.sup.-6 g/m.sup.2/day.

Barrier coatings have been applied to plastic substrates to decrease their gas and liquid permeability. Barrier coatings typically consist of single layer thin film inorganic materials, such as Al, SiO.sub.x, AlO.sub.x, an Si.sub.3N.sub.4 vacuum deposited on polymeric substrates. A single layer coating on PET reduces oxygen permeability to levels of about 0.1 to 1.0 cc/m.sup.2/day, and water vapor permeability to about 0.1 to 1.0 g/m.sup.2/day, which is insufficient for many display devices.

Barrier coatings which include alternating barrier layers and polymeric layers have been developed. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,607,789 and 5,681,666 disclose a moisture barrier for an electrochemical cell tester. However, the claimed moisture barrier ranges from 2 to 15 micrograms/in.sup.2/day which corresponds to a rate of 0.003 to 0.023 g/m.sup.2/day. U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,909 to Shaw et al. discloses a coating for packaging materials which has an acrylate layer and an oxygen barrier layer. The oxygen transmission rate for the coating was reported to be 0.1 cc/m.sup.2/day at 23.degree. C. and the water vapor transmission rate was reported to be 0.01 g/m.sup.2/day in D. G. Shaw and M. G. Langlois, Society of Vacuum Coaters, 37.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, p. 240-244, 1994. The oxygen transmission rates for these coatings are inadequate for many display devices.

Thus, there is a need for an improved, lightweight, barrier coating, and for methods for making such a barrier coating.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention meets these needs by providing a barrier assembly and a method for making such an assembly. The barrier assembly includes at least one barrier stack having at least one barrier layer and at least one polymer layer. The barrier stack has an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 23.degree. C. and 0% relative humidity, and an oxygen transmission rate of less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 90% relative humidity. It also preferably has a water vapor transmission rate of less than 0.005 g/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 100% relative humidity.

Preferably, the barrier layers of the barrier stacks are substantially transparent. At least one of the barrier layers preferably comprises a material selected from metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, metal oxynitrides, metal oxyborides, and combinations thereof.

The barrier layers can be substantially opaque, if desired. The opaque barrier layers are preferably selected from opaque metals, opaque polymers, and opaque ceramics.

The barrier assembly can include a substrate adjacent to the at least one barrier stack. By adjacent, we mean next to, but not necessarily directly next to. There can be additional layers intervening between the adjacent layers. The substrate can either be flexible or rigid. It is preferably made of a flexible substrate material, such as polymers, metals, paper, fabric, and combinations thereof. If a rigid substrate is used, it is preferably a ceramic (including glasses), a metal, or a semiconductor.

The polymer layers of the barrier stacks are preferably acrylate-containing polymers. As used herein, the term acrylate-containing polymers includes acrylate-containing polymers, methacrylate-containing polymers, and combinations thereof The polymer layers can be the same or different.

The barrier assembly can include additional layers if desired, such as polymer smoothing layers, scratch resistant layers, antireflective coatings, or other functional layers.

The present invention also involves a method of making the barrier assembly. The method includes providing a substrate, and placing at least one barrier stack on the substrate. The barrier stack includes at least one barrier layer and at least one polymer layer.

The at least one barrier stack can be placed on the substrate by deposition, preferably vacuum deposition, or by laminating the barrier stack over the environmentally sensitive device. The lamination can be performed using an adhesive, solder, ultrasonic welding, pressure, or heat.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a barrier assembly, and to provide a method of making such a barrier assembly.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-section of one embodiment of the barrier assembly of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a cross-section of an encapsulated device made using the barrier assembly of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the barrier assembly of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The barrier assembly is supported by a substrate 105. The substrate 105 can be either rigid or flexible. A flexible substrate can be any flexible material, including, but not limited to: polymers, for example, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), or high temperature polymers, such as polyether sulfone (PES), polyimides, or Transphan.TM. (a high glass transition temperature cyclic olefin polymer available from Lofo High Tech Film, GMBH or Weil am Rhein, Germany); metal; paper; fabric; and combinations thereof. Rigid substrates are preferably glass, metal, or silicon.

There are scratch resistant layers 110 on either side of the substrate 105 to protect it. When a scratch resistant layer is included, it is preferred that both sides of the substrate have a scratch resistant layer. This helps to balance stresses and prevent deformation of a flexible substrate during processing and use.

On top of the scratch resistant layer 110, there is a polymer smoothing layer 115. The polymer smoothing layer decreases surface roughness, and encapsulates surface defects, such as pits, scratches, and digs. This produces a planarized surface which is ideal for subsequent deposition of layers. Depending on the desired application, there can be additional layers deposited on the substrate 105, such as organic or inorganic layers, planarizing layers, electrode layers, antireflective coatings, and other functional layers. In this way, the substrate can be specifically tailored to different applications.

The first barrier stack 120 is adjacent to the polymer smoothing layer 115. The first barrier stack 120 includes a barrier layer 125 and a polymer layer 130. The first barrier layer 125 includes barrier layers 135 and 140. Barrier layers 135 and 140 can be made of the same barrier material or of different barrier materials.

Although FIG. 1 shows a barrier stack with two barrier layers and one polymer layer, the barrier stacks can have one or more polymer layers and one or more barrier layers. There could be one polymer layer and one barrier layer, there could be one or more polymer layers on one side of one or more barrier layers, or there could be one or more polymer layers on both sides of one or more barrier layers. The important feature is that the barrier stack have at least one polymer layer and at least one barrier layer. The barrier layers and polymer layers in the barrier stack can be made of the same material or of a different material. The barrier layers are typically about 100-400 .ANG. thick, and the polymer layers are typically about 1000-10,000 .ANG. thick.

Although only one barrier stack is shown in FIG. 1, the number of barrier stacks is not limited. The number of barrier stacks needed depends on the substrate material used and the level of permeation resistance needed for the particular application. One or two barrier stacks should provide sufficient barrier properties for some applications. The most stringent applications may require five or more barrier stacks.

There is a transparent conductor 145, such as an indium tin oxide layer, adjacent to the first barrier stack 120. There can be additional overcoat layers on top of the barrier stack, such as organic or inorganic layers, planarizing layers, transparent conductors, antireflective coatings, or other functional layers, if desired. This allows the barrier assembly to be tailored to the application.

FIG. 2 shows a barrier assembly being used to encapsulate an environmentally sensitive display device. The substrate 205 has an environmentally sensitive display device 210 on it. There is a barrier stack 215 over the environmentally sensitive display device 210 encapsulating it. The barrier stack 215 includes a barrier layer 220 and a polymer layer 225.

The environmentally sensitive display device 210 can be any display device which is environmentally sensitive. Examples of environmentally sensitive display devices include, but are not limited to liquid crystal displays (LCDs), light emitting diodes (LEDs), light emitting polymers (LEPs), electronic signage using electrophoretic inks, electroluminescent devices (EDs), and phosphorescent devices. These display devices can be made using known techniques, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,025,899, 5,995,191, 5,994,174, 5,956,112 (LCDs); U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,005,692, 5,821,688, 5,747,928 (LEDs); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,969,711, 5,961,804, 4,026,713 (E Ink); U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,023,373, 6,023,124, 6,023,125 (LEPs); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,023,073, 6,040,812, 6,019,654, 6,018,237, 6,014,119, 6,010,796 (EDs), which are incorporated herein by reference.

The method of making the barrier assembly will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2. Any initial layers which are desired, such as scratch resistant layers, planarizing layers, electrically conductive layers, etc., can be coated, deposited, or otherwise placed on the substrate. A polymer smoothing layer is preferably included to provide a smooth base for the remaining layers. It can be formed by depositing a layer of polymer, for example, an acrylate-containing polymer, onto the substrate or previous layer. The polymer layer can be deposited in vacuum or by using atmospheric processes such as spin coating and/or spraying. Preferably, an acrylate-containing monomer, oligomer, or resin is deposited and then polymerized in situ to form the polymer layer. As used herein, the term acrylate-containing monomer, oligomer, or resin includes acrylate-containing monomers, oligomers, and resins, methacrylate-containing monomers, oligomers, and resins, and combinations thereof.

The barrier stack is then placed on the substrate. The barrier stack includes at least one barrier layer and at least one polymer layer. The barrier stacks are preferably made by vacuum deposition. The barrier layer can be vacuum deposited onto the polymer smoothing layer, the substrate, or the previous layer. The polymer layer is then deposited on the barrier layer, preferably by flash evaporating acrylate-containing monomers, oligomers, or resins, condensing on the barrier layer, and polymerizing in situ in a vacuum chamber. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,440,446 and 5,725,909, which are incorporated herein by reference, describe methods of depositing thin film, barrier stacks.

Vacuum deposition includes flash evaporation of acrylate-containing monomer, oligomer, or resin with in situ polymerization under vacuum, plasma deposition and polymerization of acrylate-containing monomer, oligomer, or resin, as well as vacuum deposition of the barrier layers by sputtering, chemical vapor deposition, plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, evaporation, sublimation, electron cyclotron resonance-plasma enhanced vapor deposition (ECR-PECVD), and combinations thereof.

In order to protect the integrity of the barrier layer, the formation of defects and/or microcracks in the deposited layer subsequent to deposition and prior to downstream processing should be avoided. The barrier assembly is preferably manufactured so that the barrier layers are not directly contacted by any equipment, such as rollers in a web coating system, to avoid defects that may be caused by abrasion over a roll or roller. This can be accomplished by designing the deposition system such that the barrier layers are always covered by polymer layers prior to contacting or touching any handling equipment.

When the barrier stack is being used to encapsulate an environmentally sensitive display device, the substrate can be prepared as described above, and the environmentally sensitive display device placed on the substrate. Alternatively, the environmentally sensitive display device can be placed directly on a substrate (or on a substrate with functional layers, such as planarizing layers, scratch resistant layers, etc.).

The environmentally sensitive display device can be placed on the substrate by deposition, such as vacuum deposition. Alternatively it can be placed on the substrate by lamination. The lamination can use an adhesive, glue, or the like, or heat to seal the environmentally sensitive display device to the substrate.

A barrier stack is then placed over the environmentally sensitive display device to encapsulate it. The second barrier stack can be placed over the environmentally sensitive display device by deposition or lamination.

The barrier layers in the first and second barrier stacks may be any barrier material. The barrier layers in the first and second barrier stacks can be made of the same material or a different material. In addition, multiple barrier layers of the same or different barrier materials can be used in a barrier stack.

The barrier layers can be transparent or opaque, depending on the design of the packaging, and application for which it is to be used. Preferred transparent barrier materials include, but are not limited to, metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides, metal oxynitrides, metal oxyborides, and combinations thereof. The metal oxides are preferably selected from silicon oxide, aluminum oxide, titanium oxide, indium oxide, tin oxide, indium tin oxide, tantalum oxide, zirconium oxide, niobium oxide, and combinations thereof. The metal nitrides are preferably selected from aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, boron nitride, and combinations thereof. The metal oxynitrides are preferably selected from aluminum oxynitride, silicon oxynitride, boron oxynitride, and combinations thereof.

Opaque barrier layers can be also be used in some barrier stacks. Opaque barrier materials include, but are not limited to, metals, ceramics, polymers, and cermets. Examples of opaque cermets include, but are not limited to, zirconium nitride, titanium nitride, hafnium nitride, tantalum nitride, niobium nitride, tungsten disilicide, titanium diboride, and zirconium diboride.

The polymer layers of the first and second barrier stacks are preferably acrylate-containing monomers, oligomers, or resins. The polymer layers in the first and second barrier stacks can be the same or different. In addition, the polymer layers within each barrier stack can be the same or different.

In a preferred embodiment, the barrier stack includes a polymer layer and two barrier layers. The two barrier layers can be made from the same barrier material or from different barrier materials. The thickness of each barrier layer in this embodiment is about one half the thickness of the single barrier layer, or about 50 to 200 .ANG.. There are no limitations on the thickness, however.

When the barrier layers are made of the same material, they can be deposited either by sequential deposition using two sources or by the same source using two passes. If two deposition sources are used, deposition conditions can be different for each source, leading to differences in microstructure and defect dimensions. Any type of deposition source can be used. Different types of deposition processes, such as magnetron sputtering and electron beam evaporation, can be used to deposit the two barrier layers.

The microstructures of the two barrier layers are mismatched as a result of the differing deposition sources/parameters. The barrier layers can even have different crystal structure. For example, Al.sub.2O.sub.3 can exist in different phases (alpha, gamma) with different crystal orientations. The mismatched microstructure can help decouple defects in the adjacent barrier layers, enhancing the tortuous path for gases and water vapor permeation.

When the barrier layers are made of different materials, two deposition sources are needed. This can be accomplished by a variety of techniques. For example, if the materials are deposited by sputtering, sputtering targets of different compositions could be used to obtain thin films of different compositions. Alternatively, two sputtering targets of the same composition could be used but with different reactive gases. Two different types of deposition sources could also be used. In this arrangement, the lattices of the two layers are even more mismatched by the different microstructures and lattice parameters of the two materials.

A single pass, roll-to-roll, vacuum deposition of a three layer combination on a PET substrate, i.e., PET substrate/polymer layer/barrier layer/polymer layer, can be more than five orders of magnitude less permeable to oxygen and water vapor than a single oxide layer on PET alone. See J. D. Afinito, M. E. Gross, C. A. Coronado, G. L. Graff, E. N. Greenwell, and P. M. Martin, Polymer-Oxide Transparent Barrier Layers Produced Using PML Process, 39.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings of the Society of Vacuum Coaters, Vacuum Web Coating Session, 1996, pages 392-397; J. D. Affinito, S. Eufinger, M. E. Gross, G. L. Graff, and P. M. Martin, PML/Oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Difference Arising From Use of UV or Electron Beam Polymerization of the PML Layers, Thin Solid Films, Vol. 308, 1997, pages 19-25. This is in spite of the fact that the effect on the permeation rate of the polymer multilayers (PML) layers alone, without the barrier layer (oxide, metal, nitride, oxynitride) layer, is barely measurable. It is believed that the improvement in barrier properties is due to two factors. First, permeation rates in the roll-to-roll coated oxide-only layers were found to be conductance limited by defects in the oxide layer that arose during deposition and when the coated substrate was wound up over system idlers/rollers. Asperities (high points) in the underlying substrate are replicated in the deposited inorganic barrier layer. These features are subject to mechanical damage during web handling/take-up, and can lead to the formation of defects in the deposited film. These defects seriously limit the ultimate barrier performance of the films. In the single pass, polymer/barrier/polymer process, the first acrylic layer planarizes the substrate and provides an ideal surface for subsequent deposition of the inorganic barrier thin film. The second polymer layer provides a robust "protective" film that minimizes damage to the barrier layer and also planarizes the structure for subsequent barrier layer (or environmentally sensitive display device) deposition. The intermediate polymer layers also decouple defects that exist in adjacent inorganic barrier layers, thus creating a tortuous path for gas diffusion.

The permeability of the barrier stacks used in the present invention is shown in Table 1. The barrier stacks of the present invention on polymeric substrates, such as PET, have measured oxygen transmission rate (OTR) and water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) values well below the detection limits of current industrial instrumentation used for permeation measurements (Mocon OxTran 2/20L and Permatran). Table 1 shows the OTR and WVTR values (measured according to ASTM F 1927-98 and ASTM F 1249-90, respectively) measured at Mocon (Minneapolis, Minn.) for several barrier stacks on 7 mil PET, along with reported values for other materials.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Oxygen Water Vapor Permeation Rate Permeation (cc/m.sup.2/day) (g/m.sup.2/day)* Sample 23.degree. C. 38.degree. C. 23.degree. C. 38.degree. C. Native 7 mil PET 7.62 -- -- -- 1-barrier stack <0.005 <0.005* -- 0.46* 1-barrier stack <0.005 <0.005* -- 0.011* with ITO 2-barrier stacks <0.005 <0.005* -- <0.005* 2-barrier stacks <0.005 <0.005* -- <0.005* with ITO 5-barrier stacks <0.005 <0.005* -- <0.005* 5-barrier stacks <0.005 <0.005* -- <0.005* with ITO DuPont film.sup.1 0.3 -- -- -- (PET/Si.sub.3N.sub.4 or PEN/Si.sub.3N.sub.4) Polaroid.sup.3 <1.0 -- -- -- PET/Al.sup.2 0.6 -- 0.17 -- PET/silicon 0.7-1.5 -- 0.15-0.9 -- oxide.sup.2 Teijin LCD film <2 -- <5 -- (HA grade- TN/STN).sup.3 *38.degree. C., 90% RH, 100% O.sub.2 *38.degree. C., 100% RH .sup.1P. F. Carcia, 46.sup.th International Symposium of the American Vacuum Society, October 1999 .sup.2Langowski, H. C., 39.sup.th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, SVC, pp. 398-401 (1996) .sup.3Technical Data Sheet

As the data in Table 1 shows, the barrier stacks of the present invention provide oxygen and water vapor permeation rates several orders of magnitude better than PET coated with aluminum, silicon oxide, or aluminum oxide. Typical oxygen permeation rates for other barrier coatings range from 1 to about 0.1 cc/m.sup.2/day. The oxygen transmission rate for the barrier stacks of the present invention is less than 0.005 cc/m.sup.2/day at 23.degree. C. and 0% relative humidity, and at 38.degree. C. and 90% relative humidity. The water vapor transmission rate is less than 0.005 g/m.sup.2/day at 38.degree. C. and 100% relative humidity. The actual transmission rates are lower, but cannot be measured with existing equipment.

The barrier assemblies were also tested by encapsulating organic light emitting devices using the barrier stacks of the present invention. The organic light emitting devices are extremely sensitive to water vapor, and they are completely destroyed in the presence of micromole quantities of water vapor. Experimentation and calculations suggest that the water vapor transmission rate through the encapsulation film must be on the order of about 10.sup.-6 to 10.sup.-5 g/m.sup.2/day to provide sufficient barrier protection for acceptable device lifetimes. The experiments/calculations are based on the detrimental hydrolysis reaction of water vapor with the extremely thin (less than 10 nm), low work function, cathode materials (Ca, Mg, Li, LiF). Hydrolysis of the cathode leads to the formation of non-conductive reaction products (such as hydroxides and oxides) that delaminate or blister away from the electron transport layers of the organic light emitting devices, resulting in the formation of dark spots on the device.

The organic light emitting devices encapsulated in the barrier stacks of the present invention have been in operation for over six months and without measurable degradation. The extrapolated lifetime for the encapsulated devices exceeds the required 10,000 hours necessary to satisfy industry standards. The barrier stacks are extremely effective in preventing oxygen and water penetration to the underlying components, substantially outperforming other thin-film barrier coatings on the market.

The preferred deposition process is compatible with a wide variety of substrates. Because the preferred process involves flash evaporation of a monomer and magnetron sputtering, deposition temperatures are well below 100.degree. C., and stresses in the coating can be minimized. Multilayer coatings can be deposited at high deposition rates. No harsh gases or chemicals are used, and the process can be scaled up to large substrates and wide webs. The barrier properties of the coating can be tailored to the application by controlling the number of layers, the materials, and the layer design. Thus, the present invention provides a barrier stack with the exceptional barrier properties necessary for hermetic sealing of an environmentally sensitive display device, or other environmentally sensitive device. It permits the production of an encapsulated environmentally sensitive display device.

While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in the compositions and methods disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.

* * * * *