Bidet

Kergoet July 26, 2

Patent Grant D958945

U.S. patent number D958,945 [Application Number D/758,477] was granted by the patent office on 2022-07-26 for bidet. This patent grant is currently assigned to KOHLER CO.. The grantee listed for this patent is Kohler Co.. Invention is credited to Francois Kergoet.


United States Patent D958,945
Kergoet July 26, 2022

Bidet

Claims

CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for a bidet, as shown and described.
Inventors: Kergoet; Francois (Malakoff, FR)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Kohler Co.

Kohler

WI

US
Assignee: KOHLER CO. (Kohler, WI)
Appl. No.: D/758,477
Filed: November 16, 2020

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29648007 May 17, 2018 D913458

Current U.S. Class: D23/309
Current International Class: 2302
Field of Search: ;D23/295-303,309,311-313

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D116564 September 1939 Love
D202411 September 1965 Niemann
3578737 May 1971 Ruggles
D222541 November 1971 Van Skyhawk
D226910 May 1973 Doman
D309939 August 1990 Yvetot
D328338 July 1992 Ragonot
D349156 July 1994 Kohler, Jr. et al.
D354341 January 1995 Kohler, Jr. et al.
D369855 May 1996 Reid
D379217 May 1997 Kergoet
D384404 September 1997 Kergoet
D385957 November 1997 Laguera Garza
D394308 May 1998 Bertoli
5755498 May 1998 Cutler
D406324 March 1999 Johnson
D406325 March 1999 Nagato
D406326 March 1999 Tani
D428122 July 2000 Garza
D433741 November 2000 Singer
D434124 November 2000 McKeone
D445884 July 2001 Marshall et al.
D455202 April 2002 Soulier
D455477 April 2002 Soulier
D472616 April 2003 Newson
D492396 June 2004 Sutopo
D496444 September 2004 Kergoet
D520613 May 2006 Soulier
D529147 September 2006 Sutopo
D531714 November 2006 Soulier
D532494 November 2006 Mukai
D547844 July 2007 Mukai
D556870 December 2007 Lin et al.
D556872 December 2007 Crowther et al.
D571900 June 2008 Daikubara
D596276 July 2009 Espinoza
D598990 August 2009 Duringer et al.
D606178 December 2009 Cummings et al.
D609791 February 2010 Cummings et al.
D610660 February 2010 Slothower
D624992 October 2010 Maitre et al.
D624997 October 2010 Schonherr et al.
D634408 March 2011 Thomas
D634821 March 2011 Thomas
D638525 May 2011 Matsuura et al.
D646366 October 2011 Palomba et al.
D652492 January 2012 Slothower et al.
D654576 February 2012 Cornille
D654993 February 2012 Ando
D657031 April 2012 Bickerstaffe et al.
D663017 July 2012 Slothower et al.
D667941 September 2012 Bickerstaffe et al.
D697598 January 2014 Garland
D699823 February 2014 Newson
D727478 April 2015 Mayer et al.
D728082 April 2015 Sukhera et al.
8997271 April 2015 Bayley
D743515 November 2015 Letourneau
D745647 December 2015 Schonherr et al.
D759795 June 2016 Letourneau et al.
D764033 August 2016 Chuk et al.
D767743 September 2016 Reid et al.
D782634 March 2017 Reid et al.
D796652 September 2017 Vish et al.
D798424 September 2017 Mesun et al.
D801491 October 2017 Stevenson et al.
D802105 November 2017 Stevenson et al.
D802106 November 2017 Stevenson et al.
D807479 January 2018 Chuk et al.
D807480 January 2018 Chuk et al.
D823999 July 2018 Stevenson et al.
D835762 December 2018 Levi
D888908 June 2020 Kergoet
D888909 June 2020 Kergoet
D913458 March 2021 Kergoet
D913459 March 2021 Kergoet
2006/0284526 December 2006 Pathmanathan et al.
2018/0070722 March 2018 Yang et al.

Other References

CN First Office Action CN Appl No. 201830613467.2; dated Jan. 15, 2019; 1 page. cited by applicant .
Decision of Rejection dated Apr. 9, 2019. cited by applicant .
First Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2019. cited by applicant .
First Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2019. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Voytek; John A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Foley & Lardner LLP

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the claimed design;

FIG. 2 is a front view of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a rear view of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a side view of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is another side view of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a top view of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 7 is a bottom view of FIG. 1.

The broken lines in the drawings are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design. Broken lines formed of unequal length dashes (i.e., dash-dot) define bounds of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed