Aerial vehicle

Kim , et al. December 8, 2

Patent Grant D904279

U.S. patent number D904,279 [Application Number D/714,105] was granted by the patent office on 2020-12-08 for aerial vehicle. This patent grant is currently assigned to SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Peng Bin, Min Kim, Siyoon Kim, Tianhang Ma, Guisheng Nong, Lei Zhang.


United States Patent D904,279
Kim ,   et al. December 8, 2020

Aerial vehicle

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an aerial vehicle, as shown and described.
Inventors: Kim; Min (Shenzhen, CN), Kim; Siyoon (Shenzhen, CN), Nong; Guisheng (Shenzhen, CN), Zhang; Lei (Shenzhen, CN), Bin; Peng (Shenzhen, CN), Ma; Tianhang (Shenzhen, CN)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen

N/A

CN
Assignee: SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, CN)
Appl. No.: D/714,105
Filed: November 21, 2019

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29600615 Apr 13, 2017 D869375

Current U.S. Class: D12/328
Current International Class: 1207
Field of Search: ;D12/1-4,16.1,319-345 ;D21/301,436,441,442,443,444,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454,455

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D628658 December 2010 Wurm
D691514 October 2013 Wang et al.
D710454 August 2014 Barajas
D745435 December 2015 Park et al.
D759764 June 2016 Lai
D760848 July 2016 McKenna et al.
D763134 August 2016 Wang
D768539 October 2016 Lee
D772991 November 2016 Caubel
D777263 January 2017 Lavagen et al.
9567076 February 2017 Zhang
D782366 March 2017 Xiao
D784202 April 2017 Park
D784854 April 2017 Huang et al.
D785541 May 2017 Du et al.
D795742 August 2017 Li
D795967 August 2017 Haley et al.
D796586 September 2017 Chen et al.
D798961 October 2017 Li
D806606 January 2018 Morrison
D809992 February 2018 Hu et al.
D810653 February 2018 Hu et al.
D813724 March 2018 Hu
D814385 April 2018 Zhao
D814970 April 2018 Chen
D814971 April 2018 Huang et al.
D816546 May 2018 Wang
D816582 May 2018 Liang et al.
D817850 May 2018 Xiao
D818872 May 2018 Ho
D818874 May 2018 Tian et al.
D819749 June 2018 Caubel
D820158 June 2018 Jeong et al.
D821263 June 2018 Goldy
D825379 August 2018 Gury et al.
D825380 August 2018 Tompkin
D825381 August 2018 Meugnier et al.
D825669 August 2018 Tompkin
D827723 September 2018 Barajas
D827724 September 2018 Barajas et al.
D828222 September 2018 Yu
D830229 October 2018 Lutterodt et al.
D830896 October 2018 Lutterodt et al.
D831538 October 2018 Gan
D843267 March 2019 Gao
D843921 March 2019 Shi
D849154 May 2019 Zhao
D849845 May 2019 Zhao
D850978 June 2019 Gao
D852091 June 2019 Tompkin
D852673 July 2019 Chen
D853279 July 2019 Gan
D854448 July 2019 Chen
10343785 July 2019 Reese et al.
D857105 August 2019 Zhang
D860048 September 2019 Caubel
D861573 October 2019 He
D866396 November 2019 Chen
D869375 December 2019 Kim
D873175 January 2020 Li
D874338 February 2020 Zhao
D874973 February 2020 Zhou
D874974 February 2020 Zhou
D881067 April 2020 Zhou
D882460 April 2020 Chen
D883140 May 2020 Chen
D884554 May 2020 Chen
D887340 June 2020 He
2017/0144751 May 2017 Yu
2017/0144753 May 2017 Yu
2017/0183074 June 2017 Hutson et al.
2017/0221395 August 2017 Benatar
2018/0093768 April 2018 Castleman et al.
2018/0111685 April 2018 Tian et al.
2018/0149947 May 2018 Kim
2018/0183496 June 2018 Gasnier et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
303142773 Mar 2015 CN
303247577 Jun 2015 CN
303452142 Nov 2015 CN
303478219 Dec 2015 CN
303669590 May 2016 CN
303711586 Jun 2016 CN
303718283 Jun 2016 CN
303754702 Jul 2016 CN
303790997 Aug 2016 CN
303804559 Aug 2016 CN
303815214 Aug 2016 CN
303853849 Sep 2016 CN
303958521 Dec 2016 CN
304028561 Feb 2017 CN
304203372 Jul 2017 CN
304203375 Jul 2017 CN
304203376 Jul 2017 CN
D1565537 Dec 2016 JP
30-0876675 Oct 2016 KR

Other References

Dji Spark vs Dji Mavic Pro Comparison. dated Oct. 28, 2017. found online [Jul. 23, 2019] https://www.mydronesreview.com/2017/05/dji-spark-vs-dji-mavic-pro-compari- son.html. cited by examiner .
Oji Spark vs Oji Mavic Pro Comparison. dated Oct. 28, 2017. https://www.mydronesreview.com/2017/05/dji-spark-vs-dji-mavic-pro-compari- son.html. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Cash; Marissa J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a top front perspective view of an aerial vehicle showing the claimed design;

FIG. 2 is a bottom rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a right side view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a top view thereof; and,

FIG. 8 is a bottom view thereof.

The broken lines in the figures show portions of the aerial vehicle that form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *

References

Patent Diagrams and Documents

D00000


D00001


D00002


D00003


D00004


D00005


D00006


XML


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed