U.S. patent number D904,279 [Application Number D/714,105] was granted by the patent office on 2020-12-08 for aerial vehicle.
This patent grant is currently assigned to SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Peng Bin, Min Kim, Siyoon Kim, Tianhang Ma, Guisheng Nong, Lei Zhang.
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00000.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00001.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00002.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00003.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00004.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00005.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0904279/USD0904279-20201208-D00006.png)
United States Patent |
D904,279 |
Kim , et al. |
December 8, 2020 |
Aerial vehicle
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an aerial vehicle, as shown and
described.
Inventors: |
Kim; Min (Shenzhen,
CN), Kim; Siyoon (Shenzhen, CN), Nong;
Guisheng (Shenzhen, CN), Zhang; Lei (Shenzhen,
CN), Bin; Peng (Shenzhen, CN), Ma;
Tianhang (Shenzhen, CN) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. |
Shenzhen |
N/A |
CN |
|
|
Assignee: |
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
(Shenzhen, CN)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/714,105 |
Filed: |
November 21, 2019 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
29600615 |
Apr 13, 2017 |
D869375 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
D12/328 |
Current International
Class: |
1207 |
Field of
Search: |
;D12/1-4,16.1,319-345
;D21/301,436,441,442,443,444,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454,455 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303142773 |
|
Mar 2015 |
|
CN |
|
303247577 |
|
Jun 2015 |
|
CN |
|
303452142 |
|
Nov 2015 |
|
CN |
|
303478219 |
|
Dec 2015 |
|
CN |
|
303669590 |
|
May 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303711586 |
|
Jun 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303718283 |
|
Jun 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303754702 |
|
Jul 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303790997 |
|
Aug 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303804559 |
|
Aug 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303815214 |
|
Aug 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303853849 |
|
Sep 2016 |
|
CN |
|
303958521 |
|
Dec 2016 |
|
CN |
|
304028561 |
|
Feb 2017 |
|
CN |
|
304203372 |
|
Jul 2017 |
|
CN |
|
304203375 |
|
Jul 2017 |
|
CN |
|
304203376 |
|
Jul 2017 |
|
CN |
|
D1565537 |
|
Dec 2016 |
|
JP |
|
30-0876675 |
|
Oct 2016 |
|
KR |
|
Other References
Dji Spark vs Dji Mavic Pro Comparison. dated Oct. 28, 2017. found
online [Jul. 23, 2019]
https://www.mydronesreview.com/2017/05/dji-spark-vs-dji-mavic-pro-compari-
son.html. cited by examiner .
Oji Spark vs Oji Mavic Pro Comparison. dated Oct. 28, 2017.
https://www.mydronesreview.com/2017/05/dji-spark-vs-dji-mavic-pro-compari-
son.html. cited by applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Cash; Marissa J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein &
Fox P.L.L.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top front perspective view of an aerial vehicle showing
the claimed design;
FIG. 2 is a bottom rear perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 7 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 8 is a bottom view thereof.
The broken lines in the figures show portions of the aerial vehicle
that form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References