Shoe
Seamarks Feb
U.S. patent number D875,365 [Application Number D/637,557] was granted by the patent office on 2020-02-18 for shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Karl Seamarks.
| United States Patent | D875,365 |
| Seamarks | February 18, 2020 |
Shoe
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Seamarks; Karl (Portland, OR) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/637,557 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | February 20, 2018 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/953; D2/951 |
| Current International Class: | 0204 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,906,908,916,918,925,946-962,977 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,28,32R,34R,59C,67A,103 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1560995 | November 1925 | Kaplan |
| 4096649 | June 1978 | Saurwein |
| D369235 | April 1996 | Senda |
| D387547 | December 1997 | Seydel |
| D391045 | February 1998 | Assous |
| D395744 | July 1998 | Edington |
| 5836094 | November 1998 | Figel |
| 6711834 | March 2004 | Kita |
| D513840 | January 2006 | Urie |
| D593740 | June 2009 | McClaskie |
| D712643 | September 2014 | Seo |
| D716535 | November 2014 | Seo |
| D719334 | December 2014 | Lindner |
| D793047 | August 2017 | Rasmussen |
| D838952 | January 2019 | McMillan |
| D839568 | February 2019 | McMillan |
| 10271613 | April 2019 | Campos, II |
| D848717 | May 2019 | Case |
| D849377 | May 2019 | Case |
| D849378 | May 2019 | Case |
| 10299536 | May 2019 | Ernst |
| D854294 | July 2019 | McMillan |
| D858964 | September 2019 | Vestuti |
| D859799 | September 2019 | Vestuti |
| D860612 | September 2019 | Shyllon |
| D862854 | October 2019 | Boudreau |
| D862855 | October 2019 | Gerig |
| 2012/0204449 | August 2012 | Stockbridge |
| 2013/0145650 | June 2013 | Seo |
| 2014/0259790 | September 2014 | Faggin |
| 2016/0073732 | March 2016 | Ernst |
| 2017/0119096 | May 2017 | Greene |
| 2017/0265565 | September 2017 | Connell |
| 2017/0265566 | September 2017 | Case |
| 2018/0303201 | October 2018 | Greene |
| 2019/0082786 | March 2019 | Cortez |
| 2019/0110552 | April 2019 | Case |
Other References
|
Nike Air Max Sequent 3 Mens Running Shoe, amazon.com, May 23, 2017, 5 pages. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Sequent-Running-University-Red-Wolf-Shoes/dp/B06XV- 1BDN4/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1522056413&sr=8-7&keywords=air+max+sequent. cited by applicant. |
Primary Examiner: Nelson; T Chase
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shook, Hardy and Bacon L.L.P.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, first side perspective view of a shoe showing my design;
FIG. 2 is a plan view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a front, second side perspective view thereof.
The even-length broken lines are directed to environment, represent unclaimed subject matter, and form no part of the claimed design. The unshaded areas within the solid lines form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
amazon.com/Sequent-Running-University-Red-Wolf-Shoes/dp/B06XV1BDN4/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1522056413&sr=8-7&keywords=air+max+sequentD00000
D00001
D00002
D00003
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 