U.S. patent number D874,679 [Application Number D/638,675] was granted by the patent office on 2020-02-04 for office alcove workspace.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Attendance on Demand, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Attendance on Demand, Inc.. Invention is credited to Christopher Ciapala.
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00000.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00001.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00002.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00003.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00004.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00005.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00006.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00007.png)
![](/patent/grant/D0874679/USD0874679-20200204-D00008.png)
United States Patent |
D874,679 |
Ciapala |
February 4, 2020 |
Office alcove workspace
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an office alcove workspace, as
shown and described.
Inventors: |
Ciapala; Christopher
(Farmington Hills, MI) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Attendance on Demand, Inc. |
Northville |
MI |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Attendance on Demand, Inc.
(Northville, MI)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/638,675 |
Filed: |
February 28, 2018 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D25/58 |
Current International
Class: |
2502 |
Field of
Search: |
;D25/1-35,55-61
;52/239 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Miller; Brett
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Young Basile Hanlon &
MacFarlane, P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is an upper, front, left perspective view of a first
embodiment of an office alcove workspace showing the office alcove
workspace door in an open position and configured with exemplary
transparent upper side wall panels and opaque lower side wall
panels.
FIG. 2 is left-side elevation view of the office alcove workspace
of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is rear elevation view of the office alcove workspace of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a right-side elevation view of the office alcove
workspace of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view of the office alcove workspace of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a top view of the office alcove workspace of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is an upper, front, left perspective view of the office
alcove workspace of FIG. 1 showing the office alcove workspace door
in an alternate closed position.
FIG. 8 is a left-side elevation view of a second embodiment of the
office alcove workspace of FIG. 1 alternately showing the left side
wall configured with transparent upper and lower side wall panels.
A right-side elevation view of the second embodiment of the office
alcove workspace is a mirror image of FIG. 8 and is not separately
illustrated.
FIG. 9 is a left-side elevation view of a third embodiment of the
office alcove workspace of FIG. 1 alternately showing the left side
wall configured with opaque upper and lower side wall panels. A
right-side elevation view of the third embodiment of the office
alcove workspace is a mirror image of FIG. 9 and is not separately
illustrated.
FIG. 10 is an upper, front, right perspective view of an alternate
fourth embodiment of the office alcove workspace which is a mirror
image of FIG. 1. FIG. 10 showing the office alcove workspace
configured for the workspace entrance/exit door opening to be
adjacent the right side wall and the door shown in an open
position; and,
FIG. 11 is an upper, front, right perspective view of the office
alcove workspace of FIG. 10 showing the office alcove workspace
door in an alternate closed position which is a mirror image of the
office alcove workspace of FIG. 7.
The ornamental design which is claimed is shown in solid lines in
the drawings. The broken lines in the drawings form no part of the
claimed design. Broken lines formed by equal length dashes (i.e.,
dash-dash) show unclaimed portions of the design. Broken lines
formed of unequal length dashes (i.e., dash-dot) at the outer ends
of individual components having a jagged element show boundaries
between claimed and unclaimed portions of the design. Illustrated
features of the ornamental design include a symbolic break in the
length. The appearance of any portion of the feature between the
respective break lines forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *