Electronic device for musical instrument
Graham Dec
U.S. patent number D870,199 [Application Number D/634,263] was granted by the patent office on 2019-12-17 for electronic device for musical instrument. The grantee listed for this patent is Roger William Graham. Invention is credited to Roger William Graham.
| United States Patent | D870,199 |
| Graham | December 17, 2019 |
Electronic device for musical instrument
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an electronic device for musical instrument, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Graham; Roger William (Santa Barbara, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/634,263 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | January 19, 2018 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29524511 | Apr 21, 2015 | D817386 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D17/99 |
| Current International Class: | 1799 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/217 ;D17/20,99 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D189619 | January 1961 | Barradass et al. |
| D220268 | March 1971 | Kliewer et al. |
| D235779 | July 1975 | Barr et al. |
| D236212 | August 1975 | Beigel et al. |
| D244215 | May 1977 | Ross |
| D315144 | March 1991 | Dard |
| 5022305 | June 1991 | Butler |
| D355656 | February 1995 | Coppersmith |
| D368270 | March 1996 | Jue |
| 5627336 | May 1997 | Stevens |
| D421621 | March 2000 | Cooper |
| 6215055 | April 2001 | Saravis |
| D504458 | April 2005 | Edwards |
| D518086 | March 2006 | Ito |
| 7476799 | January 2009 | Purchon |
| 7711442 | May 2010 | Ryle |
| D630616 | January 2011 | Vex |
| D682346 | May 2013 | Bogdan |
| 8525015 | September 2013 | Armstrong |
| 8609973 | December 2013 | D'Amours |
| D752130 | March 2016 | Alstad |
| D758350 | June 2016 | Mulumudi |
| D769363 | October 2016 | Chou |
| D771594 | November 2016 | Hong |
| D778980 | February 2017 | Myers |
| D781267 | March 2017 | Hirabayashi |
| D782566 | March 2017 | Faoro |
| D791859 | July 2017 | Graham |
| D795841 | August 2017 | Mistry |
| D817386 | May 2018 | Graham |
| 9972295 | May 2018 | Lee |
| D831003 | October 2018 | Suzuki |
| D832822 | November 2018 | Cho |
| 10127899 | November 2018 | Perez |
| D836579 | December 2018 | Gannon |
| D836708 | December 2018 | Juszkiewicz |
| 2007/0234880 | October 2007 | Adams |
| 2008/0173164 | July 2008 | Francis |
| 2009/0199700 | August 2009 | Goldstein |
| 2012/0297963 | November 2012 | Armstrong |
| 2014/0123839 | May 2014 | Gadol, III |
| 2014/0205113 | July 2014 | Slipp |
| 2015/0161978 | June 2015 | Packouz |
| 2016/0063976 | March 2016 | Wilk |
| 2016/0258574 | September 2016 | Abbate |
| 2017/0316766 | November 2017 | Perez |
Assistant Examiner: Reinholdt, Jr.; Steven B
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Graham; Roger W.
Description
FIG. 1 is a top view of the electronic device for musical instrument illustrating my new ornamental design;
FIG. 2 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front view thereof; and,
FIG. 5 is a rear view thereof.
The broken lines depict portions of the electronic device for musical instrument that form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
D00000
D00001
D00002
D00003
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 