Case for electronic device

Kim Oc

Patent Grant D864937

U.S. patent number D864,937 [Application Number D/612,026] was granted by the patent office on 2019-10-29 for case for electronic device. This patent grant is currently assigned to SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD.. The grantee listed for this patent is SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD.. Invention is credited to Dae-Young Kim.


United States Patent D864,937
Kim October 29, 2019

Case for electronic device

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a case for electronic device, as shown and described.
Inventors: Kim; Dae-Young (Seoul, KR)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD.

Seoul

N/A

KR
Assignee: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD. (Seoul, KR)
Appl. No.: D/612,026
Filed: July 27, 2017

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29593707 Feb 10, 2017 D807338
29568017 Jun 14, 2016 D788760
29568020 Jun 14, 2016 D791116
29568021 Jun 14, 2016 D786233
29495236 Jun 27, 2014 D771607

Current U.S. Class: D14/250
Current International Class: 1403
Field of Search: ;D14/250-253,440,203.3-203.7,217,496,248,238.1,240,447,230,247,341,345,346,439 ;D3/201,218,269,301,273,303 ;D13/103,107-108

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D565291 April 2008 Brandenburg et al.
D609463 February 2010 Bullen
D621822 August 2010 Richardson et al.
D624064 September 2010 Esposito
D624910 October 2010 Richardson et al.
D644218 August 2011 Akana et al.
D657782 April 2012 Biller
D659691 May 2012 Kim et al.
D662092 June 2012 Bau
D676845 February 2013 Melanson et al.
D677249 March 2013 Li et al.
D677251 March 2013 Melanson et al.
D682260 May 2013 Tages et al.
D684150 June 2013 Goradesky et al.
D685361 July 2013 Goradesky et al.
D689852 September 2013 Azoulay
8681491 March 2014 Cruz et al.
D703652 April 2014 Melanson
D703654 April 2014 Melanson et al.
D703655 April 2014 Melanson
D714274 September 2014 Jung et al.
D714278 September 2014 Case et al.
D721685 January 2015 Hasbrook et al.
D729218 May 2015 Wilson et al.
D732498 June 2015 Huang
D736205 August 2015 Park
D739391 September 2015 Chen
9143181 September 2015 Jia et al.
D741279 October 2015 Tai
D741844 October 2015 Rayner
D741845 October 2015 Kim
D743389 November 2015 Akana
D743931 November 2015 Hubbard
D744471 December 2015 Fitzgerald
D746273 December 2015 Herbst
D746275 December 2015 Mohammad
D746801 January 2016 Pan
D746805 January 2016 Kim
D747306 January 2016 Kim
D748614 February 2016 Qing
D749555 February 2016 Poon et al.
D749563 February 2016 Akana
D749567 February 2016 Lee
D749591 February 2016 Akana
9247795 February 2016 Kim
D752037 March 2016 Akana
9295174 March 2016 Witter
9301414 March 2016 Chao
D753099 April 2016 Kim
D753641 April 2016 Roberts
D754651 April 2016 Roberts
D754652 April 2016 Roberts
D756340 May 2016 Babichenko
D756978 May 2016 Addonisio
D775112 December 2016 Hemesath et al.
2014/0051488 February 2014 Chung

Other References

"SGP iPhone 4 Case Neo Hybrid Matte Series Gun Metal", https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B004F1IQ7E, Date first available at Amazon.co.uk of Dec. 3, 2010. cited by applicant .
"SGP Neo Hybrid Matte Series Case for the iPhone 4", https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOH74451I-8, Published on Sep. 22, 2010. cited by applicant .
"Spigen Slim Armor iPhone SE / 5S / 5 Case with Advanced Drop Protection and Dual Layer Design for iPhone SE / iPhone 5S / iPhone 5--Metal Slate", https://www.amazon.com/Spigen-iPhone-Advanced-Protection-Design/dp/B00DD6- 2R40, Earliest review date of Dec. 14, 2012, Downloaded on Sep. 18, 2018. cited by applicant .
Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Oct. 29, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of Califomia. cited by applicant .
Declaration of Benjamin A. Campbell in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Oct. 29, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Declaration of Dae-Young Kim in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Covenant Not to Sue Re: Certain Claims of '283 Patent and '099 Patent, filed Nov. 21, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Nov. 21, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Nov. 28, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [175]; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [167]; and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Fourth Amended Complaint [172]., dated Dec. 12, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Judgment, dated Dec. 20, 2018, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant .
Plaintiff Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.'s Notice of Appeal, filed Jan. 16, 2019, in Spigen Korea Co., LTD vs. Ultraproof, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01161 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Thurman; Holly E
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Chae; Heedong Lucem, PC

Description



FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a case for electronic device showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is another front perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 9 is a bottom plan view thereof.

The broken lines depict of unclaimed environment and form no part of the claimed design. The dash-dot lines in the figure drawings represent the bounds of the claimed design.

* * * * *

References

Patent Diagrams and Documents

D00000


D00001


D00002


D00003


D00004


D00005


D00006


D00007


D00008


D00009


XML


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed