U.S. patent number D861,185 [Application Number 35/504,603] was granted by the patent office on 2019-09-24 for massage device. The grantee listed for this patent is WELLNESS TOOLS GROUP OY. Invention is credited to Jesse Ala-Lahti, Jarmo Juhani Pihlavamaki.
United States Patent | D861,185 |
Pihlavamaki , et al. | September 24, 2019 |
Inventors: | Pihlavamaki; Jarmo Juhani (Jyvaskyla, FI), Ala-Lahti; Jesse (Jyvaskyla, FI) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
Appl. No.: | 35/504,603 | ||||||||||
Filed: | September 11, 2017 |
Int'l Reg. No. | Int'l Reg. Date | Int'l Reg. Publication Date |
Hague Int'l Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
DM/097906 | Sep 11, 2017 | Mar 16, 2018 | Sep 11, 2017 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/214 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/200,214-215 |
D665090 | August 2012 | Tucker |
8801642 | August 2014 | Slominski |
D731072 | June 2015 | van den Dries |
D754869 | April 2016 | Stock |
D757281 | May 2016 | Hsieh |
D791962 | July 2017 | Fiore |
D792600 | July 2017 | van den Dries |
D792601 | July 2017 | van den Dries |
D827848 | September 2018 | Iwagami |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.