Sunglasses

Description

FIG. 1 is a front, top, and left perspective view of sunglasses showing the new design;

FIG. 2 is a rear, bottom, and right perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 8 is a bottom plan view thereof.

The broken lines in the figures are shown for the purpose of illustrating portions of the sunglasses that form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for sunglasses, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Boinnard; Ludovic Francis (San Diego, CA), Blanchard; Marc Guy (Solana Beach, CA), Mage; Jerome Jacques Marie (Los Angeles, CA), Marcassa; Claudio (Bodio Lomnago, IT)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type 100% SPEEDLAB, LLC San Diego CA US
Assignee:	100% SPEEDLAB, LLC (San Diego, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/630,152
Filed:	December 19, 2017

---

Current U.S. Class:	D16/315
Current International Class:	1606
Field of Search:	;D16/101,300-342 ;D14/372 ;D29/109-110 ;351/41,42,44,45-46,48-49,59,61,63,66,67,69,71,72,76,77,78,83,87,88,93,94,99-104,110-113,124-126,130-132,136-137,140-153 ;2/13,15,426-432,447-449,441,434-437

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

3517393	June 1970	Beauchef
4425669	January 1984	Grendol et al.
4730915	March 1988	Jannard
4785481	November 1988	Palmer, III et al.
4824233	April 1989	Jannard
4977627	December 1990	Metcalfe et al.
D330903	November 1992	Jannard
5363512	November 1994	Grabos, Jr. et al.
D354971	January 1995	Mugnier
5379464	January 1995	Schleger et al.
D357268	April 1995	Iida
5444876	August 1995	Cooper et al.
5455639	October 1995	Magdelaine et al.
5517700	May 1996	Hoffman
5519896	May 1996	Ford
D377802	February 1997	Leonardi
5610668	March 1997	Mage
5898468	April 1999	Mage
6029271	February 2000	Banuchi
6076196	June 2000	Masumoto
6138285	October 2000	Robrahn et al.
6196676	March 2001	Tabacchi
6227664	May 2001	Pavlak
6257719	July 2001	Pavlak
6513171	February 2003	Soper
6601240	August 2003	Tsubooka
6611966	September 2003	Yamamoto et al.
6637038	October 2003	Hussey
6665885	December 2003	Masumoto
D533889	December 2006	Saderholm et al.
D542829	May 2007	Hsu
D546868	July 2007	Teng
D577054	September 2008	Moritz
D578562	October 2008	Moritz
D622303	August 2010	Thixton
7891025	February 2011	Kobayashi et al.
D640724	June 2011	Goodman
D694312	November 2013	Mage
D694806	December 2013	Mage
D711960	August 2014	Mage et al.
D727398	April 2015	Blanchard et al.
D727400	April 2015	Blanchard
D756446	May 2016	Yoo
2002/0023292	February 2002	Masumoto
2003/0035082	February 2003	Olney
2005/0179856	August 2005	Van Atta et al.
2008/0189838	August 2008	Mage
2009/0077722	March 2009	Welchel et al.
2010/0225879	September 2010	Pulito
2011/0258760	October 2011	Renaud-goud et al.
2014/0063438	March 2014	Cater et al.
2014/0157496	June 2014	Ginther et al.
2014/0208489	July 2014	Blanchard et al.
2015/0074880	March 2015	Blanchard et al.

Other References

Oakley Jawbreakers vs 100% Speedtrap, reviewed Dec. 5, 2017, [online], [site visited Dec. 18, 2018]. Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vzk43OnWce0> (Year: 2017). cited by examiner.

Primary Examiner: Wilson; Michelle E.
Assistant Examiner: Paul; Sanjeev
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Haynes and Boone, LLP

Images