Shoe

Greenhalgh

Patent Grant D852487

U.S. patent number D852,487 [Application Number D/656,058] was granted by the patent office on 2019-07-02 for shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to Reebok International Limited. The grantee listed for this patent is Reebok International Limited. Invention is credited to John S. Greenhalgh.


United States Patent D852,487
Greenhalgh July 2, 2019

Shoe

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe, as shown and described.
Inventors: Greenhalgh; John S. (Foxboro, MA)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Reebok International Limited

London

N/A

GB
Assignee: Reebok International Limited (London, GB)
Appl. No.: D/656,058
Filed: July 10, 2018

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29553633 Feb 3, 2016 D824651
29450748 Feb 9, 2016 D748904

Current U.S. Class: D2/969
Current International Class: 0204
Field of Search: ;D2/896,902,905,906,907,908,929,943,944,945,969,972,977 ;36/83,113,114,115,126-131,3A,45,46.5,57

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
4616432 October 1986 Bunch et al.
4785558 November 1988 Shiomura
D319723 September 1991 Greene
D391752 March 1998 von Conta
D401047 November 1998 Serna
6910288 June 2005 Dua
D554845 November 2007 Caine
D561451 February 2008 Belley et al.
D570084 June 2008 Henderson
D577888 October 2008 Horne et al.
D636575 April 2011 Raysse
D644017 August 2011 Yi
D662299 June 2012 Raysse
D662302 June 2012 Teng-Lee
D677874 March 2013 Hardman
8429835 April 2013 Dojan et al.
D681931 May 2013 Raysse
D683124 May 2013 Raasch
D687218 August 2013 Teng-Lee
D688857 September 2013 Teng-Lee
D701384 March 2014 Leleu
D702930 April 2014 Rademacher
D702931 April 2014 Raysse
D707939 July 2014 McCourt
D707940 July 2014 Lonigan
D713630 September 2014 Lonigan
D722760 February 2015 Lane
D726401 April 2015 Teeter
D748904 February 2016 Greenhalgh
D765376 September 2016 de Costa Pereira Machado
D789068 June 2017 Little
D790830 July 2017 McCourt
D792694 July 2017 Cin
D793689 August 2017 McCourt
D793702 August 2017 Parker
D802284 November 2017 McCullagh
D802287 November 2017 Gibson
D805286 December 2017 Martin
9907358 March 2018 Ariola
D814168 April 2018 Stauffer
D817620 May 2018 Weddle
D822973 July 2018 Nickless
D824651 August 2018 Greenhalgh
D824652 August 2018 Benzien
D828001 September 2018 Sokol
Primary Examiner: Oswecki; Elizabeth J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a top front perspective view of a shoe showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a front view thereof; and,

FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof.

The different stippling patterns represent a contrast in appearance of material. The surface areas showing the stippling pattern form a part of the claimed design.

The dashed broken lines in the figures show portions of the shoe that form no part of the claimed design.

The dot-dash broken lines in the figures show boundaries that form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *

Patent Diagrams and Documents

D00000


D00001


D00002


D00003


D00004


D00005


XML


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed