Display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management
Lirov , et al.
U.S. patent number D847,170 [Application Number D/600,900] was granted by the patent office on 2019-04-30 for display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management. The grantee listed for this patent is Vericle Corporation. Invention is credited to Erez Lirov, Yuval Lirov.
| United States Patent | D847,170 |
| Lirov , et al. | April 30, 2019 |
Display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lirov; Yuval (Clearwater Beach, FL), Lirov; Erez (Morganville, NJ) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/600,900 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | April 17, 2017 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29524080 | Apr 16, 2015 | ||||
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/486 |
| Current International Class: | 1404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/485-495 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D504440 | April 2005 | Luquet |
| D530335 | October 2006 | Blencowe |
| D553628 | October 2007 | Blencowe |
| D553631 | October 2007 | Blencowe |
| D593579 | June 2009 | Thomas |
| D617335 | June 2010 | Ehrler |
| D637603 | May 2011 | Godgart |
| D656946 | April 2012 | Judy et al. |
| D665816 | August 2012 | Kobayashi |
| D670719 | November 2012 | Kobayashi |
| D673967 | January 2013 | Pearcy et al. |
| D674403 | January 2013 | Pearcy et al. |
| D674404 | January 2013 | Pearcy et al. |
| D675633 | February 2013 | Goldstein et al. |
| D675634 | February 2013 | Goldstein et al. |
| D675635 | February 2013 | Goldstein et al. |
| D675636 | February 2013 | Goldstein et al. |
| D681651 | May 2013 | Fletcher et al. |
| D766955 | September 2016 | Hemsley |
| D774058 | December 2016 | Dias |
| D795902 | August 2017 | Ahmad |
| D797770 | September 2017 | Noack |
| D798890 | October 2017 | Nazarof |
| D799527 | October 2017 | Rasheed |
| 2015/0106723 | April 2015 | Bertelsen |
| 2016/0092474 | March 2016 | Stojanovic et al. |
Other References
|
"Webinar: Introduction To ProWorkflow" Dec. 27, 2013, YouTube, site visited Aug. 6, 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxYCvnV7azl. cited by examiner . "WorkflowFirst: Free Workflow Approval Database" Jul. 6, 2015, YouTube, site visited Aug. 6, 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylSjND712E8. cited by examiner. |
Primary Examiner: Reickel; Jack
Attorney, Agent or Firm: The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC Gross; Roy
Description
The FIGURE is a front view of display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management.
The outermost broken line rectangle showing of the display screen and all other broken lines showing portions of the display screen with graphical user interface for practice workflow management are included for the purpose of illustrating portions of the article and form no part of the claimed design.
The design is directed towards a physical article as shown and described.
* * * * *
References
D00000
D00001
XML
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 