Laser tracker device

Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a front view of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a rear view of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a first side view of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a second side view of the invention;

FIG. 6 is a top view of the invention;

FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the invention; and,

FIG. 8 is a bottom perspective view of the invention.

The broken lines and unshaded portioned contained within the broken lines shown in FIG. 1-FIG. 8 are not part of the claimed design.

References to "side", "top", "front", "rear" and "bottom" in the figure descriptions are not meant to require certain in-use orientation; a laser tracker device according to the claimed design may be used in any orientation.

Claims

CLAIM We claim, the ornamental design for a laser tracker device, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	O'Neill; Daniel J. (Willow Grove, PA), Murray; Thomas William (Philadelphia, PA), Murray; Christopher John (Philadelphia, PA), Albert; Jonathan D. (Philadelphia, PA), Coleman; John D. (Philadelphia, PA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type FARO Technologies, Inc. Lake Mary FL US
Assignee:	FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Lake Mary, FL)
Appl. No.:	D/579,487
Filed:	September 30, 2016

---

Current U.S. Class:	D10/66
Current International Class:	1004
Field of Search:	;D10/66,70

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D317132	May 1991	Knipfer
D688577	August 2013	Steffey et al.
D705678	May 2014	Steffey et al.
D723398	March 2015	Ishii
D769744	October 2016	Kelley
9482525	November 2016	Bridges
9523574	December 2016	Chiba

Primary Examiner: Davis; Antoine Duval
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cantor Colburn LLP