Display screen with graphical user interface
Phillips , et al. August 14, 2
U.S. patent number D825,582 [Application Number D/582,701] was granted by the patent office on 2018-08-14 for display screen with graphical user interface. This patent grant is currently assigned to SPOTIFY AB. The grantee listed for this patent is SPOTIFY AB. Invention is credited to Joe Phillips, Ivo Silva, Stanley Wood.
| United States Patent | D825,582 |
| Phillips , et al. | August 14, 2018 |
Display screen with graphical user interface
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a display screen with a graphical user interface, as shown.
| Inventors: | Phillips; Joe (Stockholm, SE), Silva; Ivo (Stockholm, SE), Wood; Stanley (Stockholm, SE) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | SPOTIFY AB (Stockholm,
SE) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/582,701 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | October 28, 2016 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/485 |
| Current International Class: | 1404 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/485-495 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D680125 | April 2013 | Chaudhri |
| D704206 | May 2014 | Jung |
| D726759 | April 2015 | Brinda |
| D730383 | May 2015 | Brinda |
| D730926 | June 2015 | Lee |
| D732065 | June 2015 | Roberts |
| D732570 | June 2015 | Choi |
| D747341 | January 2016 | Zhang |
| D747343 | January 2016 | Brinda |
| D753135 | April 2016 | Vazquez |
| D753136 | April 2016 | Vazquez |
| D754675 | April 2016 | Vazquez |
| D757058 | May 2016 | Kai |
| D759694 | June 2016 | Lim |
| D762678 | August 2016 | Oh |
| D766270 | September 2016 | Gandhi |
| D770495 | November 2016 | Knapp |
| D775167 | December 2016 | Vazquez |
| D777172 | January 2017 | Solop |
| D777185 | January 2017 | Kwak |
| D777196 | January 2017 | Peng |
| D777747 | January 2017 | Derby |
| D780189 | February 2017 | Yang |
| D780212 | February 2017 | Bae |
| D780798 | March 2017 | Yang |
| D781311 | March 2017 | Rad |
| D781874 | March 2017 | Dunn |
| D785003 | April 2017 | Yun |
| D786911 | May 2017 | Cheon |
| D788159 | May 2017 | Li |
| D794039 | August 2017 | Yeung |
| D794047 | August 2017 | Gandhi |
| D795279 | August 2017 | Van Every |
| D795287 | August 2017 | Sun |
| D795903 | August 2017 | Chen |
| D795904 | August 2017 | Pei |
| D797769 | September 2017 | Li |
| D801347 | October 2017 | Zhu |
| D804498 | December 2017 | Akatsu |
| D806101 | December 2017 | Frick |
| D806102 | December 2017 | Baek |
| D806735 | January 2018 | Olsen |
| D807904 | January 2018 | Howard |
| D807919 | January 2018 | Cohen |
| D815128 | April 2018 | Phillips |
| D815129 | April 2018 | Phillips |
| D815130 | April 2018 | Phillips |
| D819073 | May 2018 | Wettstein |
Assistant Examiner: Domino; Daniel J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Tucker Ellis LLP
Description
The FIGURE is a front view of a display screen with graphical user interface showing the design.
The dot-dash broken lines showing an electronic device illustrate environmental subject matter. The even broken lines showing a display screen and elements of the graphical user interface illustrate portions of the article. None of the aforementioned subject matters that are depicted in the broken line variations form part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 