U.S. patent number D811,067 [Application Number D/582,677] was granted by the patent office on 2018-02-27 for shoe outsole. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Darryl Matthews.
United States Patent | D811,067 |
Matthews | February 27, 2018 |
Inventors: | Matthews; Darryl (Portland, OR) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
||||||||||
Appl. No.: | D/582,677 | ||||||||||
Filed: | October 28, 2016 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/960; D2/957; D2/951 |
Current International Class: | 0204 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/902,906,908,916,918,925,946-962,977 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,28,32R,34R,59C,67A,103 |
2266476 | December 1941 | Riess |
D460249 | July 2002 | Yang |
D504756 | May 2005 | Adams |
D518279 | April 2006 | Schoenborn |
D595044 | June 2009 | Chang |
D621594 | August 2010 | Diaz |
D634525 | March 2011 | Bizzo |
D635755 | April 2011 | McMillan |
D636157 | April 2011 | Nascimento |
D654677 | February 2012 | McClaskie |
D659363 | May 2012 | Leary |
D686402 | July 2013 | Portzline |
D686404 | July 2013 | McCourt |
D694502 | December 2013 | Rasmussen |
D710080 | August 2014 | Faux |
D752325 | March 2016 | Spieth |
D778566 | February 2017 | Chang |
D803533 | November 2017 | Dhadwal |
2002/0062578 | May 2002 | Lussier |
2013/0185955 | July 2013 | Cheng |
2015/0272271 | October 2015 | Campos, II |
2017/0042285 | February 2017 | Lawless |
2017/0303633 | October 2017 | Hopkins |
Nike HTM2 Run Boot Low + High--Preview [online], [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], Retrieved from Internet <URL: http://sneakernews.com/2010/02/19/nike-htm2-running-boot-low-high-preview- //>; 8 color sheets, Dated Feb. 19, 2010. cited by applicant . Nike Air Foamposite Pro "Elephant Print" Release Date [online], [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], Retrieved from Internet <URL: http://sneakerbardetroit.com/nike-air-foamposite-pro-elephant-print-relea- se-date/>; 9 color sheets, Dated Sep. 26, 2014. cited by applicant . Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 33, [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], 1 color sheet, Date unknown but at least as early as Oct. 28, 2016. cited by applicant . Air Jordan XI Legend Blue [online], [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], Retrieved from Internet <URL: https://www.nike.com/launch/t/air-jordan-11-retro-legend-blue>; 12 color sheets, Date unknown but at least as early as Oct. 28, 2016. cited by applicant . Air Jordan XX8 "Color Pack"--Official Images [online], [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], Retrieved from Internet <URL: http://sneakernews.com/2013/02/28/air-jordan-xx8-color-pack-official-imag- es/>; 13 color sheets, Dated Feb. 28, 2013. cited by applicant . Shoe Stream--Air Max 90 Seattle [online], [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], Retrieved from Internet <URL: http://news.nike.com/footwear/nike-wmns-air-max-1-premium-id>; 5 color sheets, Date unknown but at least as early as Oct. 28, 2016. cited by applicant . Nike Air Zoom Legend Low, [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], 1 color sheet, Date unknown but at least as early as Oct. 28, 2017. cited by applicant . Nike Air Presto, [retrieved Feb. 21, 2017], 1 color sheet, Date unknown but at least as early as Oct. 28, 2017. cited by applicant. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.