Shirt

Description

FIG. 1 is a front, left perspective view of a shirt showing a first embodiment according to the present design;

FIG. 2 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a top-down view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a bottom-up view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a front view of the shirt showing a second embodiment according to the present design;

FIG. 8 is a rear view thereof;

FIG. 9 is a left side view thereof;

FIG. 10 is a top-down view thereof; and,

FIG. 11 is a bottom-up view thereof.

The evenly spaced broken lines shown in the drawings are directed to environment, are for informational purposes only, and form no part of the claimed design.

The long and short broken lines are boundary lines, which define the bounds of the claimed design. These boundaries do not exist in reality in the article embodying the design. It is understood that the claimed design extends to these boundaries but does not include the boundaries.

The surface shading on the claimed portion is provided only to indicate the character and/or any contour or curvature of the surfaces. They do not indicate color, texture, markings that actually exist thereon, indicia, graphic representations, surface treatment, or any other ornamentation applied to the article.

The small circles within the claimed area are perforations. The small circles outside of the claimed area are perforations shown for environmental purposes only.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a shirt, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Harris; Donavan (Portland, OR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type NIKE, Inc. Beaverton OR US
Assignee:	NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton, OR)
Appl. No.:	D/546,198
Filed:	November 19, 2015

---

Current U.S. Class:	D2/840
Current International Class:	0202
Field of Search:	;D2/840,850,828,846,717,739,731,749-751 ;D5/1,55,57 ;2/90,115,125,128

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

1158938	November 1915	Kronthal
1202332	October 1916	Tschirgi
1208193	December 1916	Nightingale
2126186	August 1938	Friedland
2341797	February 1944	Lesser
4208742	June 1980	Maos
4635301	January 1987	Sulser
5083315	January 1992	Dillon, Jr.
5349704	September 1994	Masters
5487189	January 1996	Bell
D457709	May 2002	Davis
D515824	February 2006	Leisch
D526763	August 2006	Tanner
D529295	October 2006	Kressner
D612130	March 2010	Hall
D696488	December 2013	Kenney
D737543	September 2015	Turner
D745250	December 2015	McClain
D760479	July 2016	Adrovic
D763582	August 2016	McClain
D770141	November 2016	Woosey
D779163	February 2017	Adrovic
D784706	April 2017	McClain
2007/0294801	December 2007	Furgerson et al.
2008/0078009	April 2008	Black et al.
2010/0186138	July 2010	Hale
2012/0324618	December 2012	Dieffenbacher
2015/0040286	February 2015	Schultz et al.

Foreign Patent Documents

	0893072		Jan 1999		EP
	1281848		Jul 1972		GB

Other References

"Dress Shirts Split Yoke vs One Piece Yoke," Proper Cloth, propercloth.com, 2015. Available at: http://propercloth.com/reference/dress-shirts-split-yoke-vs-one-piece-yok- e/. cited by applicant . Jess, "Reebok clothing review & giveaway," Blonde Ponytail, May 23, 2013. Available at: http://blondeponytail.com/2013/05/reebok-clothing-review-giveaway/. cited by applicant . Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/530,055, filed Jun. 12, 2015. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Hattan; Susan Bennett
Assistant Examiner: Tsehaye; Rebecca
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shook, Hardy and Bacon L.L.P.