Camera
Schulze February 20, 2
U.S. patent number D810,802 [Application Number D/575,479] was granted by the patent office on 2018-02-20 for camera. This patent grant is currently assigned to VITRONIC Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH. The grantee listed for this patent is VITRONIC Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH. Invention is credited to Andreas Schulze.
| United States Patent | D810,802 |
| Schulze | February 20, 2018 |
Camera
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a camera, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Schulze; Andreas (Hunfelden, DE) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | VITRONIC Dr.-Ing. Stein
Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH (Wiesbaden, DE) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/575,479 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | August 25, 2016 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Feb 25, 2016 [EM] | 003001460-0001 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D16/202 |
| Current International Class: | 1601 |
| Field of Search: | ;D16/200-220,229,230,242,244,245,238,225 ;D14/496,203.1,203.3,203.7,240,356,358 ;D28/41 ;D1/109,107,106 ;D2/868,869,883,884,894,895,873 ;D29/122 ;D12/400 ;D11/158,224,181,239,31,49,82,100,128,157 ;D21/617,618,611,620,652,654,656,655 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D234317 | February 1975 | Woods |
| D241656 | September 1976 | Genaro et al. |
| D355205 | February 1995 | Yokoi |
| 5828986 | October 1998 | Horigome |
| D416930 | November 1999 | Choi |
| D433046 | October 2000 | Hall |
| D483386 | December 2003 | Narducci |
| D629031 | December 2010 | Su |
| D654942 | February 2012 | Khamsepoor |
| D664579 | July 2012 | Tzeng |
| D678380 | March 2013 | Pardo |
| D680146 | April 2013 | Tsai |
| D694796 | December 2013 | Tsai |
| D710361 | August 2014 | Park |
| D725171 | March 2015 | Mita |
| D747386 | January 2016 | Li |
| D760311 | June 2016 | Cho |
| D783075 | April 2017 | Maxwell |
Other References
|
Vicam 3S, announced 2017 [online], [site visited Aug. 17, 2017], Available from Internet URL: <http://www.wetzlar-network.de/Magazin/Trends/Smart-Case-Studies-a675.- html>. cited by examiner . VICAM3S, announced Jun. 29, 2017 [online], [site visited Aug. 17, 2017], Available from Internet URL:<https://twitter.com/as.sub.--schulze>. cited by examiner . Vitronic Vicam 3s, announced May 18, 2016, [online], [site visited Aug. 17, 2017], Available from Internet URL: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1w9bTXSJng> at approximately 0:27. cited by examiner . Vitronic, announced Jun. 8, 2016 [online], [site visited Aug. 17, 2017], Available from Internet URL: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBCcGJXOEwU> at approximately 1:04. cited by examiner. |
Primary Examiner: Fox; Barbara
Assistant Examiner: Ramirez; Mary C
Attorney, Agent or Firm: The Webb Law Firm
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a camera showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front, right perspective view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear, right perspective view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a front, left, bottom perspective view thereof.
The broken lines shown in the drawings depict portions of the camera that do not form part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 