Inhaler
Bhide , et al. June 13, 2
U.S. patent number D789,517 [Application Number D/496,009] was granted by the patent office on 2017-06-13 for inhaler. This patent grant is currently assigned to LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA. The grantee listed for this patent is Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA. Invention is credited to Raghuram Amperayani Pattabhi, Vishwajit Bhide, Bishu Choubey, Rohini Pimple.
| United States Patent | D789,517 |
| Bhide , et al. | June 13, 2017 |
Inhaler
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an inhaler, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Bhide; Vishwajit (Mumbai, IN), Amperayani Pattabhi; Raghuram (Baltimore, MD), Pimple; Rohini (Pune, IN), Choubey; Bishu (Pune, IN) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA
(Zug, CH) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/496,009 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | July 8, 2014 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jan 28, 2014 [IN] | 259767 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/110 |
| Current International Class: | 2902 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/107,108,110,111,127,164 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D355029 | January 1995 | Kinneir |
| 7084153 | August 2006 | Banholzer |
| 7244742 | July 2007 | Pieper |
| 7332175 | February 2008 | Konetzki |
| 7417051 | August 2008 | Banholzer |
| D614024 | April 2010 | Eason |
| 7763280 | July 2010 | Hartig |
| D623054 | September 2010 | Eason |
| D645734 | September 2011 | Eason |
| D646965 | October 2011 | Eason |
| 8397717 | March 2013 | Geser |
| D683844 | June 2013 | Andrade |
| D710002 | July 2014 | Valentine |
| D733288 | June 2015 | Althorpe |
| D739522 | September 2015 | Von Schuckmann |
| D744087 | November 2015 | Bilgic |
| 2002/0183347 | December 2002 | Meade |
| 2002/0189610 | December 2002 | Bozung |
| 2003/0235538 | December 2003 | Zierenberg |
| 2004/0048887 | March 2004 | Meade |
| 2004/0058950 | March 2004 | Meade |
| 2004/0266869 | December 2004 | Montague |
| 2005/0279357 | December 2005 | Wachtel |
| 2006/0219242 | October 2006 | Zierenberg |
| 2006/0237016 | October 2006 | Wachtel |
| 2006/0239935 | October 2006 | Bouyssou |
| 2007/0107722 | May 2007 | Hoelz |
| 2008/0135047 | June 2008 | Johnson |
| 2008/0295832 | December 2008 | Geser |
| 2009/0165791 | July 2009 | Wendland |
| 2009/0235929 | September 2009 | Egen |
| 2010/0099651 | April 2010 | Jung |
| 2010/0275917 | November 2010 | Kuhn |
| 2011/0067696 | March 2011 | Sato |
| 2011/0203586 | August 2011 | Egen |
| 2011/0232637 | September 2011 | Kaemper |
| 2013/0152927 | June 2013 | Baillet |
| 2013/0186398 | July 2013 | Baillet |
| 2013/0255679 | October 2013 | Andrade |
| 2013/0269695 | October 2013 | Brouet |
| 2014/0318538 | October 2014 | Bilgic |
Assistant Examiner: Bekic; Lilyana
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Merchant & Gould P.C.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front, top, left side perspective view of an inhaler in accordance with the new design;
FIG. 2 is a front, top, right side perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear, top, right side perspective view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 