Intranasal catheter
Eldredge January 10, 2
U.S. patent number D776,259 [Application Number D/487,825] was granted by the patent office on 2017-01-10 for intranasal catheter. This patent grant is currently assigned to Dolor Technologies, LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is DOLOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. Invention is credited to Stephen Eldredge.
| United States Patent | D776,259 |
| Eldredge | January 10, 2017 |
Intranasal catheter
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an intranasal catheter, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Eldredge; Stephen (South Jordan, UT) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Dolor Technologies, LLC (Salt
Lake City, UT) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/487,825 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | April 11, 2014 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/112 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/112-114,133,186,130,127 ;606/181,185 ;604/264,272,115,164.01-164.09,533,232,187,168.01,192,19,48,93.01,523,524,526 ;600/101,139,143 ;128/200.24,207.14,207.15 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3545080 | December 1970 | William |
| 5067912 | November 1991 | Bickford |
| 5437637 | August 1995 | Lieber |
| D373827 | September 1996 | Polaniec |
| D417733 | December 1999 | Howell |
| 6007522 | December 1999 | Agro |
| D612044 | March 2010 | Scheibe |
| D627460 | November 2010 | Horton |
| D630733 | January 2011 | Ahlgren |
| D654583 | February 2012 | Lee-Sepsick |
| 8187231 | May 2012 | Bellisario |
| D700318 | February 2014 | Amoah |
| D715431 | October 2014 | Vonck |
| D724200 | March 2015 | Brannon |
| D735321 | July 2015 | Blanchard |
| 2005/0072430 | April 2005 | Djupesland |
| 2005/0148950 | July 2005 | Windheuser |
| 2006/0015075 | January 2006 | Blanco |
| 2006/0195169 | August 2006 | Gross et al. |
| 2007/0255092 | November 2007 | Ainley |
| 2008/0172033 | July 2008 | Keith et al. |
| 2009/0062743 | March 2009 | Rotella |
| 2009/0131867 | May 2009 | Liu et al. |
| 2010/0030187 | February 2010 | Xia |
| 2010/0191267 | July 2010 | Fox |
| 2010/0324506 | December 2010 | Pellegrino |
| 2011/0152838 | June 2011 | Xia |
| 2012/0238968 | September 2012 | Toy |
| 2014/0276661 | September 2014 | Hannon |
| 2015/0038908 | February 2015 | Antonucci |
| 2015/0088100 | March 2015 | Oborn |
| 2015/0290439 | October 2015 | Eldredge |
Other References
|
SpenoCath website, Sphenocath product, Oct. 26, 2013, http://www.sphenocath.com/why-sphenocath/. cited by examiner. |
Primary Examiner: Muller; David
Assistant Examiner: Johnston; Nathan
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an intranasal catheter according to my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 7 is an opposite side elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the catheter in an extended position.
The broken line showing of the intranasal catheter is included for the purpose of illustrating portions of the "article" and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 