Earphone
Nakajima January 3, 2
U.S. patent number D775,610 [Application Number D/546,690] was granted by the patent office on 2017-01-03 for earphone. This patent grant is currently assigned to Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.. Invention is credited to Masayuki Nakajima.
| United States Patent | D775,610 |
| Nakajima | January 3, 2017 |
Earphone
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an earphone, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Nakajima; Masayuki (Osaka, JP) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Panasonic Intellectual Property
Management Co., Ltd. (Osaka, JP) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/546,690 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | November 24, 2015 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jul 17, 2015 [JP] | 2015-015994 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/223 |
| Current International Class: | 1401 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/223 ;D24/174 ;128/864-867 ;181/129,130,135 ;381/328,330,72,380,381,374,370 ;379/430,431 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2641327 | June 1953 | Balmer |
| 5412736 | May 1995 | Keliiliki |
| D375959 | November 1996 | Davis |
| 5625171 | April 1997 | Marshall |
| 6233344 | May 2001 | Clegg |
| D447743 | September 2001 | Ma |
| 6396935 | May 2002 | Makkonen |
| D460436 | July 2002 | Bjorklund |
| D469422 | January 2003 | Nguyen |
| D470129 | February 2003 | Hlas |
| D474178 | May 2003 | Eroma |
| D498227 | November 2004 | Dyer |
| D501196 | January 2005 | Dyer |
| D504672 | May 2005 | Hirano |
| D510085 | September 2005 | Suzuki |
| D510575 | October 2005 | Leong |
| D515069 | February 2006 | Naito |
| D518816 | April 2006 | Naito |
| D542267 | May 2007 | Cha |
| D543968 | June 2007 | Wong |
| D593075 | May 2009 | Williams |
| D597084 | July 2009 | Gondo |
| D603847 | November 2009 | Chung |
| 7648005 | January 2010 | Leong |
| 7708110 | May 2010 | Leong |
| D617778 | June 2010 | Birger |
| D625297 | October 2010 | Tseng |
| D629397 | December 2010 | Hensen |
| D631470 | January 2011 | Yoneyama |
| D635960 | April 2011 | Gondo |
| D639787 | June 2011 | Quek |
| 8265328 | September 2012 | Milde |
| D685768 | July 2013 | Mogili |
| D695275 | December 2013 | Chee |
| 8655005 | February 2014 | Birger |
| D710333 | August 2014 | Davies |
| D712382 | September 2014 | Brunner |
| D713385 | September 2014 | Burgett |
| D718283 | November 2014 | Thompson |
| D725637 | March 2015 | Nakajima |
| D761770 | July 2016 | Kanou |
| 2003/0044038 | March 2003 | Shirata |
| 2009/0285434 | November 2009 | Williams |
| D1502701 | Jul 2014 | JP | |||
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Panasonic IP Management Culpepper; Kerry S.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of an earphone of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a right side view thereof;
FIG. 7 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 8 is a bottom view thereof.
The broken line showing of earphone is included for the purpose of illustrating environment and forms no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 