Electronic vaporization device
Lomeli July 19, 2
U.S. patent number D762,003 [Application Number D/497,578] was granted by the patent office on 2016-07-19 for electronic vaporization device. This patent grant is currently assigned to PAX Labs, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is PAX Labs, Inc.. Invention is credited to Kevin Lomeli.
| United States Patent | D762,003 |
| Lomeli | July 19, 2016 |
Electronic vaporization device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an electronic vaporization device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Lomeli; Kevin (San Francisco, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | PAX Labs, Inc. (San Francisco,
CA) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/497,578 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | July 25, 2014 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D27/163 |
| Current International Class: | 2702 |
| Field of Search: | ;D27/101,148,162-165,167,171-173,182-189,192-194,176-181,191,169,123,105,108,190 ;D8/300,349-352,354-356 ;D13/108,120,121,103.104 ;D25/126 ;D23/355,356,360,370 ;D24/110 ;D9/516,521,522,529,549,551,559,561,564,572-575,651,682,686-694,724,738,747 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D301837 | June 1989 | Peterson |
| D302659 | August 1989 | Peterson |
| D310171 | August 1990 | Cusenza |
| D367605 | March 1996 | Moore |
| D379810 | June 1997 | Giordano, Jr. |
| D540687 | April 2007 | Egawa |
| D558060 | December 2007 | {hacek over (S)}ir |
| D562151 | February 2008 | Larocca |
| D569727 | May 2008 | Moretti |
| D571556 | June 2008 | Raile |
| D573474 | July 2008 | Beam |
| D577591 | September 2008 | Bouroullec |
| D599670 | September 2009 | Qin |
| D616753 | June 2010 | Beam |
| D670272 | November 2012 | Suzuki |
| D682698 | May 2013 | Young |
| D684683 | June 2013 | Curti |
| D721972 | February 2015 | Brewer |
| D725310 | March 2015 | Eksouzian |
| D738038 | September 2015 | Smith |
| D739973 | September 2015 | Chao |
| 2013/0042865 | February 2013 | Monsees |
| 2015/0305409 | October 2015 | Verleur |
Other References
|
Electronic Vaporization Device | Pax Vaporizer | Vape World,posted at www.vapeworld.com, posting date not given, @ 2014 vapeworld.com [online] [site visited Nov. 13, 2015]. Availabe from internet, http://www.vapeworld.com/pax-vaporizer-by-ploom?gclid=CPCi1PKojskCFU06gQo- dPr. cited by examiner . Electronic Vaporization Device | Pax Vaporizer | Fuck Combustion | posted at, www.fuckcombustion.com, posting date not given, @ 2010-2015 fuckcombustion.com [online] [site visited Nov. 16, 2015]. Available from internet, http://fuckcombustion.com/threads/pax-vaporizer-by-ploom.6223/. cited by examiner. |
Primary Examiner: Hattan; Susan Bennett
Assistant Examiner: Wright; Jennifer
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Shay Glenn LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an electronic vaporization device, showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a right side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a left side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a rear elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The broken lines in the drawings depict parts of the electronic vaporization device that form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 