Orbital injection cannula

Description

FIG. 1 is a first perspective view of an orbital injection cannula in accordance with a first embodiment of the new design;

FIG. 2 is a second perspective view of the orbital injection cannula of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a third perspective view of the orbital injection cannula of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a left side elevation view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a right side elevation view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a front elevation view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a rear elevation view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 9 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 10 is a first perspective view of an orbital injection cannula in accordance with a second embodiment of the new design;

FIG. 11 is a second perspective view of the orbital injection cannula of FIG. 10;

FIG. 12 is a third perspective view of the orbital injection cannula of FIG. 10;

FIG. 13 is a left side elevation view thereof;

FIG. 14 is a right side elevation view thereof;

FIG. 15 is a front elevation view thereof;

FIG. 16 is a rear elevation view thereof;

FIG. 17 is a top plan view thereof; and,

FIG. 18 is a bottom plan view thereof.

FIGS. 1-9 show a right orbital injection cannula. A left orbital injection cannula is shown in FIGS. 10-18, and is a mirror image of the right orbital injection cannula. The broken lines in the drawing figures illustrate portions of the orbital injection cannula which form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an orbital injection cannula, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Fox; Donald (New York, NY)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Fox; Donald New York NY US
Appl. No.:	D/494,961
Filed:	June 25, 2014

---

Current U.S. Class:	D24/112
Current International Class:	2402
Field of Search:	;D24/112-114,108,130,127,133,186 ;606/181,185 ;604/264,523-528,272,164.01-164.11,187,93.01 ;600/101,139,143 ;128/200.24,207.14,207.15

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

4265231	May 1981	Scheller, Jr. et al.
D345417	March 1994	Sharipov
6135984	October 2000	Dishler
D450382	November 2001	Nestenborg
6413245	July 2002	Yaacobi et al.
D543626	May 2007	Watschke et al.
7357773	April 2008	Watschke
7547323	June 2009	Lavigne
D616087	May 2010	Brigatti et al.
D616088	May 2010	Brigatti et al.
D616540	May 2010	Brigatti et al.
D617448	June 2010	Singh
D642680	August 2011	Brucker
8096972	January 2012	Varner et al.
D670381	November 2012	Dapri
D674082	January 2013	Efinger
8430804	April 2013	Brigatti et al.
D685466	July 2013	Moshinsky
D703813	April 2014	Bolia
D703814	April 2014	Bolia
D703815	April 2014	Bolia
D704335	May 2014	Bolia
D708741	July 2014	Harrison
2003/0212305	November 2003	Anderson et al.
2006/0223026	October 2006	Kuroiwa et al.
2008/0306468	December 2008	Tamai

Other References

Guttman, Cheryl. "Cannula Approach Using Posterior Delivery Brings Unparalleled Safety." Ophthalmology Times; Mar 1, 2003; 28, 5; ProQuest Central, p. 22. cited by applicant . Kumar et al. "Complications of Ophthalmic Regional Blocks: Their Treatment and Prevention," Ophthalmologica 2006; 220:73-82. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Muller; David
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kim Winston LLP