Communication device
Glezerman , et al. May 31, 2
U.S. patent number D757,683 [Application Number D/512,796] was granted by the patent office on 2016-05-31 for communication device. This patent grant is currently assigned to CARDO SYSTEMS, INC.. The grantee listed for this patent is CARDO SYSTEMS, INC.. Invention is credited to Uri Gilboa, Abraham Glezerman, Abraham Moato.
| United States Patent | D757,683 |
| Glezerman , et al. | May 31, 2016 |
Communication device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a communication device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Glezerman; Abraham (Tel Aviv, IL), Moato; Abraham (Rishon LeZion, IL), Gilboa; Uri (Givatayim, IL) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | CARDO SYSTEMS, INC.
(Pittsburgh, PA) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/512,796 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | December 23, 2014 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
| Jun 30, 2014 [IL] | 55766 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D14/206; D14/233 |
| Current International Class: | 1401 |
| Field of Search: | ;D14/205,206,223,142,192,225 ;379/430,431 ;381/374,375,370,371,380,381,327,330 ;455/90.3,575.2,568,569.1,556.1 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D196515 | October 1963 | Flygstad et al. |
| 3280273 | October 1966 | Flygstad |
| D220497 | April 1971 | Egli et al. |
| D266242 | September 1982 | Radzelovage |
| 4357711 | November 1982 | Drefko |
| D295403 | April 1988 | Oleson |
| D299335 | January 1989 | Wiegel |
| D306725 | March 1990 | Tanaka |
| D354568 | January 1995 | Araki |
| 5590209 | December 1996 | Pratt |
| 5721775 | February 1998 | Leifer |
| D391964 | March 1998 | Balzano |
| 6055312 | April 2000 | Pralus |
| D424568 | May 2000 | Gerdom |
| D425511 | May 2000 | Gerdom |
| 6075857 | June 2000 | Doss, Jr. |
| D443603 | June 2001 | Taylor |
| D445415 | July 2001 | Jaakkola |
| D445416 | July 2001 | Glezerman |
| D457513 | May 2002 | Pirelli |
| D460752 | July 2002 | Gerdom |
| D460960 | July 2002 | Kao |
| D471898 | March 2003 | Bae |
| 6754361 | June 2004 | Hall |
| 6760459 | July 2004 | Bae |
| 6768804 | July 2004 | Isvan |
| D504419 | April 2005 | Bey |
| 6929249 | August 2005 | Kim |
| 7003317 | February 2006 | Belcher |
| D517054 | March 2006 | Yang |
| D527376 | August 2006 | Swain |
| D538271 | March 2007 | Kim |
| D542267 | May 2007 | Cha |
| D552596 | October 2007 | Christopher |
| D555151 | November 2007 | Eklund |
| D603378 | November 2009 | Paradise |
| D604722 | November 2009 | Mistry |
| D618221 | June 2010 | Fahrendorff |
| D663715 | July 2012 | Glezerman |
| D696647 | December 2013 | Houghton |
| 8706043 | April 2014 | Glezerman |
| D713822 | September 2014 | Paradise |
| D736177 | August 2015 | Winters |
| 2004/0204208 | October 2004 | Thompson |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Chu; Andrew W. Craft Chu PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the communication device showing my design.
FIG. 2 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a top plan view thereof, including protrusion attachments in broken lines; and,
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view thereof.
The broken lines form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 