U.S. patent number D738,295 [Application Number D/460,784] was granted by the patent office on 2015-09-08 for automobile tire.
This patent grant is currently assigned to TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD.. The grantee listed for this patent is TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD.. Invention is credited to Toshihiko Kanamura.
United States Patent |
D738,295 |
Kanamura |
September 8, 2015 |
Automobile tire
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for an automobile tire, as shown and
described.
Inventors: |
Kanamura; Toshihiko (Osaka,
JP) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. |
Osaka-shi, Osaka |
N/A |
JP |
|
|
Assignee: |
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO.,
LTD. (Osaka-shi, JP)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/460,784 |
Filed: |
July 15, 2013 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2013 [JP] |
|
|
2013-013852 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
D12/585 |
Current International
Class: |
1215 |
Field of
Search: |
;D12/605,604
;152/209.1-209.28,455,523 ;40/587 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1320229 |
|
Jan 2008 |
|
JP |
|
D1381337 |
|
Mar 2010 |
|
JP |
|
1385011 |
|
Apr 2010 |
|
JP |
|
1434146 |
|
Feb 2012 |
|
JP |
|
1439192 |
|
Apr 2012 |
|
JP |
|
Other References
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013, issued in corresponding
Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-013852 with English
translation (6 pages). cited by applicant .
Japanese Office Action (Decision of Refusal) dated Mar. 4, 2014,
issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-013852
with English Translation. (4 pages). cited by applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Kirschbaum; George D
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Westerman, Hattori, Daniels &
Adrian, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front elevational view of an automobile tire, showing
my new design, the rear elevational view being identical
thereto;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof, the bottom plan view being
identical thereto;
FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof, the left side
elevational view being identical thereto;
FIG. 4 is a perspective view thereof;
FIG. 5 is an enlarged cross-sectional view taken along line 5-5 in
FIG. 1, in the area designated by 5'-5' in FIG. 3 thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is an enlarged cross-sectional view taken along line 6-6 and
line 6'-6' in FIG. 1.
In the drawings, the broken lines defining the sidewall, inner bead
and the peripheral boundary between the claimed tire tread and the
unclaimed sidewall depict environmental subject matter that forms
no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *