U.S. patent number D718,292 [Application Number D/433,446] was granted by the patent office on 2014-11-25 for case.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Incipio Technologies, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Incipio Technologies, Inc.. Invention is credited to Timothy Alan Hemesath, Derek Bryan Veldkamp.
United States Patent |
D718,292 |
Hemesath , et al. |
November 25, 2014 |
Case
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a case, as shown and described.
Inventors: |
Hemesath; Timothy Alan
(Huntington Beach, CA), Veldkamp; Derek Bryan (Huntington
Beach, CA) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Incipio Technologies, Inc. |
Irvine |
CA |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Incipio Technologies, Inc.
(Irvine, CA)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/433,446 |
Filed: |
September 28, 2012 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D14/250 |
Current International
Class: |
1403 |
Field of
Search: |
;D14/138G,138AD,138AB,138AA,203.8,203.5,250,251,252,253,217,496,440,346,248,238.1,137,356
;D3/218,215,201,247,269,273,301,303 ;220/4.02 ;361/679.56
;455/575.1,575.8 ;206/305,320,251,45.2 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Pratt; Deanna L
Assistant Examiner: Bekic; Lilyana
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a first embodiment of a
case.
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof.
FIG. 3 is a front view thereof.
FIG. 4 is a rear view thereof.
FIG. 5 is a left side view thereof.
FIG. 6 is a right side view thereof.
FIG. 7 is a top view thereof.
FIG. 8 is a bottom view thereof.
FIG. 9 is a rear perspective view of a second embodiment of a
case.
FIG. 10 is a rear view thereof.
FIG. 11 is a left side view thereof.
FIG. 12 is a right side view thereof; and,
FIG. 13 is a bottom view thereof.
The break lines indicate that the appearance of any portion of the
case between the break lines forms no part of the claimed design.
All other broken lines illustrate portions of the case which form
no part of the claimed design. Views of the second embodiment of
the case not shown are the same as the corresponding views of the
first embodiment of the case.
* * * * *