Shoe
Kelley November 25, 2
U.S. patent number D718,038 [Application Number D/493,154] was granted by the patent office on 2014-11-25 for shoe. This patent grant is currently assigned to Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. The grantee listed for this patent is Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II. Invention is credited to Scott Kelley.
| United States Patent | D718,038 |
| Kelley | November 25, 2014 |
Shoe
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for shoe, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Kelley; Scott (Torrance, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II
(Manhattan Beach, CA) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/493,154 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | June 5, 2014 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972; D2/946; D2/976 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/902,906-908,944,946,969,972-974,976 ;36/45,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D327769 | July 1992 | Serna et al. |
| D379029 | May 1997 | Ruiz |
| D391060 | February 1998 | Cass |
| D397855 | September 1998 | Clarke |
| D401049 | November 1998 | Greenberg |
| D401050 | November 1998 | Greenberg |
| D420504 | February 2000 | Avar |
| D440751 | April 2001 | McCullagh |
| D442360 | May 2001 | Holmes |
| D451270 | December 2001 | Hall |
| D483935 | December 2003 | Kuerbis |
| D501302 | February 2005 | Cessor |
| D510475 | October 2005 | Hlavacs |
| D516287 | March 2006 | Fontanarosa |
| D517289 | March 2006 | Dabah |
| D520729 | May 2006 | Hamel |
| D522227 | June 2006 | Young |
| D522727 | June 2006 | Chen |
| D522729 | June 2006 | Fogg |
| D522735 | June 2006 | Mermet |
| D527883 | September 2006 | Holmes |
| D528772 | September 2006 | Portzline |
| D537617 | March 2007 | Hlavacs |
| D546547 | July 2007 | Harlow |
| D595040 | June 2009 | Mochen |
| D614852 | May 2010 | Hatfield et al. |
| D615289 | May 2010 | Hatfield et al. |
| D634520 | March 2011 | Choi |
| D636584 | April 2011 | Williams, Jr. |
| D636585 | April 2011 | Williams, Jr. |
| D638621 | May 2011 | Mayden |
| D641965 | July 2011 | Choi |
| D642370 | August 2011 | Dolan |
| D642371 | August 2011 | Dolan |
| D645241 | September 2011 | McCullagh |
| D659988 | May 2012 | Kuerbis |
| D667621 | September 2012 | Portzline |
| D671733 | December 2012 | Petrie |
| D675006 | January 2013 | Thornhill |
| D675421 | February 2013 | Petrie |
| D676229 | February 2013 | Fogg et al. |
| D682529 | May 2013 | Johnsongriffin |
| D682533 | May 2013 | Little |
| D682534 | May 2013 | Little |
| D683133 | May 2013 | Petrie |
| D689685 | September 2013 | Chang |
| D690924 | October 2013 | Hardman |
| D690925 | October 2013 | Hardman |
| D693108 | November 2013 | Chung |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lerner; Marshall A. Kleinberg; Marvin H. Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe in accordance with my new design.
FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a right elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 4 is a left elevation view thereof.
Broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe in the figures are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed invention.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 