Semi trailer under-run protection device

Description

FIG. 1 is a first perspective view of a semi trailor under-run protection device showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is a second perspective view of a semi trailor under-run protection device showing our new design;

FIG. 3 is a front view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a rear view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a top view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a left side view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 8 is a right side view of the semi trailor under-run protection device of FIG. 1.

The broken lines depicted in the foregoing figures are for purposes of illustration only, and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for an semi trailor under-run protection device, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Deighton; Malcolm (Portland, OR)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Deighton; Malcolm Portland OR US
Assignee:	Sapa Extrustions, Inc. (Rosemont, IL)
Appl. No.:	D/416,584
Filed:	March 23, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D12/106
Current International Class:	1210
Field of Search:	;D12/100-106,19,129 ;D21/425,435 ;D34/21-26,12,16 ;280/204,205,63,475,482,647 ;296/168,180,180.2,10,61,100.01-100.08

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D208537	September 1967	Nyssen
D377700	January 1997	Butler
D475829	June 2003	DiStaulo
D488905	April 2004	DiStaulo
D503838	April 2005	Archambault
7533896	May 2009	Zhang et al.
D594386	June 2009	Jorgensen et al.
8075041	December 2011	Diniz

Primary Examiner: Betton; Katrina A
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Loeb & Loeb LLP