U.S. patent number D701,243 [Application Number D/408,515] was granted by the patent office on 2014-03-18 for pump actuator anti-rotation device.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Eaton Corporation. The grantee listed for this patent is John Page Chapman, Doug R. Cornett, Mark E. Jacobs, Gary Lynn Janowiak, Pratap S. Murthy, Daniel A. Nelson, Brent L. Rehm, James Roy Sheren, Anthony Leon Spoor. Invention is credited to John Page Chapman, Doug R. Cornett, Mark E. Jacobs, Gary Lynn Janowiak, Pratap S. Murthy, Daniel A. Nelson, Brent L. Rehm, James Roy Sheren, Anthony Leon Spoor.
United States Patent |
D701,243 |
Cornett , et al. |
March 18, 2014 |
Pump actuator anti-rotation device
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a pump actuator anti-rotation
device, as shown and described.
Inventors: |
Cornett; Doug R. (Hurdle Mills,
NC), Chapman; John Page (Richland, MI), Janowiak; Gary
Lynn (Saginaw, MI), Nelson; Daniel A. (Kalamazoo,
MI), Jacobs; Mark E. (Roxboro, NC), Rehm; Brent L.
(Nashville, MI), Murthy; Pratap S. (Ann Arbor, MI),
Spoor; Anthony Leon (Union City, MI), Sheren; James Roy
(Grand Ledge, MI) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Cornett; Doug R.
Chapman; John Page
Janowiak; Gary Lynn
Nelson; Daniel A.
Jacobs; Mark E.
Rehm; Brent L.
Murthy; Pratap S.
Spoor; Anthony Leon
Sheren; James Roy |
Hurdle Mills
Richland
Saginaw
Kalamazoo
Roxboro
Nashville
Ann Arbor
Union City
Grand Ledge |
NC
MI
MI
MI
NC
MI
MI
MI
MI |
US
US
US
US
US
US
US
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Eaton Corporation (Cleveland,
OH)
|
Appl.
No.: |
D/408,515 |
Filed: |
December 13, 2011 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
D15/7 |
Current International
Class: |
1502 |
Field of
Search: |
;D15/7-9
;D23/231,232,225
;417/60,235,265,321,355,358,363,359,410.1,415-416,405,900,43,554
;60/408,412 ;184/26-37 ;415/140-147 ;123/495,509
;166/105.1,105.2,311 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19600852 |
|
Jul 1997 |
|
DE |
|
102007016739 |
|
Oct 2008 |
|
DE |
|
Primary Examiner: Seifert; Ralf
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Remarck Law Group PLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a front view of a pump actuator anti-rotation device in
accordance with the present teachings.
FIG. 2 is a side view of the pump actuator anti-rotation device of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a back view of the pump actuator anti-rotation device of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a top view of the pump actuator anti-rotation device of
FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the pump actuator anti-rotation device
of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the pump actuator anti-rotation
device of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is another perspective view of the pump actuator
anti-rotation device of FIG. 1.
FIG. 8 is yet another perspective view of the pump actuator
anti-rotation device of FIG. 1.
FIG. 9 is an enlarged partial view of the pump actuator
anti-rotation device of FIG. 8; and,
FIG. 10 is partial exploded view of the pump actuator anti-rotation
device of FIG. 9.
The broken line showing portions of the pump actuator anti-rotation
device form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *