Shoe midsole with contrasting translucent regions

Miner December 31, 2

Patent Grant D696502

U.S. patent number D696,502 [Application Number D/465,832] was granted by the patent office on 2013-12-31 for shoe midsole with contrasting translucent regions. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Mark C. Miner.


United States Patent D696,502
Miner December 31, 2013

Shoe midsole with contrasting translucent regions

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe midsole with contrasting translucent regions, as shown and described.
Inventors: Miner; Mark C. (Portland, OR)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

NIKE, Inc.

Beaverton

OR

US
Assignee: NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton, OR)
Appl. No.: D/465,832
Filed: August 30, 2013

Current U.S. Class: D2/947; D2/957
Current International Class: 0204
Field of Search: ;D2/902,906,908,916,918,925,946-962,977 ;36/3B,22R,24.5,25R,28,32R,34R,59C,67A,103

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D299788 February 1989 Kelley
D326557 June 1992 Gardner
D398743 September 1998 Rask
D490232 May 2004 Kuerbis
D512557 December 2005 Lane et al.
D524034 July 2006 Hlavacs
D528776 September 2006 Hui
D541015 April 2007 Diaz
D547033 July 2007 Canavan
D547541 July 2007 Schindler et al.
D574602 August 2008 Grenet
D574604 August 2008 McMillan
D575944 September 2008 Pauk
D592383 May 2009 Wawrousek
D611689 March 2010 Stubblefield
D611690 March 2010 Stubblefield
D643599 August 2011 Fontanarosa
D650978 December 2011 Lee
D661878 June 2012 Grenet
D662301 June 2012 Raysse
D662697 July 2012 Portzline
D677451 March 2013 Amphyon
D682520 May 2013 Litchfield et al.
D685167 July 2013 Hatfield
2010/0170106 July 2010 Brewer et al.
2013/0232826 September 2013 Bier et al.

Other References

Nike Footwear Catalog, 1994 Holiday Footwear, p. 14, published Mar. 1994, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2001 Spring: Men's and Women's Footwear (white shoes), p. 28, published Jun. 2000, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2002 Holiday Jordan Footwear, p. 7, published Mar. 2002 , NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2005 Fall Footwear, p. 13, published Nov. 2004, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2005 Holiday Footwear, p. 219, published Mar. 2005, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2005 Holiday Footwear, p. 28, published Mar. 2005, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2005 Late Spring Footwear, p. 231, published Aug. 2004, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2006 Fall Footwear, p. 30, published Nov. 2005, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2010 Spring: Performance Footwear, p. 83, published May 2009, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2011 Holiday: Core Footwear, p. 57, published date unknown, but prior to the filing date of the present application, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2011 Holiday: Young Athletes Footwear, p. 9, published date unknown, but prior to the filing date of the present application, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Fall: Men's Footwear Sportswear Better, p. 5, published Nov. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Fall: Core Footwear, p. 58, published Nov. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Summer: Men's Performance Footwear, p. 18, published Aug. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Summer: Core Performance Footwear, p. 89, published Aug. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant .
Nike Footwear Catalog, 2012 Summer: Men's Performance Footwear, p. 34, published Aug. 2011, NIKE, Inc., USA. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Nelson; T. Chase
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.

Description



FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe midsole with contrasting translucent regions showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,

FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof.

The difference in greyscale shading between the front two claimed regions and the rear two claimed regions represents a contrast of color. The broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed