Support for a pronated foot

Description

FIG. 1 is a front side perspective view of a support for a pronated foot showing our new design;

FIG. 2 is another front side perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a top view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a front view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a first side view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a second side view thereof; and,

FIG. 7 is a bottom view thereof.

Dash-dot-dot-dash lines are used in the drawings to illustrate environment. The features illustrated in dash-dot-dot-dash lines form no part of the claimed design.

All surfaces not shown form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental design for a support for a pronated foot, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Faux; J. Robert (Provo, UT), Thorpe; Greg R. (Springville, UT)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Footmind, Inc. Alpine UT US
Assignee:	Footmind, Inc. (Alpine, UT)
Appl. No.:	D/435,607
Filed:	October 25, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D2/961
Current International Class:	0204
Field of Search:	;D2/896,946,947,950,961,968 ;36/83,88,89,91,92,93,12,14,25R,28,29,30R,30A,32R,43,44,69,71

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D432769	October 2000	Yung et al.
D474589	May 2003	Dykes
D496780	October 2004	Matuke
D517291	March 2006	Vasyli
D520221	May 2006	Bray et al.
D532586	November 2006	Birkenstock
D533336	December 2006	Walker
D545532	July 2007	Sawtelle et al.
D556990	December 2007	Cabados
D578284	October 2008	Elliott et al.
D582641	December 2008	Kielt et al.
D588348	March 2009	Elliott et al.
D611237	March 2010	Torrance et al.
D615742	May 2010	Vasyli
D618896	July 2010	Elliott et al.
D632468	February 2011	Meador et al.
D675004	January 2013	Singleton et al.
D681321	May 2013	Martinez et al.
2006/0026866	February 2006	Avent et al.
2007/0289163	December 2007	Weiss
2008/0271340	November 2008	Grisoni et al.

Primary Examiner: Oswecki; Elizabeth J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Durham Jones & Pinegar Intellectual Property Law Group