Case for mobile phone

Description

FIG. 1 is a front view of the case for mobile phone showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a left view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 3 is a right side view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 4 is a rear view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 6 is a top view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 7 is a front, left side, top perspective view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 8 is a front, right side, bottom perspective view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 9 is a front, left side, bottom perspective view of the case for mobile phone;

FIG. 10 is a front, right side, top perspective view of the case for mobile phone; and,

FIG. 11 is a rear, right side, top perspective view of the case for mobile phone.

The interior of the case for mobile phone, shown in FIGS. 1, and 7-10 as unshaded surfaces and broken lines on the unshaded surfaces, forms no part of the claimed design. The broken lines on the exterior of the case that are immediately adjacent the shaded surfaces represent boundaries of the claimed design. All other broken lines throughout the drawing figures depict unclaimed environment. The broken lines form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for a case for mobile phone, as shown and described.

---

Inventors:	Pan; Jason (Los Angeles, CA)
Applicant:	Name City State Country Type Superior Communications, Inc. Irwindale CA US
Assignee:	Superior Communications, Inc. (Irwindale, CA)
Appl. No.:	D/438,685
Filed:	November 30, 2012

---

Current U.S. Class:	D14/250
Current International Class:	1403
Field of Search:	;D14/250,440,238.1,251-253,203.3-203.7,217,496,248,240,447,341-347,444 ;D13/103,107-108,119 ;D3/201,218,247,269,273,301,303 ;248/309.1,371,176.3,668 ;361/679.56,679.3,679.25,816 ;379/426,433.11,455 ;455/575.1,575.8 ;206/305,320 ;320/108,115 ;429/96 ;220/4.02

---

References Cited [Referenced By]

---

U.S. Patent Documents

D37994	May 1906	Tower
D323503	January 1992	Yoneyama et al.
D348472	July 1994	Cyfko
D353783	December 1994	Burns
D357918	May 1995	Doria
D389158	January 1998	Oross
5896277	April 1999	Leon et al.
D412501	August 1999	Tyneski et al.
D459346	June 2002	Powell
D606305	December 2009	Lee et al.
D623651	September 2010	Hsu
D623652	September 2010	Hsu
D634313	March 2011	Fitzpatrick et al.
D638006	May 2011	Chang
D638007	May 2011	Chang
7938260	May 2011	Lin
D654341	February 2012	Hantke et al.
D656135	March 2012	Swartz et al.
D660305	May 2012	Ho et al.
D662925	July 2012	Mayberry et al.
D670279	November 2012	Veltz et al.
D673554	January 2013	Simmer
D675604	February 2013	Limber et al.
D675605	February 2013	Adelman et al.
D675606	February 2013	Adelman et al.

Other References

iLounge review of PureGear DualTek Extreme Shock Case + Shield for iPhone 5, published on Jan. 18, 2013, <URL:http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/puregear-dualtek-e- xtreme-shock-case-shield-for-iphone-5/>, retrieved from internet on May 5, 2013. cited by examiner . Review of Ballistic Smooth Series Case for iPhone 5, published on Oct. 17, 2012, <URL:http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/ballistic-sm- ooth-series-case-for-iphone-5/>, retrieved from internet on May 5, 2013. cited by examiner.

Primary Examiner: Wright; Carla Jobe
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Snell & Wilmer LLP