Ophthalmic structure
Christensen , et al. July 23, 2
U.S. patent number D686,729 [Application Number D/433,064] was granted by the patent office on 2013-07-23 for ophthalmic structure. This patent grant is currently assigned to Oasis Medical, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is OASIS Medical, Inc.. Invention is credited to James Marlow Christensen, D. Michael Colvard.
| United States Patent | D686,729 |
| Christensen , et al. | July 23, 2013 |
Ophthalmic structure
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a ophthalmic structure, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Christensen; James Marlow (Glendora, CA), Colvard; D. Michael (Encino, CA) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Oasis Medical, Inc. (Glendora,
CA) |
||||||||||
| Family ID: | 48086424 | ||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/433,064 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | September 25, 2012 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
| Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | Issue Date | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13275685 | Oct 18, 2011 | 8439833 | |||
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/150 |
| Current CPC Class: | A61B17/0231 20130101 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/150,172,140,135 ;606/107,4-6 ;604/294,302 ;600/201,206,210,233,236,237,238,239,242,243 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4321916 | March 1982 | McKee |
| 4991567 | February 1991 | McCuen, II et al. |
| 5163419 | November 1992 | Goldman |
| 5267553 | December 1993 | Graether |
| 5374272 | December 1994 | Arpa et al. |
| 5427088 | June 1995 | Graether |
| 5634884 | June 1997 | Graether |
| 5653753 | August 1997 | Brady et al. |
| D412576 | August 1999 | Austin et al. |
| 6332866 | December 2001 | Grieshaber et al. |
| D459804 | July 2002 | Koros et al. |
| D462442 | September 2002 | Webb |
| 6620098 | September 2003 | Milverton |
| D489130 | April 2004 | Sinding |
| D498531 | November 2004 | Sinding |
| D535024 | January 2007 | Huttner |
| D535395 | January 2007 | Huttner |
| D536094 | January 2007 | Huttner |
| D559388 | January 2008 | Melcher |
| D581531 | November 2008 | Alinsod et al. |
| D601698 | October 2009 | Stephenson et al. |
| D614303 | April 2010 | Gausmann et al. |
| D625005 | October 2010 | Zimmer et al. |
| D641471 | July 2011 | Zimmer et al. |
| 7985180 | July 2011 | Brown |
| D643118 | August 2011 | Zimmer et al. |
| 8029515 | October 2011 | Shiuey |
| D658286 | April 2012 | Ryshkus et al. |
| 2002/0055753 | May 2002 | Silvestrini |
| 2003/0092970 | May 2003 | Lee |
| 2008/0243139 | October 2008 | Dusek |
| 2008/0269888 | October 2008 | Malyugin |
| 9320127 | May 1994 | DE | |||
| 14505 | Aug 2000 | RU | |||
| 14506 | Aug 2000 | RU | |||
| 00/30566 | Jun 2000 | WO | |||
Other References
|
PCT/US12/60596 International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Dec. 20, 2012 from the International Search Authority/United States. cited by applicant. |
Primary Examiner: Simmons; Ian
Assistant Examiner: Fitts; Carissa C
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an ophthalmic structure showing our new design;
FIG. 2 is a top view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a side view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 