Unit dose applicator
Henrikson , et al. April 30, 2
U.S. patent number D681,196 [Application Number D/425,929] was granted by the patent office on 2013-04-30 for unit dose applicator. This patent grant is currently assigned to Team Technologies, Inc.. The grantee listed for this patent is Clark F. Bow, Steven R. Henrikson. Invention is credited to Clark F. Bow, Steven R. Henrikson.
| United States Patent | D681,196 |
| Henrikson , et al. | April 30, 2013 |
Unit dose applicator
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a unit dose applicator, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Henrikson; Steven R. (Morristown, TN), Bow; Clark F. (Dandridge, TN) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant: |
|
||||||||||
| Assignee: | Team Technologies, Inc.
(Morristown, TN) |
||||||||||
| Appl. No.: | D/425,929 | ||||||||||
| Filed: | June 28, 2012 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/115 |
| Current International Class: | 2402 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/117,115,223,226 ;22/209,207,215,541.6,541.4,541.9 ;D9/695-699,529 ;206/528 ;604/3,298 ;215/47,48 ;128/200.24 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 1321907 | November 1919 | Graham |
| 1681836 | August 1928 | Boka |
| 1725464 | August 1929 | Lysons |
| 1878027 | September 1932 | Tremolda |
| 2164895 | July 1939 | Botts |
| 2236030 | March 1941 | Hall |
| 2272641 | February 1942 | Mureau |
| 2422823 | June 1947 | Christensen |
| 3300808 | January 1967 | Karl |
| 3400997 | September 1968 | Schwartzman |
| 3592202 | July 1971 | Jones |
| 3698770 | October 1972 | Landen |
| D260406 | August 1981 | Itoh |
| D263074 | February 1982 | Mason |
| 4626120 | December 1986 | Fukui |
| 4795063 | January 1989 | Sekiguchi |
| 4844299 | July 1989 | Sekiguchi |
| 4867593 | September 1989 | Kurokawa |
| 4881289 | November 1989 | Tsuzoshi |
| 4907841 | March 1990 | Kay |
| 4908902 | March 1990 | McNab |
| 4913175 | April 1990 | Yokosuka |
| 4946302 | August 1990 | Uchida |
| 4968103 | November 1990 | McNab |
| 4974908 | December 1990 | Theodore |
| 5038974 | August 1991 | DaCosta |
| 5092702 | March 1992 | Kurokawa |
| D329253 | September 1992 | Sekiguchi |
| 5197496 | March 1993 | Nakamura |
| 5294207 | March 1994 | Keating |
| D351992 | November 1994 | Jacques |
| 5491865 | February 1996 | Gueret |
| D379663 | June 1997 | Pearson et al. |
| 5716104 | February 1998 | Keating |
| 5868287 | February 1999 | Kurokawa |
| D458676 | June 2002 | Berglund et al. |
| 6619387 | September 2003 | Jenkins et al. |
| D498666 | November 2004 | Mitchell |
| 6854914 | February 2005 | Keating |
| D517207 | March 2006 | Poynter |
| D548359 | August 2007 | Illein et al. |
| D602376 | October 2009 | Coulson |
| D618339 | June 2010 | Hansen |
| D627236 | November 2010 | Kozarsky |
| D672880 | December 2012 | Laverack et al. |
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Luedeka Neely Group, PC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a unit dose applicator of our new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a first side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a second side elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a front elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a rear elevation view thereof.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 