Air delivery device

Lithgow , et al. February 5, 2

Patent Grant D675730

U.S. patent number D675,730 [Application Number D/347,863] was granted by the patent office on 2013-02-05 for air delivery device. This patent grant is currently assigned to ResMed Limited. The grantee listed for this patent is Perry David Lithgow, Rohan Neil Primrose, Duncan Lovel Trevor-Wilson. Invention is credited to Perry David Lithgow, Rohan Neil Primrose, Duncan Lovel Trevor-Wilson.


United States Patent D675,730
Lithgow ,   et al. February 5, 2013

Air delivery device

Claims

CLAIM The ornamental appearance of an air delivery device, as shown and described.
Inventors: Lithgow; Perry David (Moruya, AU), Trevor-Wilson; Duncan Lovel (Frenches Forest, AU), Primrose; Rohan Neil (Marsfield, AU)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Lithgow; Perry David
Trevor-Wilson; Duncan Lovel
Primrose; Rohan Neil

Moruya
Frenches Forest
Marsfield

N/A
N/A
N/A

AU
AU
AU
Assignee: ResMed Limited (Bella Vista, AU)
Appl. No.: D/347,863
Filed: June 28, 2010

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
29290128 Oct 24, 2007 D621031
29274263 Apr 10, 2007 D557407
29207856 Jun 18, 2004 D544598

Current U.S. Class: D24/110
Current International Class: 2902
Field of Search: ;D24/110,164-165 ;D23/356,358,359,363 ;128/200.14,200.16,200.18,200.23,200.24,203.12,203.16,203.17,204.14,204.18,204.21,204.23

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
D421298 February 2000 Kenyon et al.
D427675 July 2000 Hansel
D467335 December 2002 Lithgow et al.
D468011 December 2002 Lithgow et al.
D476077 June 2003 Lithgow et al.
D477868 July 2003 Lithgow et al.
D487311 March 2004 Lithgow et al.
D493520 July 2004 Bertinetti et al.
D493884 August 2004 Virr et al.
D497203 October 2004 Lithgow et al.
D498527 November 2004 Virr et al.
D503796 April 2005 Lithgow et al.
D544598 June 2007 Lithgow et al.
D557407 December 2007 Lithgow et al.
D560795 January 2008 Lithgow et al.
D585540 January 2009 Lithgow et al.
8006691 August 2011 Kenyon et al.
8020551 September 2011 Virr et al.
8028693 October 2011 Trevor-Wilson et al.
8042535 October 2011 Kenyon et al.
D658755 May 2012 Lithgow
D659235 May 2012 Bertinetti et al.
2007/0193582 August 2007 Kwok et al.
2008/0072900 March 2008 Kenyon et al.
2009/0223514 September 2009 Smith et al.
2010/0147301 June 2010 Kwok
2011/0017212 January 2011 Kenyon et al.
2011/0023877 February 2011 Kenyon et al.
2011/0167430 July 2011 Ahmed et al.
2011/0180068 July 2011 Kenyon et al.
2011/0203587 August 2011 Bertinetti et al.

Other References

Lithgow et al., U.S. Appl. No. 29/290,128, filed Oct. 24, 2007. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Laymon; Way
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.

Description



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an air delivery device according to an embodiment of our design; and,

FIG. 2 is a top view thereof.

The broken lines showing environment or structure of the air delivery device are for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

The dotted lines represent the border between claimed and non-claimed subject matter and form no part of the claimed design.

The stippling in FIGS. 1 and 2 is used to indicate shading.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed