U.S. patent number D467,335 [Application Number D/156,276] was granted by the patent office on 2002-12-17 for air delivery device. This patent grant is currently assigned to ResMed Limited. Invention is credited to Andrew Cheung, Perry D. Lithgow, Susan Robyn Lynch.
United States Patent | D467,335 |
Lithgow , et al. | December 17, 2002 |
Inventors: | Lithgow; Perry D. (Glenwood, AU), Cheung; Andrew (Burwood, AU), Lynch; Susan Robyn (Epping, AU) |
---|---|
Assignee: | ResMed Limited (North Ryde,
AU) |
Appl. No.: | D/156,276 |
Filed: | February 27, 2002 |
Aug 27, 2001 [AU] | 2699/2001 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D24/110 |
Current International Class: | 2902 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/110 ;128/204.23,204.14,204.18,200.14,200.23,204.21,200.18,200.16,200.24 |
5673687 | October 1997 | Dobson et al. |
D421298 | February 2000 | Kenyon et al. |
D427675 | July 2000 | Hansel |
D450116 | November 2001 | Dal Toso |
D453567 | February 2002 | Voegele et al. |
D454393 | March 2002 | Lynch et al. |
Product Brochure: "BIPAP.RTM. Duet.RTM. System," .COPYRGT.Respironics Inc. (Feb. 1997), 4 pages. . Product Brochure: "REMStar.RTM. Plus," .COPYRGT.Respironics Inc. (2001), 6 pages.. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.