U.S. patent number D672,928 [Application Number D/382,224] was granted by the patent office on 2012-12-18 for air filter for a robotic vacuum. This patent grant is currently assigned to iRobot Corporation. Invention is credited to David Orrin Swett.
United States Patent | D672,928 |
Swett | December 18, 2012 |
Inventors: | Swett; David Orrin (Waltham, MA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | iRobot Corporation (Bedford,
MA) |
Appl. No.: | D/382,224 |
Filed: | December 30, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D32/31; D32/30 |
Current International Class: | 1505 |
Field of Search: | ;D32/25,30-31 ;55/DIG.2,DIG.3,367,368,373-374,376-378,462,464,490 ;15/347-353,DIG.8 |
5651188 | July 1997 | Swanson et al. |
D383881 | September 1997 | Gudmundsson |
D389284 | January 1998 | Gudmundsson |
5725623 | March 1998 | Bowerman et al. |
D406421 | March 1999 | Bobrosky et al. |
D425270 | May 2000 | Zahuranec |
D443740 | June 2001 | Stratford |
D445974 | July 2001 | Stratford |
D472683 | April 2003 | Stratford |
D522194 | May 2006 | Mason |
8021455 | September 2011 | Adamek et al. |
2006/0168925 | August 2006 | Whittemore |
Taiwan Search Report for Taiwan Design Patent Application No. 099306803 Dated Sep. 6, 2010. cited by other. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.