Medicinal delivery device
Hunt , et al. December 4, 2
U.S. patent number D672,031 [Application Number D/378,400] was granted by the patent office on 2012-12-04 for medicinal delivery device. This patent grant is currently assigned to The Hunt Project, LLC. Invention is credited to Paul Bradley Forrest, Ronald Douglas Hunt.
| United States Patent | D672,031 |
| Hunt , et al. | December 4, 2012 |
Medicinal delivery device
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for a medicinal delivery device, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Hunt; Ronald Douglas (Waxhaw, NC), Forrest; Paul Bradley (Cary, NC) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | The Hunt Project, LLC (Waxhaw,
NC) |
| Appl. No.: | D/378,400 |
| Filed: | November 4, 2010 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D24/107; D24/106; D24/110 |
| Current International Class: | 2401 |
| Field of Search: | ;D24/106,107,108,110,110.5 ;D23/366 ;128/200.24,201.2,201.12,205.1,205.25,205.27,205.29,206.11,206.12,206.18,206.21,207.13,207.18 ;119/860,866 ;604/93.01,285 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 2243360 | May 1941 | Slatis |
| 2620795 | December 1952 | Muhlethaler |
| 2777442 | January 1957 | Zelaib et al. |
| 3788296 | January 1974 | Klatt et al. |
| 3812853 | May 1974 | Crain |
| 3933286 | January 1976 | Karkas |
| 4030491 | June 1977 | Mattila |
| RE35408 | December 1996 | Petruson |
| 5735460 | April 1998 | Eisenbraun |
| 5850834 | December 1998 | Yoshida et al. |
| 5899382 | May 1999 | Hayes et al. |
| 5922006 | July 1999 | Sugerman |
| 6056717 | May 2000 | Finch et al. |
| D499252 | December 2004 | Lord et al. |
| 7108198 | September 2006 | Altadonna, Jr. |
| D548960 | August 2007 | Tages et al. |
| D610666 | February 2010 | Furner et al. |
| 7837649 | November 2010 | Aboff |
| D640781 | June 2011 | Brandenburg |
| 2002/0059935 | May 2002 | Wood |
| 2002/0153007 | October 2002 | Davi |
| 2005/0049501 | March 2005 | Conero et al. |
| 2005/0257793 | November 2005 | Tatsumoto |
| 2010/0307502 | December 2010 | Rummery et al. |
| 2012/0116325 | May 2012 | Hunt et al. |
| 2002306598 | Oct 2002 | JP | |||
Other References
|
Combined Search and Examination Report by United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office dated Feb. 13, 2012. cited by other . http://www.skymall.com/shopping/detail.htm?pid=101906204&c, Breathe Fit Snoring Aid, last accesses Nov. 12, 2010. cited by other . U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,224, filed Nov. 4, 2010. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simmons; Ian
Assistant Examiner: Weekley; Shannon
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Olive Law Group, PLLC
Description
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the medicinal delivery device according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a side view of the medicinal delivery device according to the invention, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof.
FIG. 3 is a top view of the medicinal delivery device according to the invention;
FIG. 4 is a bottom view of the medicinal delivery device according to the invention; and,
FIG. 5 is a rear view of the medicinal delivery device according to the invention.
The broken lines shown throughout the views are directed to environment and are for illustrative purposes only; the broken lines form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
References
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 