Shoe upper
Petrie December 4, 2
U.S. patent number D671,734 [Application Number D/430,980] was granted by the patent office on 2012-12-04 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Jason G. Petrie.
| United States Patent | D671,734 |
| Petrie | December 4, 2012 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Petrie; Jason G. (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/430,980 |
| Filed: | August 31, 2012 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,906-908,923,943-945,969,972-975 ;36/45-49,50.1,54,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D73450 | September 1927 | Tauber |
| 1695225 | December 1928 | Bohr |
| D118141 | December 1939 | Weyand |
| D339449 | September 1993 | Hatfield |
| D342600 | December 1993 | Hatfield |
| D350222 | September 1994 | Hase |
| D391752 | March 1998 | von Conta |
| D398756 | September 1998 | Tong |
| D528765 | September 2006 | Portzline |
| D529276 | October 2006 | Fogg |
| D614392 | April 2010 | Stauffer |
| D636585 | April 2011 | Williams, Jr. |
| D636586 | April 2011 | Williams, Jr. |
| D638621 | May 2011 | Mayden |
| D645241 | September 2011 | McCullagh |
| D649771 | December 2011 | Lee |
| D650570 | December 2011 | Luedecke |
| D650572 | December 2011 | Chang |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog, Footwear: Fall 1993, p. 8, published Dec. 1992, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Men's and Women's Footwear: Late Spring 2002, p. W50, published Sep. 2001, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Performance Footwear: Fall 2010, p. 34, published Nov. 2009, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Men's Footwear: Performance: Holiday 2010, pp. 21, 24, and 36, published Feb. 2010, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Basketball Footwear: Spring 2011, p. 41, published date unknown, but prior to the filing date of the present application, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Men's Footwear: Performance: Summer 2011, p. 41, published Aug. 2010, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Women's Footwear: Performance: Summer 2011, p. 15, published Aug. 2010, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Men's Performance Footwear: Spring 2012 , pp. 28 and 30, published May 2011, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog, Jordan Footwear: Summer 2012, p. 7, published Aug. 2011, Nike, Inc., USA. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a rear perspective view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The unshaded regions adjacent to the shaded area form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines showing the remainder of the shoe are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 