U.S. patent number D665,094 [Application Number D/396,681] was granted by the patent office on 2012-08-07 for couples massager. This patent grant is currently assigned to LELO Inc.. Invention is credited to Filip Sedic.
United States Patent | D665,094 |
Sedic | August 7, 2012 |
Inventors: | Sedic; Filip (Shanghai, CN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | LELO Inc. (San Jose,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/396,681 |
Filed: | July 5, 2011 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/215 |
Current International Class: | 2803 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/200,211-215 ;601/27,28,33,40,46,47,48,63,80,99,104,112,113,114,119,122,125,129,134,135,137,DIG.12,DIG.13,DIG.14,DIG.15,DIG.16,DIG.17 |
1612343 | December 1926 | Amussen |
3996930 | December 1976 | Sekulich |
D340527 | October 1993 | Goodell |
D517217 | March 2006 | Zou et al. |
D546464 | July 2007 | Savoia |
D605779 | December 2009 | Murison |
D609818 | February 2010 | Tsang et al. |
D616559 | May 2010 | Boyer |
D623306 | September 2010 | Boyer |
D637305 | May 2011 | Feuerabend et al. |
D652942 | January 2012 | Murison |
2004/0230093 | November 2004 | Marshall |
2008/0009775 | January 2008 | Murison |
2010/0305483 | December 2010 | Werdt |
2011/0012959 | January 2011 | Lin et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.