U.S. patent number D664,247 [Application Number D/400,647] was granted by the patent office on 2012-07-24 for air purifier. This patent grant is currently assigned to Oreck Holdings LLC. Invention is credited to Christopher M. Paterson.
United States Patent | D664,247 |
Paterson | July 24, 2012 |
Inventors: | Paterson; Christopher M. (Franklin, TN) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Oreck Holdings LLC (Nashville,
TN) |
Appl. No.: | D/400,647 |
Filed: | August 31, 2011 |
Current U.S. Class: | D23/364 |
Current International Class: | 2304 |
Field of Search: | ;D23/355-366,352,369,332,333,335,336,342,351 ;422/120,122 ;55/356,473,504 ;96/97 ;D14/188,170,172 ;261/DIG.17,DIG.65,DIG.88,DIG.31 ;D18/34.6 |
D373414 | September 1996 | Bucher et al. |
D374070 | September 1996 | Tomasiak et al. |
D397196 | August 1998 | Tsuji |
D462754 | September 2002 | Briggs et al. |
D500848 | January 2005 | Holderfield et al. |
D529161 | September 2006 | De'Longhi |
D534999 | January 2007 | Hussaini et al. |
D565159 | March 2008 | Shin et al. |
D566252 | April 2008 | Blateri |
D596728 | July 2009 | Campbell et al. |
D605745 | December 2009 | Chun et al. |
D617437 | June 2010 | Matsuzaki |
D639920 | June 2011 | Lewis |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.