U.S. patent number D659,970 [Application Number D/400,660] was granted by the patent office on 2012-05-22 for anti-slip sleeve for shoe. Invention is credited to Chao-Mei Liao.
United States Patent | D659,970 |
Liao | May 22, 2012 |
Inventors: | Liao; Chao-Mei (Changhua County, TW) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/400,660 |
Filed: | August 31, 2011 |
Current U.S. Class: | D2/962 |
Current International Class: | 0204 |
Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,906,908,946,947,951,953,954,955,956,962 ;36/59R,67A,67R,59C,114,115,116,126-125,7.6 |
1568064 | January 1926 | Goldman |
D272772 | February 1984 | Kohno |
D294655 | March 1988 | Heyes |
D305383 | January 1990 | Arai |
D373167 | August 1996 | Santos |
D378319 | March 1997 | Miyauchi |
D396139 | July 1998 | Dietrich |
D401044 | November 1998 | Heine |
D404191 | January 1999 | Harada et al. |
D406938 | March 1999 | Lin |
D415608 | October 1999 | Gelsomini |
D427754 | July 2000 | Portaud |
D437989 | February 2001 | Cass |
D571092 | June 2008 | Norton |
D573779 | July 2008 | Stauffer |
D583542 | December 2008 | Gerber |
D617542 | June 2010 | Stauffer |
D651386 | January 2012 | Wilken et al. |
2004/0088883 | May 2004 | Workman |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.