U.S. patent number D646,737 [Application Number D/372,450] was granted by the patent office on 2011-10-11 for putter. This patent grant is currently assigned to Joseph W Pimentel. Invention is credited to Joseph Pimentel.
United States Patent | D646,737 |
Pimentel | October 11, 2011 |
Inventors: | Pimentel; Joseph (Santa Rosa, CA) |
---|---|
Assignee: | Pimentel; Joseph W (Santa Rosa,
CA) |
Appl. No.: | D/372,450 |
Filed: | November 22, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D21/736; D21/738; D21/756 |
Current International Class: | 2102 |
Field of Search: | ;D21/736-746,756-757,759,789 ;473/324-331,340-341,248-256,295 |
3663019 | May 1972 | Palotsee |
D224545 | August 1972 | Elkins |
D239725 | April 1976 | Kindred |
4736951 | April 1988 | Grant |
D364436 | November 1995 | Thomas |
5470063 | November 1995 | Fisher |
D377067 | December 1996 | Wiens et al. |
5580051 | December 1996 | Fisher |
D380029 | June 1997 | Anderson |
D386232 | November 1997 | Lucetti |
D401991 | December 1998 | Collins |
D405137 | February 1999 | Nelson |
D430632 | September 2000 | Guerin et al. |
D432196 | October 2000 | Kleppen |
D465820 | November 2002 | Lizenbery |
D510114 | September 2005 | Lizenbery |
D571420 | June 2008 | Stites et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.