U.S. patent number D645,638 [Application Number D/388,394] was granted by the patent office on 2011-09-27 for dog treat. Invention is credited to Zhuang Mingyun, Troy Petersen.
United States Patent | D645,638 |
Mingyun , et al. | September 27, 2011 |
Inventors: | Mingyun; Zhuang (Zhejiang Province, CN), Petersen; Troy (Rosemount, MN) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/388,394 |
Filed: | March 29, 2011 |
Current U.S. Class: | D1/199 |
Current International Class: | 0101 |
Field of Search: | ;D1/100-199 ;D24/101,211,212 ;D30/160 ;D21/386,707 ;D11/50,133,134 ;426/3-6,89,104,138,139,74,623,630,635,660,806,440,441,464-474,442,460 |
D343116 | January 1994 | Reger |
D385686 | November 1997 | Parker |
6165522 | December 2000 | Lira |
D453864 | February 2002 | Olivares et al. |
D475503 | June 2003 | Etminan |
D476118 | June 2003 | Kirch |
D503506 | April 2005 | Tepper et al. |
D505533 | May 2005 | Jia et al. |
D508762 | August 2005 | Jia et al. |
D526086 | August 2006 | Mehta |
2002/0009525 | January 2002 | Janecka |
2005/0271775 | December 2005 | Kirch et al. |
2006/0107906 | May 2006 | Weinberg |
2007/0289552 | December 2007 | Axelrod et al. |
2008/0118606 | May 2008 | Stern |
2008/0145485 | June 2008 | Tepper et al. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.