U.S. patent number D643,830 [Application Number D/376,334] was granted by the patent office on 2011-08-23 for necklace bluetooth communication apparatus. Invention is credited to Peter Alan Fish.
United States Patent | D643,830 |
Fish | August 23, 2011 |
Inventors: | Fish; Peter Alan (Killara, AU) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/376,334 |
Filed: | October 5, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D14/205 |
Current International Class: | 1401 |
Field of Search: | ;D14/205,206,223 ;181/129,130,135 ;379/430,431 ;381/380,381 ;455/90.3,569.1,575.1 |
D286772 | November 1986 | Pope |
D321879 | November 1991 | Emmerling |
D331408 | December 1992 | Ellermeier |
D340033 | October 1993 | Okumura et al. |
D351171 | October 1994 | Tanaka |
D368716 | April 1996 | Shudo |
5640458 | June 1997 | Nishiguchi et al. |
D388788 | January 1998 | Zeitman |
D409614 | May 1999 | Carlton |
D421014 | February 2000 | Smith |
D457515 | May 2002 | Masamitsu et al. |
D516540 | March 2006 | Beauchemin et al. |
D539267 | March 2007 | Komiyama |
D575268 | August 2008 | Christopher et al. |
D590810 | April 2009 | Komiyama |
D593538 | June 2009 | Chon et al. |
D594442 | June 2009 | Chon et al. |
D604269 | November 2009 | Choe |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.