Nesting container
Davis July 19, 2
U.S. patent number D641,592 [Application Number D/353,280] was granted by the patent office on 2011-07-19 for nesting container. This patent grant is currently assigned to Bristol Manufacturing Corporation. Invention is credited to Warren Brent Davis.
| United States Patent | D641,592 |
| Davis | July 19, 2011 |
Nesting container
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for nesting container, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Davis; Warren Brent (Springfield, MO) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | Bristol Manufacturing
Corporation (Davison, MO) |
| Appl. No.: | D/353,280 |
| Filed: | January 6, 2010 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D7/615 |
| Current International Class: | 0902 |
| Field of Search: | ;D7/509,523,530,531,532,584,586,601-603,619.1,619.2,612,614,615,701,703,707,708,621,622 ;D9/737,738,744,745,500,551,556,558 ;215/379,381-385,6,10 ;220/592.16,592.17,495.01,495.03,23.4,23.6,23.87,23.9,500,501,506,62.11,62.12,600,608,660,669,670,675 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 3288340 | November 1966 | Shapiro et al. |
| 3531013 | September 1970 | Hammes |
| 3811597 | May 1974 | Frankenberg et al. |
| D237136 | October 1975 | Swatt |
| D241228 | August 1976 | Boduchi |
| D241801 | October 1976 | Colato |
| D245896 | September 1977 | Philippon |
| D267929 | February 1983 | Torterotot |
| 4971215 | November 1990 | Santoni |
| D322032 | December 1991 | Pallsin, Jr. |
| 5201437 | April 1993 | Burgdorf |
| D338636 | August 1993 | Moore |
| 5256051 | October 1993 | Langos et al. |
| D352210 | November 1994 | Cousins et al. |
| D359150 | June 1995 | Malik et al. |
| D367996 | March 1996 | Rausch |
| 5607075 | March 1997 | Burgdorf et al. |
| 5685452 | November 1997 | Kristoffersson |
| D390422 | February 1998 | Daenen et al. |
| 5713482 | February 1998 | Bordner et al. |
| 5785201 | July 1998 | Bordner et al. |
| 5918757 | July 1999 | Przytulla et al. |
| 5947320 | September 1999 | Bordner et al. |
| 6116500 | September 2000 | Cahill |
| 6401957 | June 2002 | Przytulla |
| D470725 | February 2003 | Basara |
| D489501 | May 2004 | Dretzka |
| D514895 | February 2006 | van Elderen |
| D523292 | June 2006 | Eastman, III |
| 7216769 | May 2007 | Palder |
| D558532 | January 2008 | Peterson |
| D573390 | July 2008 | Ablo |
| D574191 | August 2008 | Ablo |
| D577253 | September 2008 | Bodum |
| D582730 | December 2008 | Kim |
| D618967 | July 2010 | Bodum |
| 2005/0040068 | February 2005 | Palder |
| 2005/0224505 | October 2005 | Brown et al. |
| 2007/0017920 | January 2007 | Davis |
| 2007/0205128 | September 2007 | Davis |
| 0 784 020 | Jul 1997 | EP | |||
| 2 075 462 | Nov 1981 | GB | |||
Assistant Examiner: Oswecki; Elizabeth J
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Husch Blackwell LLP
Description
FIG. 1. is a perspective view of the nesting container of the subject invention.
FIG. 2 is a front view of the nesting container of FIG. 1, the left, right side, and rear view being identical thereto.
FIG. 3. is a bottom view of the nesting container of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 4. is a top view of the nesting container of FIG. 1.
In the drawings, the broken lines in FIGS. 3 and 4 depict portions of the design that form no part of the claim.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 