U.S. patent number D637,132 [Application Number D/368,376] was granted by the patent office on 2011-05-03 for wiper for automobiles. This patent grant is currently assigned to ADM21 Co., Ltd., In-Kyu Kim. Invention is credited to In-Kyu Kim.
United States Patent | D637,132 |
Kim | May 3, 2011 |
Inventors: | Kim; In-Kyu (Ansan-si, KR) |
---|---|
Assignee: | ADM21 Co., Ltd. (Gyeonggi-do,
KR) Kim; In-Kyu (Gyeonggi-do, KR) |
Appl. No.: | D/368,376 |
Filed: | August 23, 2010 |
May 31, 2010 [KR] | 30-2010-0023910 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | D12/219 |
Current International Class: | 1206 |
Field of Search: | ;D12/219-220 ;15/246,247,250.001,250.4,250.361,250.19,250.03,250.31-250.33,250.351,250.38,250.201,250.451,250.458,250.04,250.07,250.44 |
D494125 | August 2004 | Leu |
D494527 | August 2004 | Hsu |
D579401 | October 2008 | Garrastacho et al. |
D579849 | November 2008 | Garrastacho et al. |
D596103 | July 2009 | Kim |
D601077 | September 2009 | Kim |
D615474 | May 2010 | Kim |
2005/0183227 | August 2005 | Hienzsch |
2006/0010636 | January 2006 | Vacher |
2007/0192983 | August 2007 | Chen |
2008/0060161 | March 2008 | Boland et al. |
2008/0313844 | December 2008 | Nacamuli |
2010/0275403 | November 2010 | Jollec |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.