Shoe upper
Taylor April 5, 2
U.S. patent number D635,349 [Application Number D/380,966] was granted by the patent office on 2011-04-05 for shoe upper. This patent grant is currently assigned to NIKE, Inc.. Invention is credited to Justin R. Taylor.
| United States Patent | D635,349 |
| Taylor | April 5, 2011 |
Shoe upper
Claims
CLAIM The ornamental design for a shoe upper, as shown and described.
| Inventors: | Taylor; Justin R. (Portland, OR) |
|---|---|
| Assignee: | NIKE, Inc. (Beaverton,
OR) |
| Appl. No.: | D/380,966 |
| Filed: | December 14, 2010 |
| Current U.S. Class: | D2/972 |
| Current International Class: | 0299 |
| Field of Search: | ;D2/896,902,906-908,943,944,969,972-974 ;36/45-49,50.1,77M,77R,83,88,113,114,126-131 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| D262751 | January 1982 | Anderie |
| D265435 | July 1982 | Vermonet |
| D279139 | June 1985 | Gamm |
| D303038 | August 1989 | Clark |
| D311092 | October 1990 | Hatfield |
| D315441 | March 1991 | Hatfield |
| D315633 | March 1991 | Nakao |
| D316323 | April 1991 | Hatfield |
| D325809 | May 1992 | Close |
| D328515 | August 1992 | Brown et al. |
| D330451 | October 1992 | Hatfield |
| D330452 | October 1992 | Hatfield |
| D333032 | February 1993 | Hatfield |
| D342147 | December 1993 | Morris |
| D344396 | February 1994 | Hoeft et al. |
| D345253 | March 1994 | Lucas |
| D346899 | May 1994 | Hatfield et al. |
| D351941 | November 1994 | Avar |
| D358021 | May 1995 | Vestuti |
| D382695 | August 1997 | Teague |
| D385412 | October 1997 | Teague |
| D394743 | June 1998 | Koh |
| D473718 | April 2003 | Park |
| D503519 | April 2005 | Della Valle |
| D524534 | July 2006 | Edwards |
| D527887 | September 2006 | Chen |
| D534342 | January 2007 | Minami |
| D542023 | May 2007 | Dunshee |
| D546537 | July 2007 | Petrie |
| D546547 | July 2007 | Harlow |
| D548446 | August 2007 | Petrie |
| D548447 | August 2007 | Morris |
| D595494 | July 2009 | Lane, III |
| D600901 | September 2009 | St-Louis et al. |
| D622486 | August 2010 | Goldston et al. |
Other References
|
Nike Footwear Catalog Late Spring 1998; p. 8; published Sep. 1997. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Fall 1999; p. W27; published Nov. 1998. cited by other . Nike Catalog Late Fall 1999 Oct./Nov. Flow Footwear; p. 9-10; published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Catalog Late Fall 1999 Oct./Nov. Flow Footwear; p.15; published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Catalog Late Fall 1999 Oct./Nov. Flow Footwear; p. 22; published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Holiday 1999; p. M16; published Mar. 1999. cited by other . Nike Footwear Catalog Holiday 1999; p. M134; published Mar. 1999. cited by other. |
Primary Examiner: Simone; Dominic
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Banner & Witcoff, Ltd.
Description
FIG. 1 is a rear perspective view of a shoe upper showing my new design;
FIG. 2 is a side view thereof; and,
FIG. 3 is a front perspective view thereof.
The broken lines immediately adjacent to the shaded area represent unclaimed boundaries of the design. The broken lines showing the thirteen oval regions and the remainder of the shoe are for environmental purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.
* * * * *
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 