U.S. patent number D635,270 [Application Number D/364,431] was granted by the patent office on 2011-03-29 for ankle brace. Invention is credited to Pang-Ching Chiang.
United States Patent | D635,270 |
Chiang | March 29, 2011 |
Inventors: | Chiang; Pang-Ching (Taipei, TW) |
---|---|
Appl. No.: | D/364,431 |
Filed: | June 23, 2010 |
Current U.S. Class: | D24/192 |
Current International Class: | 2401 |
Field of Search: | ;D24/190-192 ;D29/121.2 ;602/3,5,6,13,16,21-23,26,27,30,60-66 ;2/16,22,24,239 ;128/869,879,893,894,DIG.20 ;36/4,8.1-8.3,30,88-89,91,96,99,102,108 ;D2/980,989,902,913 |
1205206 | November 1916 | Hofmeister |
D251937 | May 1979 | Van Doren |
D270284 | August 1983 | Lindh et al. |
5031607 | July 1991 | Peters |
D326719 | June 1992 | Eghamn |
D345421 | March 1994 | Schumann et al. |
D394905 | June 1998 | Duback et al. |
5971946 | October 1999 | Quinn et al. |
6053884 | April 2000 | Peters |
D436177 | January 2001 | Miller |
D457639 | May 2002 | McCoy |
D501928 | February 2005 | Smits |
6858017 | February 2005 | Peters |
D503480 | March 2005 | Ingimundarson et al. |
D550370 | September 2007 | Peters et al. |
7740602 | June 2010 | Christensen |
D620124 | July 2010 | Einarsson |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.